Abstract
This book has staked the claim that cultures matter in transboundary relations. More precisely, it has been argued that the four ways of life (or cultures) that are distinguished in grid-group theory (egalitarianism, fatalism, individualism and hierarchy) are useful ideal types with which to describe and explain the thoughts and actions of actors involved in transboundary regimes. Different regime actors have alternative perceptions of how transboundary relations should be organized, have divergent reactions to international anarchy, have varying perceptions of transboundary issues and disagree on how transboundary issues should he tackled.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A. B. Wildavsky, ‘Resolved, That Individualism and Egalitarianism Be Made Compatible in America: Political-Cultural Roots of Exceptionalism’, in B. E. Shafer (ed.), Is America Different? A New Look at American Exceptionalism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991);
R. J. Ellis, American Political Cultures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993);
D. J. Elazar, The American Mosaic: The Impact of Space, Time and Culture on American Politics (Boulder. CO: Westview Press. 1994).
R. D. Putnam, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2000 Marco Verweij
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verweij, M. (2000). Conclusion: Cultures and Institutions Both Matter in Transboundary Relations. In: Transboundary Environmental Problems and Cultural Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333981801_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333981801_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42317-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-333-98180-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)