Skip to main content
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter, I have shown that some absolutist accounts of principled moral can be interpreted as giving imagination a necessary role next to principles. In my discussion of interpretations of Kant, Arendt, Murdoch, and Levinas, I have argued that these frameworks need to rely on such a role for imagination to be fully intelligible. Nevertheless there remain serious problems with these theories. In this chapter, I will further discuss these problems and explore possibilities for reconciling the moral sentiment approach with the Kantian-universalist approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 Mark Coeckelbergh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coeckelbergh, M. (2007). Limits. In: Imagination and Principles. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230589803_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics