Skip to main content

When Worlds Collide: Researching and Evaluating the Voluntary Sector’s Work with Offenders

  • Chapter
The Voluntary Sector and Criminal Justice

Abstract

Government and statutory sector agencies gain considerable value from securing voluntary sector involvement in the delivery of services to marginalised, hard-to-reach groups. Meanwhile, many voluntary sector organisations (VSOs) accept government and statutory sector funding because it provides a level of financial security which (in theory) ensures a reliable service to their clients. Until 2014, in the case of services for offenders in England and Wales, this was usually achieved by contracting out specific aspects of service provision to VSOs. From now on it is more likely that VSOs will be the junior partners in commercially led consortia or subcontractors to such consortia. In either situation, the funding services provided by VSOs are increasingly requiring evidence of success and effectiveness, which many VSOs are ill-equipped to provide. This chapter considers some of the consequences of the new requirements for VSOs to ‘prove’ their worth. It argues that the very characteristics which make involving the voluntary sector in service delivery attractive to funders also make them hard to evaluate in the sorts of ways which government and other funders increasingly require.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anti-Trafficking Monitoring Group (2013) In the Dock: Examining the UK’s Criminal Justice Response to Trafficking. London: ECPAT UK. http://www.ecpat.org.uk/sites/default/files/in_the _dock_atmg_2013.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchette, K. and Brown, S. L. (2006) The Assessment and Treatment of Women Offenders: An Integrative Perspective. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office (2010) The Compact: The Coalition Government and Civil Society Organisations Working Effectively in Partnership for the Benefit of Communities and Citizens in England. London: Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, D., Rajme, F. G. and Mohan, J. (2010) How Dependent is the Third Sector on Public Funding? Evidence from the National Survey of Third Sector Organisations. Working Paper 45, Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre. Available from: http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/Publications/tabid/500/Default.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinks (2013) Clinks Briefing on the Competition Stage of the Transforming Rehabilitation Reforms. London: Clinks. Available from: http://www.clinks.org/sites/default/files/basic/filesdownloads/Members%20Briefing%20-%20 Competition%20stage%20of%20the%20TR%20reforms%20FINAL.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, A., Galbraith, I., Lyon, P. and Ross, H. (2007) PS Plus: A Prison (Lately) Probation-based Employment Resettlement Model, in: Hucklesby, A. and Hagley-Dickinson, L. (eds) Prisoner Resettlement: Policy and Practice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing: 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D (2006) Criminal and Social Justice, London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Corston, J. (2007) The Corston Report: A Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crown Prosecution Service (2013) Code for Crown Prosecutors. London: CPS. Available from: http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/code_for_crown_prosecutors/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. and Albertson, K. (2011) Payment by Results and Social Impact Bonds in the Criminal Justice Sector: New Challenges for the Concept of Evidence-based Policy?, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11 (5): 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A., Fox, C. and March, C. (2013) Could Personalisation Reduce Re-offending? Reflections on Potential Lessons from British Social Care Reform for the British Criminal Justice System, Journal of Social Policy, 42 (4): 721–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gojkovic, D., Mills, A. and Meeks, R. (2011) Scoping the Involvement of Third Sector Organisations in the Seven Resettlement Pathways for Offenders. Working Paper 5 7, Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre. Available from: http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/Publications/tabid/500/Default.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlock, J. (2013) Impact Measurement Practice in the UK Third Sector: A Review of emerging evidence. Working Paper 106, Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C. (2004) The ‘Criminogenic’ Needs of Women Offenders, in: McIvor, G. (ed.), Women Who Offend. London: Jessica Kingsley: 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C. and Jolliffe, D. (2013) Analysing the Needs, Change in Needs and Reconvictions of Women Accessing a Woman’s Centre: A Report for the Corston Independent Funders’ Coalition (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C., Palmer, E. and Hollin, C. (2008) Implementing Services for Women Offenders and Those ‘At Risk’ of Offending: Action Research with Together Women. Ministry of Justice Research Series 12/08. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C., Gunby, C. and Shelton, N. (2011) What Women Want: The Importance of Qualitative Approaches in Evaluating Work with Women Offenders, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11 (1): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HM Government (2010) Building a Stronger Civil Society: A Strategy for Voluntary and Community Groups, Charities and Social Enterprises. London: Cabinet Office. Available from: http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/78927/building-stronger-civil-society. pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury (2002) The Role of the Voluntary and Community Sector in Service Delivery. London: Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury (2010) Spending Review 2010. London: TSO. Available from: http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/203826/ Spending_review_2010.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury (2013) Spending Round 2013. London: TSO. Available from: http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/209036/ spending-round-2013-complete.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollin, C. R. and Palmer, E. J. (2006) Criminogenic Need and Women Offenders: A Critique of the Literature, Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11: 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hucklesby, A. (2011) Bail Support Schemes for Adults. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hucklesby, A. and Wincup, E. (2007) Models of Resettlement Work with Prisoners, in: Hucklesby, A. and Hagley-Dickinson, L. (eds) Prisoner Resettlement: Policy and Practice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing: 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hucklesby, A. and Wincup, E. (eds) (2010) Drug Interventions in Criminal Justice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hucklesby, A. and Wincup, E. (2014) Assistance, Support and Monitoring? The Paradoxes of Mentoring Adults in the Criminal Justice System, Journal of Social Policy, 43 (2): 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hucklesby, A. and Worrall, J. (2007) The Voluntary Sector and Prisoners’ Resettlement, in: Hucklesby, A. and Hagley-Dickinson, L. (eds) Prisoner Resettlement: Policy and Practice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing: 174–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, D., Hedderman, C., Palmer, E. and Hollin, C. (2011) Reoffending Analysis of Women Offenders Referred to Together Women (TW) & the Scope to Divert from Custody. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, G. and Burke, L. (2012) Redemption, Rehabilitation and Risk Management: A History of Probation. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, T. (1991) Probation: Politics, Policy and Practice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, G., Hall, A., Hayward, G., Hudson, C. and Roberts, C. (2004) Basic Skills Programmes in the Probation Service. Online Report 14/04. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2013a) Transforming Rehabilitation: A Strategy for Reform. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2013b) Transforming Rehabilitation Competition. London: Ministry of Justice. Available from: http://www.justice.gov.uk/transformingrehabilitation/competition

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2007) Probation, Governance and Accountability, in: Gelsthorpe, L. and Morgan, R. (eds) The Handbook of Probation. Cullompton: Willan Publishing: 90–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (NAO) (2005) Working with the Third Sector. London: National Audit Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (NAO) (2009) Intelligent Monitoring: An Element of Financial Relationships with Third Sector Organisations. London: National

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Office. National Audit Office (NAO) (2011) Annual Report. London: National

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Office. National Audit Office (NAO) (2014) Probation: Landscape Review. Report to the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 1100 Session 2013–14. London: NAO. Available from: http://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Probationlandscape-review.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • National Offender Management Service (NOMS) (2006) Women’s Offending Reduction Programme: 2006 Review of Progress. London: NOMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Offender Management Service (NOMS) (2008) Working with the Third Sector to Reduce Re-offending: Securing Effective Partnerships 2008–2011. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Offender Management Service (NOMS) (2011) National Standards for the Management of Offenders, 2011. London: Ministry of Justice. Available from: http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ file/217252/national-standards-management-offenders-2011.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • National Offender Management Service (NOMS) (2013) How the National Offender Management Service Works. London: Ministry of Justice. Available from: http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/about/noms/noms-org-chart.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • National Offender Management Service (NOMS) (2014a) Justice Data Lab Statistics, November 2014. Available from: http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/373676/justice-data-lab-statistics-nov-2014.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • National Offender Management Service (NOMS) (2014b) NOMS Annual Report and Accounts (2013–14). London: HM Stationary Office. Available from: http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/322699/ NOMS_AR_2014_web.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburn, T. (2008) Models of Policing, in: Newburn, T. (ed.) The Handbook of Policing. Cullompton: Willan Publishing: 17–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, A. (2002) Principles and Pragmatism: Surviving Working with the Prison Service, in: Bryans, S., Martin, C. and Walker, R. (eds) Prisons and the Voluntary Sector. Winchester: Waterside Press: 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, C. (1999) Working with Involuntary Clients: A Guide to Practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Carol Hedderman and Anthea Hucklesby

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hedderman, C., Hucklesby, A. (2016). When Worlds Collide: Researching and Evaluating the Voluntary Sector’s Work with Offenders. In: Hucklesby, A., Corcoran, M. (eds) The Voluntary Sector and Criminal Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137370679_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics