Skip to main content

Culture and the State: From a Korean Perspective

  • Chapter
Cultural Policies in East Asia

Abstract

This chapter is intended to theorize the relationship between culture and the state in the Republic of Korea (hereafter Korea) by looking into the historical development of, and the recent controversies around, its arts policy. There are two reasons for the chapter’s focus on arts policy: firstly, preserving and developing the arts has traditionally been the main concern of Korean cultural policy; and secondly, the country’s arts sector, which hardly survives without state funding and lacks society-wide support, has developed a very tight relationship with the state. The inquiry starts with an observation of the rise of political intervention in the cultural sector in Korea under the conservative government of LEE Myung Bak (2008–2013). One noticeable example is that, when the government was inaugurated in 2008, the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (MCST) forced the heads of 15 public cultural institutions to resign, and dismissed some who refused to do so, in order to replace them with those deemed ideologically close to the government. It was argued by the opposition Democratic Party that such a political move was part of the government’s scheme to rebalance the power structure of the cultural sector: that is, to give power back to cultural practitioners and organizations with conservative traits, who were regarded as having been ignored by the previous two liberal governments (1998–2003 and 2003–2008).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett, O. (1997) ‘Cultural Policy, Cultural Pessimism and Postmodernity’, European Journal of Cultural Policy, 4(1), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, T. (1998) Culture: A Reformer’s Science (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993) The Field of Cultural Production (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, M.C. and Katz, R.S. (1989) ‘Relations between Government and the Arts in Western Europe and North America’, in M.C. Cummings and J.M.D. Schuster (eds), Who’s to Pay for the Arts: The International Search for Models of Arts Support (New York: American Council for the Arts), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J. (1986) ‘Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth-Century Boston’, in P.J. DiMaggio (ed.), Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts (Oxford: Open University Press), 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C.J. (1990–1991) ‘The South Korean Bourgeoisie: A Class in Search of Hegemony’, Journal of Korean Studies, 7, 115–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991) ‘Governmentality’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf), 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S.-J. (2010) ‘A Study on the Role of Ideology in the Film Supporting Policy: The Case of the Korean Film Council’, Korea Journal of Public Administration, 48(2), 309–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, J. and Gray, C.M. (1993) The Economics of Arts and Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman-Chartrand, H. and McCaughey, C. (1989) ‘The Arm’s Length Principle and the Arts: An International Perspective — Past, Present and Future’, in M.C. Cummings and J.M.D. Schuster (eds), Who’s to Pay for the Arts: The International Search for Models of Arts Support (New York: American Council for the Arts), 43–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, O. (2009) ‘No “Korean Wave” Here: Western Classical Music and the Changing Value System in South Korea’, Southeast Review of Asian Studies, 31, 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, O.-S. (2007) Norummachi (Seoul: Tree of Thought).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J.-M. (2008) ‘Middle Classes Imprisoned’, Hankyoreh 21, (699).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.-S. (2012) Cultural Policy and Cultural Control of Park Jung Hee Administration in the 1970s (Seoul: Sunin Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.-H. (2008) Cultural and Arts Policy of the New Government (Seoul: Jipmoondang).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.-W. (2009) An Analysis of Minyechong: Anti-American Warriors in the Cultural Sector (Seoul: CFE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. (2012) ‘Competition in Claiming for the Ownership of “the Korean”’, Society and History, 93, 185–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, H.-J. (1999) The Welfare State in Korea: The Politics of Legitimation (Basingstoke: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.-Y. (2010) The Age of Cultural Capital: The Logic of Formation of Cultural Capitals in Korea (Seoul: Culture Science).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-Y. (2005) Korean Intangible Cultural Property Policy: Its History and Future (Seoul: Kwan-dong Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.-K. (2008) ‘Uses of Civilising Claims: Three Moments in the British Theatre History’, Poetics, 36(4), 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.-K. (2012) ‘Progress without Consensus: “Instituting Arts Council in South Korea”’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 18(3), 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuigan, J. (2004) Rethinking Cultural Policy (Maidenhead: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • MCS [Ministry of Culture and Sports] (1995) Survey on Public Opinions (Seoul: MCS).

    Google Scholar 

  • MCST and KAMS [Korea Arts Management Service] (2010) Survey of Classical Music and Ballet Audiences (Seoul: MSCT and KAMS).

    Google Scholar 

  • MCST and KCTI [Korea Culture & Tourism Institute] (2010) Survey Report on Cultural Enjoyment (Seoul: MCST and KCTI).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Arts (2003) ‘How to Make Sense of “Cultural Power”’, National Arts, April, 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Korean History (2007) The Lives and Trajectories of Artists of Humble Classes (Seoul: Dusan Donga).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, M.-S. (1998) ‘Cultural Policy and National Culture Discourse in the 1960s and 1970s’, Comparative Cultural Studies, 4, 121–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öniş, Z. (1991) ‘The Logic of the Developmental State (Review)’, Comparative Politics, 24(1), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (eds) (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations (2nd edition) (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, K.-L. (1989). ‘The Meaning of the Birth of Minyechong’, Arts and Criticism, 15, 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindonga (2003) ‘“Move Forward Minyechong!; Move Backward Yechong!”’, Shindonga, 46(11), 258–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindonga (2006) ‘This is Worse than South Korea Conquered by North Korean Army’, Shindonga, 49(12), 230–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisa Journal (2008) ‘The Lost 10 Years and Recovering of Cultural Power: Who Will be Appointed as Cultural Minister?’, Sisa Journal, 925, 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toepler, S. and Zimmer, A. (2002) ‘Subsidizing the Arts: Government and the Arts in Western Europe and the United States’, in D. Crane, N. Kawashima and K. Kawasaki (eds), Global Culture: Media, Arts, Policy and Globalization (London: Routledge), 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vestheim, G. (1994) ‘Instrumental Cultural Policy in Scandinavian Countries: A Critical Historical Perspective’, European Journal of Cultural Policy, 1(1), 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voon, T. (2006) ‘The UNESCO and WTO: A Clash of Cultures?’, International and Comparative of Law Quarterly, 55(3), 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. (1998) The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G. and Wade, R. (1988) ‘Developmental States and Markets in East Asia’, in G. White (ed.), Developmental States in East Asia (Basingstoke: Macmillan), 1–29.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yechong (1979) Yechong White Paper (Seoul: Yechong).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, M. (1998) The History of the Korean Modern Theatre (Seoul: Taehaksa).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uoo, I. (2009) ‘Patronage of Performing Arts in Chosun Period’, in N. Park, J. Ryu, J. Song, I. Uoo, G. Cho and H. Park (eds), The History of Arts Patronage in Korea (Seoul: Mimesis), 175–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, A. and Toepler, S. (1996). ‘Cultural Politics and the Welfare State: The Case of Sweden, Germany, and the United States’, Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society, 26(3), 167–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Research (2010) Survey on Cultural Vision and Policy (Seoul: MCST).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Hye-Kyung Lee

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, HK. (2014). Culture and the State: From a Korean Perspective. In: Lee, HK., Lim, L. (eds) Cultural Policies in East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137327772_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics