Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies Theatre and Performance History ((PSTPH))

  • 56 Accesses

Abstract

The visual and emotional impact of the Sphinx, the paradigmatic monster, extends beyond the time limits of Act II of The Infernal Machine, stirring an unsettling question. If this innocent-looking girl is none other than a monster in disguise, what lurks beneath the appearance of the other human characters in Cocteau’s interpretation of the Oedipus myth? A closer investigation shows that Tiresias, Jocasta, and Laius (whose ghost appears in Act I) belong to the monster category as well. Tiresias does so literally, Jocasta and Laius metaphorically.

policeman, to Therese/Tiresias’ husband: Madam or Mister, I am madly in love with you. And I want to be your husband.

husband, sneezes: But can’t you see that I am a man?

policeman: I can nevertheless marry you by proxy.

husband: That’s silly. You could better make children…. Come back this evening and see how nature will give me children with no need of a woman.

—Apollinaire, The Breasts of Tiresias1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Guillaume Apollinaire, Les Mamelles de Tirésias (The Breasts of Tiresias), in Oeuvres Poétiques (Paris: Gallimard, 1965), 895, 897.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paul M. C. Forbes Irving, Metamorphosis in Greek Myth (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), 72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arlette Lafont, “Autour des Mamelles de Tirésias,” La Revue des Lettres Modernes, no. 123–126 (1965): 8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See also Annabelle Melzer, Dada and Surrealist Performance (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1994), 122–135;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Claude Schumacher, Alfred Jarry and Guillaume Apollinaire (New York: Grove Press, 1985), 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The poem is included in Correspondance Guillaume Apollinaire Jean Cocteau, ed. Pierre Caizergues and Michel DĂ©caudin (Cahors: Jean-Michel Place, 1991), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jacques Brosse, Cocteau (Paris: Gallimard, 1970), 84.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Judith G. Miller, “Jean Cocteau and Hélène Cixous: Oedipus,” in Drama, Sex, and Politics, ed. James Redmond (Cambridge University Press, 1985), 206.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jean Touzot, Jean Cocteau, Le Poète et ses doubles (Paris: Bartillat, 2000), 124–127.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mitsutaka Odagiri, Écritures Palimpsestes, ou Les théâtralisations françaises du mythe d’Oedipe (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2001), 167, 171.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Segal, Charles. “Oedipus through the Ages,” Review Article, International Journal of the Classical Tradition 7, no. 2 (Fall 2000): 221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Irene Eynat-Confino

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eynat-Confino, I. (2008). Laius, Tiresias, and Jocasta. In: On the Uses of the Fantastic in Modern Theatre. Palgrave Studies Theatre and Performance History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230616967_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics