Skip to main content

Analyzing European Media Policy: Stakeholders and Advocacy Coalitions

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of European Media Policy

Abstract

Media policy analysis seeks to ‘examine the ways in which policies in the field of communication are generated and implemented, as well as their repercussions or implications for the field of communication as a whole’ (Hansen et al., 1998, p. 67). Most critical academic media policy research is conducted ex post, tracing how certain policy outcomes came about, why certain policy outcomes rather than others became dominant, what parties were involved in the decision-making process, and how power was distributed among them (Fischer, 2003, 2008). As such, a rich tradition of research into media policy has developed, including analysis of media policies at the level of the EU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, M. and Weeds, H. (2007) ‘Public Service Broadcasting In the Digital World’, pp. 81–149 in: P. Seabright and J. von Hagen (eds.) The Economic Regulation of Broad-casting Markets: Evolving Technology and Challenges for Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bardoel, J. (2009) ‘Media Policy Between Europe and the Nation-State: The Case of the EU Broadcast Communication 2009’, paper presented at the ECREA Law and Policy Section Conference, Zurich, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardoel, J. and Lowe, G.F. (2007) ‘From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media: The Core Challenge’, pp. 7–26 in: G.F. Lowe and J. Bardoel (eds.) From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media RIPE@2007. Göteborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, S. (2006) ‘Public Service Broadcasting: A Manifestofor Survival in the Multimedia Age. (A Case Study of the BBCs New Charter)’, paper presented at the RIPE@ conference, Amsterdam, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, T. (2006) ‘Theories of the Media, Theories of Society’, pp. 11–29 in: M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, J. Curran and J. Woollacott (eds.) Culture, Society and the Media. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugha, R. and Varvasovszky, Z. (2000) ‘Stakeholder Analysis: A Review’, Health Policy and Planning, 15(3): 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carammia, M. (2009) ‘What Advocacy Coalition in the EU? The Determinants of Coalition Behaviour in EU Immigration Policy-Making’, paper presented at the 59th Political Studies Association Annual Conference, University of Manchester, 7–9 (April 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carboni, N. (2006) ‘Advocacy Groups in the Multilevel System of the European Union: a Case Study in Health Policy-Making’, OSE Working Paper Series. OSE/Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carboni, N. (2009) ‘Advocacy Groups in the Multilevel System of the European Union: A Case Study in Health Policy-Making’, Observatoire Social Eruopeén Research Paper, 1 (November), 35 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1994) Broadcasting and Audio-Visual Policy in the European Single Market, London: John Libbey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2011) ‘Public Value, the BBC and Humpty Dumpty Words — Does Public Value Management Mean What it Says?’, pp. 49–59 in: K. Donders and H. Moe (eds.) Exporting the Public Value Test: The Regulation of Public Broadcasters’ New Media Services Across Europe. Gothenburg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donders, K. (2012). Public Service Media and Policy in Europe, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donders, K. and Moe, H. (eds.) (2011) Exporting the Public Value Test: The Rgulation of Public Broadcasters’ New Media Services Across Europe, Götenborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donders, K. and Pauwels, C. (2008) ‘Does EU Policy Challenge the Digital Future of Public Service Broadcasting? An Analysis of the Commission’s State Aid Approach to Digitization and the Public Service Remit of Public Broadcasting Organizations’, Convergence, 14(3): 295–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donders, K. and Pauwels, C. (2010) ‘The Introduction of an Ex Ante Evaluation for New Media Services: Is “Europe” Asking for It, or Does Public Service Broadcasting Need It’, International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 6(2): 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, G. and Richardson, J. (1999) ‘Competing Advocacy Coalitions and the Process of “Frame Reflection”: A Longitunidnal Analysis of EU Steel Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 6: 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, F. (2007) ‘Analyzing Policy Learning in European Union Policy Formulation: The Advocacy Coalition Framework Meets New-Institutional Theory’, Bruges Political Research Papers, 5(November), 26 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2003) Reframing Policy Analysis: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D. (2008) The Politics of Media Policy, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G.P. (1995) ‘National Styles and Policy Sectors: Explaining Structured Variation’, Journal of Public Policy, 5(4): 467–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füg, O.C. (2009) ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework Goes to Europe: An American The-ory and its Application Across the Pond’, Paper prepared for the Annual Convention of the Political Studies Association Panel 115: Advocacy Coalitions and Democracy in Europe I. Manchester (UK): 7–9 April 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, N. (1990) Capitalism and Communication: Global Culture and the Economics of Information, London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. (1992) ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, 46(1): 1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A., Cottle, S., Negrine, R. and Newbold, C. (1998) Mass Communication Research Methods, London: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, A. (2005) The European Union and the Regulation of Media Markets, Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2004) ‘Administrative Styles and Regulatory Reform: Institutional Arrange-ments and their Effects on Administrative Behaviour’, International Public Management Journal, 7(3): 317–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. J. (1996) Mass Media and Media Policy in Western Europe, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobowicz, M. (2007) ‘Public Service Broadcasting in the 21st Century: What Chance for a New Beginning?’, pp. 29–50 in: G.F. Lowe and J. Bardoel (eds.) From Public Service Broadcasting to Public Service Media. Göteborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, P. (2003) ‘Is There Life After Policy Streams, Advocacy Coalitions, and Punctuations: Using Evolutionary Theory to Explain Policy Change?’, The Policy Studies Journal, 31(4): 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, E.A. (2001) Discerning Policy Influence: Framework for a Strategic Evaluation of IDRC-Supported Research, Victoria (BC): University of Victoria. Available at http://www.idre.ca/uploads/user-S/10359907080discerning_policy.pdf (accessed 17 November 2010).

  • McQuail, D. (2003) Media Accountability and Freedom of Publication, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., Agle, B. and Wood, D. (1997) ‘Towards a Theory of Stakeholder Identification: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, H. (2011) ‘Defining Public Service Beyond Broadcasting: The Legitimacy of Different Approaches’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 17(1): 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. and Parenta, O. (2008) ‘Explaining Contradictions in Film and Television Policy: Ideas and Incremental Policy Change through Layering and Drift’, Media, Culture and Society, 30(5): 609–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, C. and De Vinck, S. (2007) ‘De openbare omroep in nauwe schoentjes? Een blik op de impact van het liberaliseringsbeleid van de EU’, pp. 133–166 in: A. Dhoest and H. Van den Bulck (eds.) Publieke televisie in Vlaanderen: Een geschiedenis. Gent: Academia Press. [Public Service Broadcasting In Tight Shoes? An Insight into the impact of the EU’s Liberalisation Policy — Public Television in Flanders: A History]

    Google Scholar 

  • Prell, C., Hubacek, K. and Reed, M. (2009) ‘Stakeholder Analysis and Social Net-work Analysis in Natural Resource Management’, Society and Natural Resources, 22(6): 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pross, P. (1986) Group Politics and Public Policy, Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaglia, L. (2008) ‘Setting the Pace? Private Financial Interest and European Financial Market Integration’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 10: 46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C.M. (1999) ‘Harmful Tax Competition in the EU: Policy Narratives and Advocacy Coalitions’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 37: 661–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridinger, M. (2009) ‘The Public Service Remit and the New Media’, Iris, Legal Observations of the European Audiovisual Observatory, 6: 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P.A. (1998a) ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1): 98–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P.A. (1998b) ‘An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein’, Policy Sciences, 21: 129–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P.A. and Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P.A and Jenkins-Smith, H. (1999) ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment’, pp. 117–66 in P.A. Sabatier (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P.A. and Weibles, C.M. (2007) ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovation and Clarification’, pp. 159–220 in P. Sabatier (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, E, Peterson, T. and Schramm, W. (1956) Four Theories of the Press: The Authori-tarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility and Soviet Communist Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. and Steemers, J. (2007) ‘BBC To the Rescue: Digital Switchover and the Reinvention of Public Service Broadcasting in Britain’, Javnost— The Public, 14(1): 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltész, U. (2010) ‘Tighter State Aid Rules for Public TV Channels’, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 1(1): 32–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosics, N., Van de Ven R. and Riedl, A. (2008) ‘Funding of Public Service Broadcasting and State aid Rules — Two Recent Cases in Belgium and Ireland’, Competition Policy Newsletter, 3: 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Buick, H. (2001) ‘Public Service Broadcasting and National Identity as a Project of Modernity’, Media, Culture and Society, 23(1): 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Buick, H. (2007) ‘Old Ideas Meet New Technologies: Will Digitisation Save Public Service Broadcasting (Ideals) from Commercial Death?’, Sociology Compass, 1(1): 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Buick, H. (2008) ‘Can PSB Stake its Claim in a Media World of Digital Con-vergence? The Case of the Flemish PSB Management Contract Renewal from an International Perspective’, Convergence, 14(3): 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bulck, H. (2011) ‘Ex Ante test in Flanders: Making Ends Meet?’, pp. 155–163 in: K. Donders and H. Moe (eds.) Exporting the Public Value Test: the Regulation of Public Broadcasters’ Media Services Across Europe. Göteborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Buick, H. (2012) ‘Towards a Media Policy Process Analysis Model and Its Methodological Implications’, pp. 217–232 in: M. Puppis and N. Just (eds.) Trends in Communication Policy Research: New Theories, Methods and Subjects. Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H., Pollack, M.A. and Young, A.R. (2010) Policy Making in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weible, C.M. (2007) ‘An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding the Political Context of California Marine Protected Area Policy’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1): 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weible, C.M., Sabatier, P.A. and McQueen, K. (2009) ‘Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework’, Policy Studies Journal, 37(1): 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Hilde Van den Bulck and Karen Donders

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van den Bulck, H., Donders, K. (2014). Analyzing European Media Policy: Stakeholders and Advocacy Coalitions. In: Donders, K., Pauwels, C., Loisen, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of European Media Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032195_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics