Skip to main content

Diversity: The Voluntary Sector’s Vision in Criminal Justice

  • Chapter
The Voluntary Sector and Criminal Justice

Abstract

Since the late 1990s in particular, issues relating to equality, diversity and anti-discrimination have had increasing influence in relation to policy development and the construction of legislation (Mitchell, 2010). Diversity has certainly been a key part of the criminal justice discourse, with a significant amount of political and media attention towards issues relating to immigration and multiculturalism (Spalek and El-Hassan, 2007). Beyond this, there have been pressures from within the European Union, shaping directives of anti-discrimination and equal opportunities that go beyond race and ethnicity – including gender/sex, religion, disability, age and sexual orientation (European Commission, 2008; Equality Act, 2010). However, it has been argued that these positive policy and legislation changes as well as commitments to address diversity have suffered from a lack of commitment and loss of enthusiasm, with some agencies instead resorting to actions which equate to general ‘tick box’ exercises and do little more than satisfy statutory requirements (Mitchell, 2010).

‘Diversity’ as a concept and as a strategy for change can easily be hijacked by the imperatives of managerialism, losing its force as a means of promoting social justice, and becoming rather a means of achieving narrower organisational aims and objectives which provide the surface appearance rather than the deeper essentials of diversity. (Bhui, 2003: 196)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartlett, A. and Evans, S. (2012) Response to Stephen Ginn’s Paper on Elderly Prisoners, British Medical Journal. http://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e6263/rr/612599

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhui, H. S. (2003) Deconstructing Diversity, Probation Journal, 50 (3): 195–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, E. and Anstey, G. (2012) Scoping Study–Quality Assurance in the Voluntary and Community Sector, London: NCVO and Office of Public Management. Available from: http://www.voscur.org/news/qualitystandardsreport

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryans, S., Martin, C. and Walker, R. (2002) The Road Ahead: Issues and Strategies for Future Joint Working, in: Bryans, S., Martin, C. and Walker, R. (eds) Prisons and the Voluntary Sector. Winchester: Waterside Press: 162–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. and Collett, S. (2015) Delivering Rehabilitation: The Politics, Governance and Control of Probation. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office (2010) Modernising Commissioning. Increasing the Role of Charities, Social Enterprises, Mutual and Cooperatives in Public Service Delivery. London: Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborti, N. (2010) Hate Crime: Concepts, Policy Future Directions. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinks/ARO (2007) Women Offenders. NOMS and VCS. London: Clinks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, E. and Church, E. (2002) Health Needs Assessment of Immigration Detainees. Liverpool, London: HM Prison Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, V. (2013) NO FIXED ABODE: The Implications for Homeless People in the Criminal Justice System. London: The Howard League for Penal Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corston, J. (2007) The Corston Report: A Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, E. and Sparks, R. (2005) Hidden Injuries? Researching the Experiences of Older Men in English Prisons, Howard Journal, 44 (4): 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Justice Joint Inspection (2011) Thematic Inspection Report. Equal But Different. An Inspection of the Use of Alternatives to Prison for Women Offenders. A Joint Inspection by HMI Probation, HMCPSI and HMI Prisons, October 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defty, A. (2014) Can You Tell What It Is Yet? Attitudes Towards ‘the Big Society’, Social Policy and Society, 13 (1): 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earle, R. and Phillips, C. (2013) Muslim is the New Black: New Ethnicities and New Essentialisms in the Prison, Race and Justice, 3 (2): 114–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Equality Act 2010 (c. 15 ). London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) Continuing the Diversity Journey: Business Practices, Perspectives and Benefits. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. and Hedderman, C. (2012) Providing for Women Offenders: The Risks of Adopting a Payment by Results Approach, Probation Journal, 59 (4): 374–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. and McIvor, G. (2007) Difference and Diversity in Probation, in: Gelsthorpe, L. and Morgan, R. (eds) Handbook of Probation. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. and Sharpe, G. (2007) Provision for Women Offenders in the Community. London: Fawcett Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L., Padfield, N. and Phillips, J. (2012) Deaths on Probation: An Analysis of Data Regarding People Dying under Probation Supervision. London: Howard League for Penal Reform. Available from: http://www.howardleague.org/deathsonprobation/

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginn, S. (2012) Healthcare in Prisons: Elderly Prisoners, British Medical Journal, 345, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6263 (Published 15 October 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales, L. and Gelsthorpe, L. (2012) The Criminalization of Migrant Women. Cambridge: Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C. (2011) Policy Developments in England and Wales, in: Sheehan, R., McIvor, G. and Trotter, C. (eds) Working With Women In The Community. Cullompton: Willan Publishing: 26–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C. (2013) Payment by Results: Hopes, Fears and Evidence, British Journal of Community Justice, 11 (2–3): 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) (2009) Disabled Prisoners. A Short Thematic Review of the Care and Support of Prisoners with a Disability. London: HMIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) (2010) Muslim Prisoners’ Experiences: A Thematic Review. http://www.icpa.ca/tools/download/1161/HM_Chief_Inspector_of_Prisons_-_Muslim_Prisoners_-_A_thematic_review.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard League (2011) All Party Parliamentary Group on Women in the Penal System. Second Report on Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System. London: Howard League.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hucklesby, A. (2012) The Third Sector in Criminal Justice. Feedback from the Seminar Series. http://www.law.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/research/ccjs/towards/hucklesby/pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (1989) Discrimination and Disparity: The Influence of Race on Sentencing, New Community, 16 (1): 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice Committee (2013) Fifth Report. Older Prisoners. http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/Justice/Older-prisoners.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, W. (1999) The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry. Report of an Inquiry by Sir William Macpherson of Cluny. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty, February 1999. Cm 4262-I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M. (2012) Response 1: Big Society, the Voluntary Sector and the Marketisation of Criminal Justice, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 12 (5): 483–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. (2002) Recent Progress in Community Based Voluntary Sector Work with the Prison Service, in: Bryans, S., Martin, C. and Walker, R. (eds) Prisons and the Voluntary Sector. Winchester: Waterside Press: 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayblin, L. and Soteri-Proctor, A. (2011) The Black Minority Ethnic Third Sector: A Resource Paper. Working Paper 58, Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, D. (2013) Not Hearing Us: An Exploration of the Experience of Deaf Prisoners in English and Welsh Prisons. London: Howard League for Penal Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, R., Gojkovic, D. and Mills, A. (2010) The Role of the Third Sector in Work with Offenders; The Perceptions of Criminal Justice and Third Sector Stakeholders. Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre (TSRC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2013) Statistics on Race and the Criminal Justice System 2012. A Ministry of Justice Publication under Section 95 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice and National Offender Management Service (2014) Transforming Rehabilitation. http://www.gov.uk/government/policies/reducing-reoffending-and-improving-rehabilitation/supporting-pages/transforming-rehabilitation

    Google Scholar 

  • Minow, M. (2002) Partners not Rivals: Privatization and the Public Good. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. (2010) Diversity and the Policy Agenda in Criminal Justice, in: Pycroft, A. and Gough, D. (eds) Multi-agency Working in Criminal Justice: Control and Care in Contemporary Correction Practice. Bristol: The Policy Press, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T., Beishon, S. and Virdee, S. (1994) Changing Ethnic Identities. London: Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2012) Crime and Justice in the ‘Big Society’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 12 (5): 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCVO (2013) Counting the Cuts: The Impact of Spending Cuts on the UK Voluntary and Community Sector–2013 Update. Available from: http://www.ncvo.org.uk/images/documents/policy_and_research/funding/counting_the_cuts_2013.pdf [accessed 26/3/15].

    Google Scholar 

  • NCVO and OPM (2012) Scoping Study–Quality Assurance in the Voluntary and Community Sector. London: NCVO and OPM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, B. (2009) Volunteering Across the Criminal Justice System. London: The Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Philanthropy Capital (NPC) (2009) Breaking the Cycle: Charities Working with People in Prison and on Release. London: New Philanthropy Capital.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offender Health Research Network (2009) A National Evaluation of Prison Mental Health In-reach Services. Manchester: University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. and Bowling, B. (2012) Ethnicities, Racism, Crime, and Criminal Justice, in: Maguire, M., Morgan, R. and Reiner, R. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology ( Fifth edition ). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 370–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. and Webster, C. (2013) New Directions and New Generations–Old and New Racism?, in: Phillip, C. and Webster, C. (eds) New Directions in Race, Ethnicity and Crime. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge: 178–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prison Reform Trust (2000) Justice for Women: The Need for Reform. The Report of the Commission on Women’s Imprisonment. London: Prison Reform Trust [Chaired by Baroness Dorothy Wedderburn].

    Google Scholar 

  • Prison Reform Trust (2011) Reforming Women’s Justice. Final Report of the Women’s Taskforce. London: Prison Reform Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prison Reform Trust (2012) No Way Out. A Briefing Paper on Foreign National Women in Prison in England and Wales. London: Prison Reform Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prison Reform Trust and Soroptimist International (2014a) Transforming Lives. Reducing Women’s Imprisonment. London: Prison Reform Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prison Reform Trust (2014b) Bromley Briefings Prisons Factfile (28.10. 14 ). London: Prisons Reform Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, J., Whitworth, A. and Carter, E. (2014) Support for All in the UK Work Programme? Differential Payments, Same Old Problem, Social Policy and Administration, 48 (2): 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanglin-Grant, S. (2003) Divided by the Same Language? Equal Opportunities and Diversity Translated. A Runnymede Trust Briefing Paper. London: Runnymede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen (1992) Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvestri, M. (2009) Partners or Prisoners? Voluntary Sector Independence in the World of Commissioning and Contestability. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smellie, E. and Crow, I. (1991) Black People’s Experiences of Criminal Justice, London: NACRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalek, B. and El-Hassan, S. (2007) Muslim Converts in Prison, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46 (2): 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, N. (2010) Cameron Promises Power for the ‘Man and Woman on the Street’, The Guardian (London: Guardian Newspapers). Archived from the original (19 July). http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/jul/19/david-cameron- big-society-cuts [accessed 3/4/15].

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, L. (2014) The Young Review. Improving Outcomes for Young Black and/or Muslim Men in the Criminal Justice System. London: Clinks [Chaired by Baroness Lola Young].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Loraine Gelsthorpe and Jane Dominey

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gelsthorpe, L., Dominey, J. (2016). Diversity: The Voluntary Sector’s Vision in Criminal Justice. In: Hucklesby, A., Corcoran, M. (eds) The Voluntary Sector and Criminal Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137370679_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics