Abstract
Various strategies are used by Cocteau in The Infernal Machine to convey his reading of the Oedipus myth and bring out, in an encoded form, its relevance for modern audiences. The monster, a figure emblematic of the fantastic, serves as a paradigm that informs not only Cocteau’s argument but also the whole play as a poetic work. The play mixes the comic with the tragic and the pathetic, intertextuality with camp, parody with satire and pastiche, and poetry with slang and clichés. In addition, the specificity of the theatre as an artistic medium is masterfully put to use, with movement (acting), forms, volumes, and colors (settings, lighting, props, and costumes) serving not only as semiotic signs to illustrate or supplement the written text but also to direct the reader’s or the spectator’s response. The play amuses, stirs emotions, throws a new light on the ancient myth, and raises haunting questions about traditionally sacred values. The uniqueness of Cocteau’s treatment of the Oedipus myth in The Infernal Machine consists in its blending an amused perspective on human affairs with a deeply affecting existential despair. The play is a tragedy clad in comic attire.
Is art reasonable? If it is, then theatre is only a lie that consists in letting us believe that we are what we are not. But if art is unreasonable, then it [theatre] ceases to cheat the world. It becomes a new, mysterious and marvelous form of truth.
—Cocteau, L’Impromptu du Palais Royal (The Impromptu of Palais Royal) (1962)1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Brian Richardson, “Voice and Narration in Postmodern Drama,” New Literary History 32, no. 3 (2001): 683.
Ruth Amossy and Elisheva Rosen, Les Discours du Cliché (Paris: SEDES, 1982), 22.
Francis Steegmuller, Cocteau. A Biography (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1970), 240, 387.
Susan Sontag, “Notes on ‘Camp,’” in Against Interpretation (New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1964), 279.
See, for example, Matthew Tinkcom, Working like a Homosexual: Camp, Capital Cinema (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002).
See also Fabio Cleto, “Introduction: Queering the Camp,” in Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject. A Reader, ed. Fabio Cleto (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999), 9.
Ian Lucas, Impertinent Decorum: Gay Theatrical Manoeuvres (New York: Cassell, 1994), 118.
John M. Clum, Acting Gay: Male Homosexuality in Modern Drama (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992), 151, 154.
See Margaret Rose’s study Parody: Ancient, Modern and Post-modern (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).
See Fredric Jameson, “Postmodernism and Consumer Society,” The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, ed. Hal Foster (Washington, DC: Bay Press, 1983), 113.
Linda Hutcheon, “The Politics of Postmodern Parody,” in Intertextuality, ed. Heinrich F. Plett (Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1991), 225.
Marjorie Perloff, 21st Century Modernism: The “New” Poetics (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2002), 1–2.
See Schlumberger, 873–875; Neal Oxenhandler, Scandal and Parade: The Theater of J. Cocteau (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1957), 129–158;
Angela Belli, Ancient Greek Myths and Modern Drama: A Study in Continuity (New York: New York University Press, 1969), 5–35; Brosse, 85; Claude Martin, “Gide, Cocteau, Oedipe: le mythe ou le complexe,” Revue des Lettres Modernes, no. 298–303 (1972/3): 155–162;
Milorad, “Romans jumeaux ou de l’imitation,” Cahiers Jean Cocteau, 8 (1979): 101;
Clément Borgal, Jean Cocteau, ou De la claudication considérée comme l’un des beaux-arts (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1989), 77–104; Leadbeater, 124; Lowe, 158–216;
Anne Clancier, “Jean Cocteau et les Mythes,” in Mythes et Psychanalyse, ed. Anne Clancier and Cléopâtre Athanassiou-Popesco (Paris: Arnaud Dupin et Serge Perrot, 1997), 155–163;
Bernard Combeaud, La Machine Infernale de Cocteau: Etude de l’oeuvre (Paris: Hachette, 1998), 28; Delattre, 74–77; Jean Touzot, Jean Cocteau, Le Poète et ses doubles, 124–126;
Philippe Grandjean, La Machine Infernale: Jean Cocteau” (Paris: Hatier, 2002), 89–124;
Bertrand de Chambon, Le Roman de Jean Cocteau (Paris, L’Harmattan, 2001). For a Lacanian approach, see Jejcic.
See Franco Tonelli, “Edipo, la rapprezentatione e la macchina infernale,” Il Lettore di Provincia 15, no. 61 (June–September 1985): 5–13;
Dominique Paini, “L’Homme invisible,” in Cocteau, Catalog of the exhibition “Jean Cocteau, sur le fil du siècle” (Paris: Centre Pompidou, 2003), 279.
Copyright information
© 2008 Irene Eynat-Confino
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eynat-Confino, I. (2008). Dramatic Strategies and Stratagems. In: On the Uses of the Fantastic in Modern Theatre. Palgrave Studies Theatre and Performance History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616967_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616967_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37496-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-61696-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)