Skip to main content

A Life of their Own: Reflections on Autonomy and Ethics in Research-Based Theatre

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Performance, Madness and Psychiatry
  • 401 Accesses

Abstract

Although the stigma surrounding mental illness is often invisible, its effects are profound. As Heather Stuart (Bell Mental Health and Anti Stigma Research Chair at Queen’s University, Canada) recently stated, ‘Not a week goes by that I don’t hear a person with a mental illness tell me she or he wished they had had cancer because it is more acceptable. That breaks my heart.’1 Recognising that stigmatisation and the fear of stigmatisation often stop people with mental illness from seeking help, the issue has become a priority for governments and private organisa tions alike. A first step in dealing with the issue is to make stigma more visible both within the public realm and within the health care system itself. Stigma is embedded in beliefs, values and policies but it also shapes the way that health care providers care for those with mental illness. It makes effective care more difficult to obtain, no matter how much funding mental health attracts or how deeply committed the health care system is to finding solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jenefer Curtis, ‘New Research Chair Holder Seeks to Reduce Stigma Surrounding Mental Illness’, University Affairs, 2 April 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. George Belliveau and Graham Lea, ‘Research-Based Theatre in Education’, in Key Concepts in Theatre Drama Education, ed. by S. Schonnmann (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2011), pp. 332–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. James Thompson, Applied Theatre: Bewilderment and Beyond (Oxford: Peter Lang, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martha Nussbaum, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Ross Gray and Christina Sinding, Standing Ovation: Performing Social Science Research About Cancer (Walnut Creek, Lanham, New York, Oxford: AltaMira Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Mitchell, C. Jonas-Simpson and V. Ivonoffski, ‘Research-Based Theatre: The Making of I’m Still Here!’, Nursing Science Quarterly, 19 (2006), pp. 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Kontos and G. Naglie, ‘Expressions of Personhood in Alzheimer’s Disease: An Evaluation of Research-Based Theatre as a Pedagogical Tool’, Qualitative Health Research, 17 (2007), pp. 799–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jim Mienczakowski, Richard Smith and Mark Sinclair, ‘On the Road to Catharsis: A Theoretical Framework for Change’, Qualitative Inquiry, 2 (1996), pp. 439–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mark Johnson, Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), p. 287.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Wright Mills, The Sociological Imagination (New York: Oxford University Press, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Max Wyman, The Defiant Imagination: Why Culture Matters (Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre, 2004), p. 245.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martha Montello, ‘Narrative Competence’, in Stories and Their Limits: Narrative Approaches to Bioethics, ed. by Hilde Lindemann Nelson (New York: Routledge, 1997), pp. 185–97.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Augusto Boal, Legislative Theatre: Using Performance to Make Politics (London: Routledge, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martha C. Nussbaum, Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ross Gray, Margaret Fitch, Manon Labrecque and Marlene Greenberg, ‘Reactions of Health Professionals to a Research-Based Theatre Production’, Journal of Cancer Education, 18 (2003), pp. 223–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaime L. Beck, George Belliveau, Graham E. Lea and Amanda Wager, ‘Delineating a Spectrum of Research-Based Theatre’, Qualitative Inquiry, 17 (2011), pp. 687–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Rossiter, P. Kontos, A. Colantonio, J. Gilbert, J. Gray and M. Keightley, ‘Staging Data: Theatre as a Tool for Analysis and Knowledge Transfer in Health Research’, Social Science & Medicine, 66 (2008), pp. 130–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tom Barone and Elliott E. Eisner, Arts Based Research (Los Angeles: Sage, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Mienczakowski and T. Moore, ‘Performing Data with Notions of Responsibility’, in Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples and Issues, ed. by J.G. Knowles and A. Cole (Los Angeles: Sage, 2008), pp. 451–58.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jeff Nisker, Douglas K. Martin, Robyn Bluhm and Abdullah S. Daar, ‘Theatre as a Public Engagement Tool for Health-Policy Development’, Health Policy, 78 (2006), pp. 258–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vincent White and George Belliveau, ‘Whose Story it is it Anyway? Exploring Ethical Dilemmas in Performed Research’, Performing Ethos, 1 (2010), pp. 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jim Mienczakowski, ‘The Theater of Ethnography: The Reconstruction of Ethnography into Theater with Emancipatory Potential’, Qualitative Inquiry, 1 (1995), pp. 360–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Susan Sherwin, ‘Toward a Feminist Ethics of Health Care’, in No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics and Health Care, ed. by Susan Sherwin (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992), pp. 76–95.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eliza MacKenzie, ‘Drawing the Unknown’, 17 September 2010. <http://blogs.eciad.ca/elizabethmackenzie/?tag=relational-autonomy> [accessed 11 January 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mikhail M. Bakhtin, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, trans. V.W. McGee (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Catriona Mackenzie and Natalie Stoljar, eds, Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency and the Social Self (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jeff Nisker, From Calcedonies to Orchids: Plays Promoting Humanity in Health Policy (Toronto: Iguana, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Susan M. Cox, Magdalena Kazubowsk-Houston and Jeff Nisker, ‘Genetics on Stage: Theatre and Public Engagement in Health Policy Development’, Social Science & Medicine, 68 (2009), pp. 1472–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kat Kleman Davis, Jeffrey Sasha Davis and Lorraine Dowler, ‘In Motion, out of Place: The Public Space(S) of Tourette Syndrome’, Social Science & Medicine, 59 (2004), pp. 103–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Petra Kuppers (2000), ‘Towards the Unknown Body: Silence, Stillness, Space in Mental Health Settings,’ Theatre Topics, 10, 2 (2000), pp. 129–43, p. 130, p. 131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Anne Townsend McDonald, Susan M Cox, Darquise Lafreniere and Natasha Damiano Paterson, ‘Trust in Health Research Relationships: Accounts of Human Subjects’, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3 (2008), pp. 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Darquise Lafreniere, Susan M Cox, George Belliveau and Graham Lea, ‘Performing the Human Subject: Arts-Based Knowledge Dissemination in Health Research’, Journal of Applied Arts & Health, 3 (2012), pp. 243–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Joe Norris, Playbuilding as Qualitative Research: A Participatory Arts-Based Approach (Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vrenia Ivonoffski, Ross Gray and Christina Sinding, No Big Deal? (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Darquise Lafreniere and Susan M Cox, ‘Comparing Two Methods of Knowledge Dissemination: The Café Scientifique and the Artistic Performance’, Sociology Mind, 2 (2012), pp. 191–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. M Bakhtin, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. by M. Holquist (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981), pp. 121–2.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Arthur W. Frank, Letting Stories Breathe (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Susan M. Cox

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cox, S.M. (2014). A Life of their Own: Reflections on Autonomy and Ethics in Research-Based Theatre. In: Harpin, A., Foster, J. (eds) Performance, Madness and Psychiatry. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137337252_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics