Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies Theatre and Performance History ((PSTPH))

  • 55 Accesses

Abstract

Various strategies are used by Cocteau in The Infernal Machine to convey his reading of the Oedipus myth and bring out, in an encoded form, its relevance for modern audiences. The monster, a figure emblematic of the fantastic, serves as a paradigm that informs not only Cocteau’s argument but also the whole play as a poetic work. The play mixes the comic with the tragic and the pathetic, intertextuality with camp, parody with satire and pastiche, and poetry with slang and clichés. In addition, the specificity of the theatre as an artistic medium is masterfully put to use, with movement (acting), forms, volumes, and colors (settings, lighting, props, and costumes) serving not only as semiotic signs to illustrate or supplement the written text but also to direct the reader’s or the spectator’s response. The play amuses, stirs emotions, throws a new light on the ancient myth, and raises haunting questions about traditionally sacred values. The uniqueness of Cocteau’s treatment of the Oedipus myth in The Infernal Machine consists in its blending an amused perspective on human affairs with a deeply affecting existential despair. The play is a tragedy clad in comic attire.

Is art reasonable? If it is, then theatre is only a lie that consists in letting us believe that we are what we are not. But if art is unreasonable, then it [theatre] ceases to cheat the world. It becomes a new, mysterious and marvelous form of truth.

—Cocteau, L’Impromptu du Palais Royal (The Impromptu of Palais Royal) (1962)1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Brian Richardson, “Voice and Narration in Postmodern Drama,” New Literary History 32, no. 3 (2001): 683.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ruth Amossy and Elisheva Rosen, Les Discours du Cliché (Paris: SEDES, 1982), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Francis Steegmuller, Cocteau. A Biography (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1970), 240, 387.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Susan Sontag, “Notes on ‘Camp,’” in Against Interpretation (New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1964), 279.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, for example, Matthew Tinkcom, Working like a Homosexual: Camp, Capital Cinema (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. See also Fabio Cleto, “Introduction: Queering the Camp,” in Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject. A Reader, ed. Fabio Cleto (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ian Lucas, Impertinent Decorum: Gay Theatrical Manoeuvres (New York: Cassell, 1994), 118.

    Google Scholar 

  8. John M. Clum, Acting Gay: Male Homosexuality in Modern Drama (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992), 151, 154.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Margaret Rose’s study Parody: Ancient, Modern and Post-modern (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Fredric Jameson, “Postmodernism and Consumer Society,” The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, ed. Hal Foster (Washington, DC: Bay Press, 1983), 113.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Linda Hutcheon, “The Politics of Postmodern Parody,” in Intertextuality, ed. Heinrich F. Plett (Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1991), 225.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marjorie Perloff, 21st Century Modernism: The “New” Poetics (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2002), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Schlumberger, 873–875; Neal Oxenhandler, Scandal and Parade: The Theater of J. Cocteau (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1957), 129–158;

    Google Scholar 

  14. Angela Belli, Ancient Greek Myths and Modern Drama: A Study in Continuity (New York: New York University Press, 1969), 5–35; Brosse, 85; Claude Martin, “Gide, Cocteau, Oedipe: le mythe ou le complexe,” Revue des Lettres Modernes, no. 298–303 (1972/3): 155–162;

    Google Scholar 

  15. Milorad, “Romans jumeaux ou de l’imitation,” Cahiers Jean Cocteau, 8 (1979): 101;

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clément Borgal, Jean Cocteau, ou De la claudication considérée comme l’un des beaux-arts (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1989), 77–104; Leadbeater, 124; Lowe, 158–216;

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anne Clancier, “Jean Cocteau et les Mythes,” in Mythes et Psychanalyse, ed. Anne Clancier and Cléopâtre Athanassiou-Popesco (Paris: Arnaud Dupin et Serge Perrot, 1997), 155–163;

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bernard Combeaud, La Machine Infernale de Cocteau: Etude de l’oeuvre (Paris: Hachette, 1998), 28; Delattre, 74–77; Jean Touzot, Jean Cocteau, Le Poète et ses doubles, 124–126;

    Google Scholar 

  19. Philippe Grandjean, La Machine Infernale: Jean Cocteau” (Paris: Hatier, 2002), 89–124;

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bertrand de Chambon, Le Roman de Jean Cocteau (Paris, L’Harmattan, 2001). For a Lacanian approach, see Jejcic.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Franco Tonelli, “Edipo, la rapprezentatione e la macchina infernale,” Il Lettore di Provincia 15, no. 61 (June–September 1985): 5–13;

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dominique Paini, “L’Homme invisible,” in Cocteau, Catalog of the exhibition “Jean Cocteau, sur le fil du siècle” (Paris: Centre Pompidou, 2003), 279.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Irene Eynat-Confino

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eynat-Confino, I. (2008). Dramatic Strategies and Stratagems. In: On the Uses of the Fantastic in Modern Theatre. Palgrave Studies Theatre and Performance History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616967_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics