Abstract
After waging war for almost three years against an elusive enemy, many American commanders in the Philippine islands were frustrated. The United States had entered the archipelago after its brief, triumphant war against Spain in 1898. However, in addition to gaining a colony, the United States also inherited Spain’s war against a Filipino army determined to win independence. Unwilling to surrender its prize, the United States won a brief conventional war against its outmatched opponent and declared victory, only to find that the war had entered a nonconventional phase in which Filipino nationalists established a shadow government and fought a tenacious guerrilla campaign against the U.S. Army. To break the resistance, the Americans employed a strategy that combined military pressure with benevolent policies. By 1901, the resistance had been confined to a pair of provinces, but in those provinces the war took an ugly turn. Filipino insurgents increasingly employed terrorist tactics to force cooperation from a war-weary populace and to combat the occupying forces. Impatient American officers, chafing under limiting rules of engagement, chose to use terror to eliminate stubborn pockets of resistance. In both cases, isolated atrocities and uses of terror in the early months of the war would be used to justify more systematic terrorist activities in the final weeks of the conflict.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Adjutant General’s Office, “Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field,” General Orders No. 100 (1863), http://www.yale.edulawweb/avalon/lieber.htm#sec9.
As Brian Linn clearly explains in his preface to The Philippine War, 1899–1902 (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2000), the terminology of this war easily gives offense. He chose the neutral “Philippine War” over the Filipino-American War or Philippine Insurrection and chose to use the terms “resistance,” “insurrectos,” “insurgents,” “guerrillas,” and “revolutionaries” to refer to Filipinos who sought independence through armed conflict with the United States. This chapter will follow his example.
David Trask, The War with Spain in 1898 (New York: Macmillan, 1981), 8–9.
Hoar quoted in H. Wayne Morgan, America’s Road to Empire (New York: John Wiley, 1965), 63.
McKinley quoted in Lewis L. Gould, The Spanish American War and President McKinley (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1982), 111.
U.S. Senate, Affairs in the Philippines: Hearing before the Committee on the Philippines (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1902), 347.
McKinley quoted in Gould, President McKinley, 119. This approach has evolved over time to include the 1960s’ modernization theory and nation-building efforts in several developing nations, including the Dominican Republic, Vietnam, and, most recently, Iraq and Afghanistan. The Philippine Centennial Celebration, Documents of the Philippine-American War, “Address by President William McKinley, December 21, 1898,” http://www.msc.edu.phcentennial/benevolent.html.
Michael Hunt, Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987), 81.
New York Times, July 18, 1900; For Roosevelt’s logic, which was widely imitated in the imperialist press, see the Chicago Daily Tribune, September 18, 1900.
For examples of the chiefs and tribes language, see New York Times, October 26, 1900, February 8, 1899, and January 11, 1902; New York Times, December 13, 1899; General Samuel Young quoted in Linn, Philippine War, 211.
African Americans were caught between conflicting interests. As American citizens, they felt obligated to do their duty and serve in Cuba and Philippines; at the same time, they empathized with colored peoples being subjugated by white society in a situation much like their own. For more on African American viewpoints, see William Gatewood, Jr., Black Americans and the White Man’s Burden (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1975).
Schurz quoted in Stuart Creighton Miller, “Benevolent Assimilation”: The American Conquest of the Philippines, 1899–1903 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982), 124.
Glenn May, Battle for Batangas: A Philippine Province at War (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991), 155.
Corbin to Otis, December 4, 1898, Correspondence Relating to the War with Spain, April 15, 1898–June 30, 1902 (Washington, 1902), 2: 850.
For a concise description of the Army’s efforts in Manila, see John Morgan Gates, Schoolbooks and Krags: The United States Army in the Philippines, 1898–1902 (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1973), 54–70.
Quoted in Linn, Philippine War, 187.
General Orders, No. 38, Correspondence, 2: 1154–1155; Linn, Philippine War, 199.
Captain John L. Jordan quoted in May, Battle for Batangas, 142–143.
New York Times, December 15, 1899.
U.S. Senate, Affairs in the Philippines, 139.
Adjutant General’s Office, General Orders No. 100.
Linn, Philippine War, 221–222; U.S. Senate, Affairs in the Philippines, 135–136.
Miller, “Benevolent Assimilation,” 182–184.
Quoted in Linn, Philippine War, 187.
Gates, Schoolbooks and Krags, 171; Linn, Philippine War, 209.
Smith quoted in Linn, Philippine War, 212.
Adjutant General’s Office, General Orders No. 100.
Gates, Schoolbooks and Krags, 205–206.
MacArthur to Corbin, December 25, 1900, Corbin to MacArthur, December 26, 1900, Correspondence, 2:1237–1238.
MacArthur to Corbin, January 4, 1901, Correspondence, 2:1241.
Gates, Schoolbooks and Krags, 209; Corbin to MacArthur, December 26, 1900, Correspondence, 2
The Outlook, October 12, 1901, 341.
May argues that Batangas would have experienced a “mortality crisis” caused by malnutrition and malaria regardless of the concentration policy; Bell’s zones only exacerbated the crisis. May, Battle for Batangas, 262–267.
Brian Linn, “The Struggle for Samar,” in Crucible of Empire: The Spanish-American War and Its Aftermath, ed. James C. Bradford (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1993), 158–176; Gates, Schoolbooks and Krags, 253–256.
New York Times, February 6, 1902; see also the Chicago Daily Tribune, May 18, 1902.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Isaac Land
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coats, J. (2008). Half Devil and Half Child: America’s War with Terror in the Philippines, 1899–1902. In: Land, I. (eds) Enemies of Humanity. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612549_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612549_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37231-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-61254-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)