Abstract
Yes. One of the most significant outcomes of the guaranteed income movement of the 1960s and 1970s was the federal government’s decision to conduct four experiments to see how the idea would work in practice.
Cash assistance programs would not cause a massive withdrawal of workers from the labor force, as many have feared. When combined with jobs, they would result in increased work effort. Any reduction in work effort caused by cash assistance would be more than offset by the increased employment opportunities provided in public service jobs.
—Conclusion of Seattle-Denver Negative Income Tax Experiment, February 1978, page xv, Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Widerquist, Karl, A Failure to Communicate: What If Anything Can We Learn from the Negative Income Tax Experiments; Essay for U.S. BIG Conference, NY, 2002. Sheahen, Allan, Guaranteed Income: The Right to Economic Security (Van Nuys, CA: GAIN Publications, 1983).
Office of Income Security Policy, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Overview of the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment, Final Report (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983).
Robins, P. K. “A Comparison of the Labor Supply Findings from the Four Negative Income Tax Experiments.” Journal of Human Resources 20, 4 (1985), 567–582.
Copyright information
© 2012 Allan Sheahen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sheahen, A. (2012). Has the Basic Income Guarantee Ever Been Tested?. In: Basic Income Guarantee. Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031594_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031594_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43481-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03159-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)