Skip to main content

Do Students from Different Cultures Think Differently about Critical and Other Thinking Skills?

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore what students from different cultural backgrounds think “good” thinking skills are, including the skills they perceive as being necessary in their studies. We report on findings from focus group interviews we conducted with undergraduate university students from Kyoto and Okinawa in Japan, and from Auckland in New Zealand. What the students said during the interviews shows important similarities in views about what “good thinkers” possess, including many qualities associated with critical thinking such as consideration of different or alternative perspectives. However, when we specifically asked about the meaning of “critical thinking,” many of the students from Okinawa indicated uncertainty in their responses, and the students from Auckland and Okinawa also referred to thinking approaches that are not commonly associated with critical thinking such as intuition and positive thinking. The findings from our investigation suggest that students need more explicit instruction to promote critical thinking skills development, and that they should be provided clearer, more transparent explanations of the thinking skills they are expected to demonstrate in their courses of study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asian University for Women. 2013. Academic Programs 2008–2013. February 3. Available from http://asian-university.org/academic_programs.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of American Colleges and Universities. 2013. College Learning for the New Global Century 2007. February 2. Available from http://www.aacu.org/leap/documents/GlobalCentury_final.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, D. 1997. “A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in Tesol.” TESOL Quarterly 31 (1): 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. 1962. “A Concept of Critical Thinking.” Harvard Educational Review 32: 81–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A., and Scriven, M. 1997. Critical Thinking: Its Definition and Assessment. Norwich, UK: Centre for Research in Critical Thinking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, C. B. 2011. “Critical Thinking in a Second Language.” Higher Education Research and Development 30 (3): 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, H. 1994. Listening to the World. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassner, A., Weinstock, M., and Neuman, Y. 2005. “Pupils’ Evaluation and Generation of Evidence and Explanation in Argumentation.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 75 (1): 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. 1998. “Teaching Critical Thinking for Transfer across Domains: Dispositions, Skills, Structure Training, and Metacognitive Monitoring.” American Psychologist 53 (4): 449–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L., and Eccles, J. S. 1992. “Teacher Expectations II: Construction and Reflection of Student Achievement.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 (6): 947–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lun, V. M. C., Fischer, R., and Ward, C. 2010. “Exploring Cultural Differences in Critical Thinking: Is It about My Thinking Style or the Language I Speak?” Learning and Individual Differences 20 (6): 604–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., and Kitayama, S. 1991. “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation.” Psychological Review 98 (2): 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. 2007. “Critical Thinking and Learning.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 39: 339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., and Turnbull, W. 1986. “Expectancies and Interpersonal Processes.” Annual Review of Psychology 37 (1): 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Japan. 2013. Developing Global Human Resources through Industry-Academia-Government Collaboration 2010. February 7. Available from http://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/data/20100423_02.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan. 2013. Higher Education Bureau. Higher Education in Japan 2009. February 7. Available from http://www.mext.go.jp/englishlkoutou/detail/_icsFiles/afieldfile/2009/12/0311287370_1_1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, M. 2005. “Is Critical Analysis Foreign to Chinese Students?” In Communication Skills in University Education: The International Dimension, edited by E. Manalo and G. Wong-Toi. Auckland, New Zealand: Pearson Education. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharrer, L., Bromme, R., Britt, M. A., and Stadtler, M. 2012. “The Seduction of Easiness: How Science Depictions Influence Laypeople’s Reliance on Their Own Evaluation of Scientific Information.” Learning and Instruction 22 (3): 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton, P. 2002. “Critical Thinking in Japanese L2 Writing: Rethinking Tired Constructs.” ELT Journal: English Language Teachers Journal 56 (3): 250–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapper, J. 2004. “Student Perceptions of How Critical Thinking Is Embedded in a Degree Program.” Higher Education Research and Development 23 (2): 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomm, E., and Bromme, R. 2011. “‘It Should at Least Seem Scientific!’ Textual Features of ‘Scientificness’ and Their Impact on Lay Assessments of Online Information.” Science Education 96 (2): 187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Auckland. 2013. Graduate Profile 2003. February 2. Available from http://www.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/home/for/current-students/cs-academic-information/cs-regulations-policies-and-guidelines/cs-graduate-profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D., and Birmingham, P. 2003. Using Research Instruments: A Guide for Researchers. Edited by Peter Birmingham. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Martin Davies Ronald Barnett

Copyright information

© 2015 Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manalo, E., Kusumi, T., Koyasu, M., Michita, Y., Tanaka, Y. (2015). Do Students from Different Cultures Think Differently about Critical and Other Thinking Skills?. In: Davies, M., Barnett, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics