Skip to main content

From Humanitarian to Humanistic Work Psychology: The Morality of Business

  • Chapter
Humanitarian Work Psychology

Abstract

The first instances of humanitarian work psychology (HWP) have consisted of the application of the knowledge and methods of work psychology, as currently conceived, to avowedly humanitarian enterprises in which they have not previously been applied. It is suggested that that represents an unnecessarily self-limiting conceptualization of the field, and that we should strive to develop an expanded normative model of work psychology itself characterized by humanistic values. It is argued that such a model is not incompatible with furthering the ends of private sector corporations as their fundamental societal justification is also moral.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlstrom, D. (2010). ‘Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society’. Academy of Management Perspective, August, 10–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Humanist Association. (2003). Humanism and its aspirations: humanist manifesto III. Retrieved from http://www.americanhumanist.org/who_we_are/about_humanism/Humanist_Manifsto_III on 4 October 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Humanist Association. (2010). ‘About humanism’. Retrieved from http://www.americanhumanist.org/who_we_are/about_humanism 4 October 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2002). ‘Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct’. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoli, N. & Lefkowitz, J. (2009). ‘Individual and organizational antecedents of misconduct in organizations’. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 309–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrington, R. L. (1998). Western ethics: An historical introduction. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, L. L. & Trevino, L. K. (2008). ‘Introduction to special topic forum: Re-viewing organizational corruption’. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, P. A. & Pratt, M. G. (2010). ‘Moving forward by looking back: reclaiming unconventional research contexts and samples in organizational scholarship’. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 665–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baritz, L. (1960). The servants of power: A history of social science in American industry. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1989). A treatise on social justice: Vol. I. Theories of justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R. (1954). ‘Findings of the study’. In J. C. Bennett, H. R. Bowen, W. A. Brown & G. B. Oxnam (Eds), Christian values and economic life. (pp. 47–60). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S. C. (2007). ‘I/O psychology and poverty reduction: Past, present and future?’ The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 45(1), 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S. C. (2010a). ‘New diplomacies in corporate social responsibility’. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 48(1), 111–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S. C. (2010b). ‘Corporate social responsibility has gone global: The UN Global Compact’. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 48(2), 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S. C., McWha, I., MacLachlan, M. & Furnham, A. (2010). ‘Expatriate: Local remuneration differences across six cultures: Do they undermine poverty reduction work?’ International Journal of Psychology, 45(5) 321–340, Global Special Issue on Psychology and Poverty Reduction, Retrieved from http://poverty.massey.ac.nz/#global_issue.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). ‘Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct’. Business & Society, 38, 268–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, G. F. (1984). American business values, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesher, J. (2000). ‘The ethics of employment’. In T.R. Machan (Ed.), Morality and work (pp. 1–42). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press,

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C., Hartman, C. & Sklar, H. (1999). Divided decade: Economic disparity at the century’s turn. Boston, MA: United for a Fair Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conscious Capitalism Institute. (2010). ‘Conscious capitalism: Unleashing the power of passion and purpose’. Retrieved from http://www.cc-institute.com/cci/on 8 August 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R. (1993). Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danley, J. R. (1994). The role of the modern corporation in a free society. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGeorge, R. T. (1982). Corporations and moral responsibility. Business ethics, 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Cited in C.A. Brincat & V.S. Wike (2000). Morality and the professional life: Values at work. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A. (2010). ‘How can organizations be competitive but dare to care?’ Academy of Management Perspective, August, 24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. & Preston, L.E. (1995). ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications’. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwords, F. (2010). ‘What is humanism? Changing the world, one mind at a time…’ Retrieved from http://www.jen.com/humanism.html on 30 June 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest, J. (2010). ‘The Catholic worker movement’. Retrieved from http://www.catholicworker.org/historytext.cfm?Number=78 on 2 October 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • France, A. (2009). The red lily. Middlesex, UK: The Echo Library (First published, 1894).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C. (1995). Values, nature, and culture in the American corporation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). ‘The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’. The New York Times Magazine, Sept. 13, 32–3; 122; 124; 126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Damon, W. (2001). Good work: When excellence and ethics meet. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, S. W., Steiner, D. D. & Skarlicki, D. P. (Eds.) (2008). Justice, morality and social responsibility. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golombiewski, R.T. (1989). Men, management and morality: Toward a new organizational ethic. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronbacher, G. M. A. & Sirico, Rev. R. A. (2000). ‘Toward a personalist workplace ethic’. In T. R. Machan (Ed.), Morality and work. (pp. 43–72). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, G. (1973). A theology of liberation. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. S. & Lindzey, G. (1978). Theories of personality, 3rd edn. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., Asplund, J. W., Killham, E. A. & Agrawal, S. (2010). ‘Causal impact of employee work perceptions on the bottom line of organizations’. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 378–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, M. W. (Ed.) (1996). The morality of capitalism. Irvington-On-Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, A. H., Watrous-Rodriguez, K. M., Henning, J. B. & Berry, J. (2009). ‘’Working’ through environmental issues: The role of the I-O psychologist’. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 47(2), 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzell, R. A. & Austin, J. T. (1992). ‘From then to now: The development of industrial-organizational psychology in the United States’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 803–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1964). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich (First published 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, B. A. (1992). The ‘true professional ideal’ in America. Cambridge, MA.: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A. & Trevino, L. K. (2010). ‘Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser, A. (1947).’ Industrial psychology as management technique and as social science’. American Psychologist, 2, 224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, D. & Chamlee-Wright, E. (2000). Culture and enterprise. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. (1990). ‘The scientist-practitioner model is not enough’. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 28, 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. (2003). Ethics and values in industrial-organizational psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. (2005a). ‘The values of industrial-organizational psychology: Who are we?’ The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 43(2), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. (2005b). ‘Giving psychology away — but to whom?’, Society for industrial & organizational psychology (SIOP) 20th annual conference. Chair and presenter in a panel discussion. April 16, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. (2006). ‘The constancy of ethics amidst the changing world of work’. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 245–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. (2008). ‘To prosper, organizational psychology should … expand its values to match the quality of its ethics’. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 439–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. (2009a). ‘Promoting employee justice: It’s even worse than that!’ Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2(2), 221–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. (2009b). ‘Individual and organizational antecedents of misconduct in organizations: What do we (believe that we) know, and on what bases do we (believe that we) know it?’ In Burke & Cooper, (Eds), Research companion to corruption in organizations (pp. 60–91). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. (2010a). ‘Industrial-organizational psychology’s recurring identity crises: It’s a values issue!’ Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 293–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. (2010b). ‘Special section commentary 1. Can professions contribute to the reduction of world-wide poverty? A case in point: Organizational psychology and pay diversity’. International Journal of Psychology, 45(5), 371–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. (2011). ‘The science, practice and morality of work psychology’. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4(1), 112–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. & Lowman, R. L. (2009). ‘Ethics of employee selection’. In J. L. Farr and N. T. Tippins (Eds), Handbook of Employee Selection (pp. 571–90). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machan, T. R. (Ed.) (2000). Morality and work. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and personality (3rd edn). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. & Percheski, C. (2010). ‘Income inequality: New trends and research directions’. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, pp. 329–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelin, F. (2003). And why not?: The human person at the heart of business. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishina, Y., Dykes, B. J., Block, E. S. & Pollock, T. G. (2010). ‘Why ‘good’ firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality’. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 701–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchinsky, P. M. (2006). ‘Enhancing industrial/organizational psychology: a challenging mandate at the dawn of the 21st century’. Japanese Association of Industrial/Organizational Psychology Journal, 20, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L. & Rynes, S. L. (2003). ‘Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis’. Organization Studies, 24, 403–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J. (1993). The elements of moral philosophy, 2nd edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, A. (1964). The virtue of selfishness. New York, NY: Signet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1958). ‘Justice as fairness’. Philosophical Review, 67, 164–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S. J., Leavitt, K. & DeCelles, K. A. (2010). ‘Automatic ethics: The effects of implicit assumptions and contextual cues on moral behavior’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 752–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rockness, H. & Rockness, J. (2005). ‘Legislated ethics: From Enron to Sarbanes-Oxley, the impact on corporate America’. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1974). ‘In retrospect: Forty-six years’. American Psychologist, 29(2), 115–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A. (1995). Philosophy of social science, 2nd edn. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, J. (2001). ‘A guide to humanistic psychology. Association for Humanistic Psychology’. Retrieved from http://www.ahpweb.org/rowan_bibliography/on 30 June 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahakian, W.S. (Ed.) (1965). Psychology of personality: Readings in theory. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1995). Practical ethics, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1976). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. E. Cannan (Ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press (First published 1776).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, G. C. & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Assessment centers in human resource management: Strategies for prediction, diagnosis and development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B. & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). ‘Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, Y. & Weitz, E. (2004). Misbehavior in organizations: Theory, research and management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardy, P. (1989). Business morality: People and Profit. London: Marshal Pickering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. M. & Rupp, D. E. (2011). ‘Experiencing work: An essay on a person-centric work psychology’. Industrial an organizational psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younkins, E. W. (2010a). ‘The reality and morality of business’. Rebirth of Reason. Retrieved from http://rebirthofreason.com/Articles/Younkins/The_Reality_and_Morality_of_Business.shtml on 7 June 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younkins, E. W. (2010b). ‘Capitalism: The only moral social system’. Rebirth of Reason. Retrieved from http://rebirthofreason.com/Articles/Younkins/Capitalism_The_Only_Moral_Social_System.shtml on 7 June 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younkins, E. W. (2010c). ‘Ayn Rand, human flourishing, and virtue ethics’. Rebirth of Reason. Retrieved from http://rebirthofreason.com/Articles/Younkins/Ayn_Rand,_Human_Flourishing,_and_Virtue_Ethics.shtml on 7 June 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zickar, M. J. & Gibby, R. E. (2007). ‘Four persistent themes throughout the history of I-O psychology in the United States’. In L. Koppes (Ed.), Historical perspectives in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 61–80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Joel Lefkowitz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Letkowitz, J. (2012). From Humanitarian to Humanistic Work Psychology: The Morality of Business. In: Carr, S.C., MacLachlan, M., Furnham, A. (eds) Humanitarian Work Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015228_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics