Abstract
The Massachusetts Public Sector Collective Bargaining Law was designed as a progressive reform allowing public school teachers a voice for improved salaries and working conditions. The goal was to bring civil discourse to public sector employee discussions and to prevent strikes in schools. Potentially it might revive teacher participation in school decision-making, as was done briefly in the 1920s. What was the impact of giving Boston teachers a formal voice in school decisions?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Charles Perry and Wesley Wildman, The Impact of Negotiations on Public Education (Worthington, Ohio, 1970)
and Ronald Corwin, Militant Professionals (New York, 1970), 54.
Cronin, The Control of Urban Schools (New York, 1973), 103
and Martin Mayer, Teachers Strike (New York, 1969), 193.
Alan Rosenthal, Pedagogues and Power (Syracuse, 1969), 86, 87.
Kenneth Rossano, The Boston Experience (Boston, 1986).
Boston Plan for Excellence, Towards an Open Teacher Hiring Process (Boston 2000), with quotes in the Boston Globe, March 28, 30, 2000.
Jane Hathaway and Andrew Rotherham, editors, Collective Bargaining in Education (Cambridge, 2006).
Myron Lieberman, Education as a Profession (Norman, Oklahoma, 1956).
David B. Tyack, The One Best System (Cambridge, 1974).
Copyright information
© 2008 Joseph Marr Cronin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cronin, J.M. (2008). The Organized Teacher Voice (1965 to the Present). In: Reforming Boston Schools, 1930 to the Present. Palgrave Studies in Urban Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230611092_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230611092_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-11145-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-61109-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)