Abstract
In the previous chapter, I have shown that some absolutist accounts of principled moral can be interpreted as giving imagination a necessary role next to principles. In my discussion of interpretations of Kant, Arendt, Murdoch, and Levinas, I have argued that these frameworks need to rely on such a role for imagination to be fully intelligible. Nevertheless there remain serious problems with these theories. In this chapter, I will further discuss these problems and explore possibilities for reconciling the moral sentiment approach with the Kantian-universalist approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2007 Mark Coeckelbergh
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coeckelbergh, M. (2007). Limits. In: Imagination and Principles. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230589803_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230589803_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-55280-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58980-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)