Skip to main content

Half Devil and Half Child: America’s War with Terror in the Philippines, 1899–1902

  • Chapter
Enemies of Humanity

Abstract

After waging war for almost three years against an elusive enemy, many American commanders in the Philippine islands were frustrated. The United States had entered the archipelago after its brief, triumphant war against Spain in 1898. However, in addition to gaining a colony, the United States also inherited Spain’s war against a Filipino army determined to win independence. Unwilling to surrender its prize, the United States won a brief conventional war against its outmatched opponent and declared victory, only to find that the war had entered a nonconventional phase in which Filipino nationalists established a shadow government and fought a tenacious guerrilla campaign against the U.S. Army. To break the resistance, the Americans employed a strategy that combined military pressure with benevolent policies. By 1901, the resistance had been confined to a pair of provinces, but in those provinces the war took an ugly turn. Filipino insurgents increasingly employed terrorist tactics to force cooperation from a war-weary populace and to combat the occupying forces. Impatient American officers, chafing under limiting rules of engagement, chose to use terror to eliminate stubborn pockets of resistance. In both cases, isolated atrocities and uses of terror in the early months of the war would be used to justify more systematic terrorist activities in the final weeks of the conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Adjutant General’s Office, “Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field,” General Orders No. 100 (1863), http://www.yale.edulawweb/avalon/lieber.htm#sec9.

  2. As Brian Linn clearly explains in his preface to The Philippine War, 1899–1902 (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2000), the terminology of this war easily gives offense. He chose the neutral “Philippine War” over the Filipino-American War or Philippine Insurrection and chose to use the terms “resistance,” “insurrectos,” “insurgents,” “guerrillas,” and “revolutionaries” to refer to Filipinos who sought independence through armed conflict with the United States. This chapter will follow his example.

    Google Scholar 

  3. David Trask, The War with Spain in 1898 (New York: Macmillan, 1981), 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoar quoted in H. Wayne Morgan, Americas Road to Empire (New York: John Wiley, 1965), 63.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McKinley quoted in Lewis L. Gould, The Spanish American War and President McKinley (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1982), 111.

    Google Scholar 

  6. U.S. Senate, Affairs in the Philippines: Hearing before the Committee on the Philippines (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1902), 347.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McKinley quoted in Gould, President McKinley, 119. This approach has evolved over time to include the 1960s’ modernization theory and nation-building efforts in several developing nations, including the Dominican Republic, Vietnam, and, most recently, Iraq and Afghanistan. The Philippine Centennial Celebration, Documents of the Philippine-American War, “Address by President William McKinley, December 21, 1898,” http://www.msc.edu.phcentennial/benevolent.html.

  8. Michael Hunt, Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987), 81.

    Google Scholar 

  9. New York Times, July 18, 1900; For Roosevelt’s logic, which was widely imitated in the imperialist press, see the Chicago Daily Tribune, September 18, 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For examples of the chiefs and tribes language, see New York Times, October 26, 1900, February 8, 1899, and January 11, 1902; New York Times, December 13, 1899; General Samuel Young quoted in Linn, Philippine War, 211.

    Google Scholar 

  11. African Americans were caught between conflicting interests. As American citizens, they felt obligated to do their duty and serve in Cuba and Philippines; at the same time, they empathized with colored peoples being subjugated by white society in a situation much like their own. For more on African American viewpoints, see William Gatewood, Jr., Black Americans and the White Mans Burden (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schurz quoted in Stuart Creighton Miller, “Benevolent Assimilation”: The American Conquest of the Philippines, 1899–1903 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982), 124.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glenn May, Battle for Batangas: A Philippine Province at War (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991), 155.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Corbin to Otis, December 4, 1898, Correspondence Relating to the War with Spain, April 15, 1898–June 30, 1902 (Washington, 1902), 2: 850.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For a concise description of the Army’s efforts in Manila, see John Morgan Gates, Schoolbooks and Krags: The United States Army in the Philippines, 1898–1902 (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1973), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quoted in Linn, Philippine War, 187.

    Google Scholar 

  17. General Orders, No. 38, Correspondence, 2: 1154–1155; Linn, Philippine War, 199.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Captain John L. Jordan quoted in May, Battle for Batangas, 142–143.

    Google Scholar 

  19. New York Times, December 15, 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  20. U.S. Senate, Affairs in the Philippines, 139.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Adjutant General’s Office, General Orders No. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Linn, Philippine War, 221–222; U.S. Senate, Affairs in the Philippines, 135–136.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miller, “Benevolent Assimilation,” 182–184.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Quoted in Linn, Philippine War, 187.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gates, Schoolbooks and Krags, 171; Linn, Philippine War, 209.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smith quoted in Linn, Philippine War, 212.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Adjutant General’s Office, General Orders No. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gates, Schoolbooks and Krags, 205–206.

    Google Scholar 

  29. MacArthur to Corbin, December 25, 1900, Corbin to MacArthur, December 26, 1900, Correspondence, 2:1237–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  30. MacArthur to Corbin, January 4, 1901, Correspondence, 2:1241.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gates, Schoolbooks and Krags, 209; Corbin to MacArthur, December 26, 1900, Correspondence, 2

    Google Scholar 

  32. The Outlook, October 12, 1901, 341.

    Google Scholar 

  33. May argues that Batangas would have experienced a “mortality crisis” caused by malnutrition and malaria regardless of the concentration policy; Bell’s zones only exacerbated the crisis. May, Battle for Batangas, 262–267.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Brian Linn, “The Struggle for Samar,” in Crucible of Empire: The Spanish-American War and Its Aftermath, ed. James C. Bradford (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1993), 158–176; Gates, Schoolbooks and Krags, 253–256.

    Google Scholar 

  35. New York Times, February 6, 1902; see also the Chicago Daily Tribune, May 18, 1902.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Isaac Land

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coats, J. (2008). Half Devil and Half Child: America’s War with Terror in the Philippines, 1899–1902. In: Land, I. (eds) Enemies of Humanity. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612549_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612549_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37231-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-61254-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics