Skip to main content

Dialectic and Dystopia: “This might come as a shock…”

  • Chapter
Juliet Mitchell and the Lateral Axis

Abstract

Each of Juliet Mitchell’s texts has an iridescent quality that allows us, as time passes, to see both particular passages and our world differently. Part of this quality is the result of a core question that animates each of Mitchell’s books, and which keeps being reactivated by our concrete personal and political experiences even as circumstances are reconfigured: Why are inequalities between men and women so pervasive, even in movements that purport to be primarily concerned with equality? Mitchell has been described as a “conservative” by scholars such as Lynne Segal (2001) for even asking this question, since it seems to presume sexual difference as a single, natural, and immovable binary along reproductive lines (see also Grosz 1990; Chiland 2004). Yet in fact Mitchell’s interest has been to interrogate why genital and reproductive differences between human beings, which in themselves imply little at all about how our lives or our society should be structured, have been figured with a significance that allows them to support the entrenchment and naturalization of inequalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Althusser, L. [1962] 2005. “Contradiction and Overdetermination.” In For Marx, translated by Ben Brewster, 87–128. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. 1972. Ideology in Social Science. London: Fontana/Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. 2013. “Is Leninism finished?” Socialist Review, January 13, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Committee of the Socialist Workers Party 2013. “The SWP and Women’s Oppression.” http://socialistunity.com/wp-content/uploads/2013 /03/SWP-internal-bulletin-special-conference-march2013.pdf

  • Chiland, C. 2004. “Gender and Sexual Difference” in Dialogues on Sexuality, Gender, and Psychoanalysis, edited by Irene Matthis, 79–91. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Communist Party of Great Britain 2013a. “Transcript ofthe Disputes Committee Report to Conference.” http://www.cpgb.org.uk/home/weekly-worker /online-only/report-of-swps-disputes-committee-and-conference-debate

  • Communist Party of Great Britain 2013b. “Callinicos threatens’LynchMobs’.” http://www.cpgb.org.uk/home/weekly-worker/online-only/callinicos-threatens-lynch-mobs

  • Crick, B. 1984. Socialist Values and Time, Fabian Tract 495. London: The Fabian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerbach, L. A. [1843] 1986. Principals of the Philosophy of the Future, translated by Manfred Vogel. New York: Hackett & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. [1975] 1977 Discipline and Punish, translated by Alan Sheridan. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. [1909] 2001. “Notes upon a Case of Obsessional Neurosis,” Standard Edition, Volume 10, edited by James Strachey, 153–318. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. [1914] 2001. “On Narcissism: An Introduction,” Standard Edition, Volume 14, edited by James Strachey, London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. [1915] 2001. “Instincts and their Vicissitudes,” Standard Edition, Volume 14, edited by James Strachey, London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. [1933] 2001. “New Introductory Lectures.” Standard Edition, Volume 22, edited by James Strachey, London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. [1938] 2001. “Findings, Ideas, Problems,” Standard Edition, Volume 23, edited by James Strachey, 299–300, London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. 1999. The Work of the Negative, translated by Andrew Weiler, New York: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, P. 2000. “Orwell as a (Neo)conservative: The Reception of 1984.” Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association 33(1): 44–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. 1990. Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guntrip, H. 1975. “My Experience of Analysis with Fairbairn and Winnicott.” International Review of Psychanalysis 2: 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. [1807] 1977 Phenomenology of Spirit, translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. [1832] 2010. The Science of Logic, translated by George Di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, Q. 1967 ‘Discussion on “Women: The Longest Revolution.” New Left Review 41: 78–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. 1996. The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingle, S. 1993. George Orwell: A Political Life. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. 2010. Valences of the Dialectics. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. [1928] 1998. “Early Stages of the Oedipus Complex.” In Love, Guilt And Reparation, Writings of Melanie Klein 1921–1945, 186–198. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. [1930] 1975. “The Importance of Symbol-Formation in the Development of the Ego.” In Love, Guilt And Reparation, Writings of Melanie Klein 1921–1945, 219–232. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. 1932. The Psychoanalysis of Children. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. [1953] 1977 “Function and Field of Speech and Language.” In Écrits: A Selectio, translated by Alan Sheridan, 30–113. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. [1956] 1991. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: The Psychoses 1955–56, Book III, edited by John Forrester. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, T. 1996. “Feminist Social Theory.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, edited by Bryan Turner. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1844] 1977. “Critique of Hegel’s Dialectic and General Philosophy,” In Karl Marx: Selected Writings, edited by David McLellan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1846] 1994. “The German Ideology.” In Karl Marx: Early Political Writings, edited by Joseph O’Malley Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1867] 2011. Capital, Volume 1, translated by Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, W 2002. “The Poverty of Strategy: EP Thompson, Perry Anderson, and the Transition to Socialism.” Labour/Le Travail 50: 217–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L. 2007 Against Recognition. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meville, C. 2013. “The Stakes.” http://www.leninology.com/2013/01/the -stakes.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, M. 1969. The Hands of the Living God: An Account of a Psycho-analytic Treatment. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. [1964] 1984. “WutheringHeights:RomanticismandRationality.” In Women: The Longest Revolution, 127–144. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 1966. “Women: The Longest Revolution.” New Left Review 40: 11–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 1967 “Reply to Q. Hoare.” New Left Review 41: 81–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 1971. Women’s Estate. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 1973. “Female Sexuality.” Journal of Biosocial Science 5(1): 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 1974a. “Aspects ofFeminism.” In Women: The Longest Revolution, 77–126. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 1974b. Psychoanalysis and Feminism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. [1974c] 1984. “On Freud and The Distinction Between the Sexes.” In Women: The Longest Revolution, 221–232. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. and Rey. 1975. “Comment on ‘The Freudian Slip.’” New Left Review 94: 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. and Oakley, A. 1976. “Introduction” to The Rights And Wrongs of Women, 7–16. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. & Oakley, A. 1976. “Women and Equality.” In The Rights And Wrongs of Women, 379–399. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. [1982] 1984. “Femininity, Narrative and Psychoanalysis.” In Women: The Longest Revolution, 287–294. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 1983. “Psychoanalysis and Child Development.” New Left Review, 140: 92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 1986. “Reflections on Twenty Years of Feminism.” In What is Feminism, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 1988. “Angela McRobbie: An Interview with Juliet Mitchell”. New Left Review 170: 80–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 1999a. “Introduction, 1999” to Psychoanalysis and Feminism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 1999b. “Feminism and Psychoanalysis at the Millennium.” Women: A Cultural Review 10(2): 186–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 2000. Mad Men and Medusas. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 2002. “Reply to Lynne Segal’s Commentary.” Studies in Gender and Sexuality 3(2): 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. and Spigel, S. 2003. “The Power of Feelings.” Psychodynamic Practice 9(1): 87–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 2006. “From Infant to Child: The Sibling Trauma, the Rite de Passage, and the Construction of the ‘Other’ in the Social Group.” Fort Da 12: 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 2007 “On Asking Again: What Does a Woman Want?” In The Claims of Literature: The Shoshana Felman Reader, edited by Emily Sun, Eyal Peretz, and Ulrich Baer, 201–209. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 2008. “What Do We Mean by Gender Studies?”. Multidisciplinary Workshop at the University of Cambridge Centre for Gender Studies, January 22, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. 2011. “Emancipation in the Heart of Darkness: An Interview with Juliet Mitchell.” Platypus Review 38: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. [1937] 2001. The Road to Wigan Pier. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. [1946] 2002. ‘What is Socialism?’ In Essays. New York: Everyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. 1949. Nineteen Eighty-Four. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penny, L. 2013. “The SWP and Rape: Why I Care about This Marxist-Leninist Implosion.” Guardian, March 12, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, L. 2001. “Psychoanalysis and Politics: Juliet Mitchell, Then and Now.” Studies in Gender & Sexuality 2: 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swindells, J. and Jardine, L. 1990. What’s Left’? Women in Culture and the Labour Movement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, T. 2013. “Why I am Resigning.” http://www.cpgb.org.uk/home/weekly-worker/944/swp-why-i-am-resigning

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandschneider, D. 2010. “Dialectic as the “Self-Fulfilment” of Logic.” In The Dimensions of Hegel’s Dialectic, edited by Nectarious G. Limnatis. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. 1973. “Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory.” New Left Review 82: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. 1980. Problems in Materialism and Culture. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. 1982. “George Orwell.” In Culture and Society, 285–294. London: Hograth Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Robbie Duschinsky Susan Walker

Copyright information

© 2015 Robbie Duschinsky and Susan Walker

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duschinsky, R. (2015). Dialectic and Dystopia: “This might come as a shock…”. In: Duschinsky, R., Walker, S. (eds) Juliet Mitchell and the Lateral Axis. Palgrave Macmillan’s Critical Studies in Gender, Sexuality, and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137367792_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics