Skip to main content

Women Only Leadership Development: A Conundrum

  • Chapter
Leadership Learning

Abstract

In its only concession to affirmative action, the Sex Discrimination Act of 1975 made a provision for women only training programmes. In 1986 British Telecommunications led the way in the corporate world by introducing a two-week residential programme with Cranfield School of Management for women managers facing the glass ceiling. The programme ran three times a year for 13 years. Today most major organisations committed to diversity have a women’s management programme in their training portfolio. In the 90s Cranfield pioneered two public programmes for women managers — a leadership programme and a management development one. In only the last few years have other major business schools, like Harvard, Insead and IMD, followed suit by introducing programmes for women managers/leaders. The availability of so many programmes, however, has not dampened the debate on whether women need women only management development. In this chapter we review the lack of women in leadership, and the challenges faced by women on MBA programmes. We then look at the nature of women’s careers and women’s development. We argue the case for women only development and conclude with a case study of a programme we ran for our cohort of female MBA students in 2007.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • V. Anderson, ‘Women managers: Does positive action training make a difference? A case study’, Journal of Management Development, 23(8) (2004) 729–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.B. Arthur and D.M. Rousseau, The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Baruch and M. Peiperl, ‘The impact of an MBA on graduate careers’, Human Resource Management Journal, 10(2) (2000) 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Brenner, L. Godwin, D. Bilimoria, D. O’Neil and S.K. Piderit, ‘Turning a blind eye: Executive women conforming to the gendered organization’, Part of Symposium proposal on ‘Women above the glass ceiling: Collusion, voice and exit’ (US: Atlanta, Academy of Management Annual Meeting, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst, Women and the MBA: Gateway to Opportunity (New York, NY: Catalyst, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Chodorow, The Reproduction of Mothering (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Doorbar, ‘What women want: Addressing the gender imbalance on MBA programmes’ (Australia: Australian International Education Conference, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Ely and D.E. Meyerson, ‘Moving from gender to diversity in organizational diagnosis and intervention’, Diversity Factor, 7(3) (1999) 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Opportunities Commission, Sex and Power: Who Runs Britain? 2007 (London: EOC, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Gilligan, In a Different Voice (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Gray, ‘Women-only management training: A past and present’, in M. Tanton (ed.), Women in Management: A Developing Presence (London: Routledge, 1994) pp. 202–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.T. Hall and J.E. Moss, ‘The new protean career contract: Helping organizations and employees adapt’, Organizational Dynamics, 26(3) (1998) 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.A. Hewlett, Off-Ramps and On-Ramps: Keeping Talented Women on the Road to Success (Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • E.K. Kelan and R. Dunkley Jones, ‘Gender and the MBA’, Working Paper 1 (The Lehman Brothers Centre for Women in Business, London Business School, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • L.A. Mainiero and S.E. Sullivan, ‘Kaleidoscope careers: An alternate explanation for the opt-out revolution’, The Academy of Management Executive, 19(1) (2005) 106–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Reitman and J.A. Schneer, ‘The long-term negative impacts of managerial career interruptions: A longitudinal study of men and women MBAs’, Group & Organization Management, 30(3) (2005) 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Rosenbaum, ‘Organization career systems and employee misperceptions’, in M.B. Arthur, D.T. Hall and B.S. Lawrence (eds), Handbook of Career Theory (USA: Cambridge University Press, 1989) 329–353.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • M.N. Ruderman and P.J. Ohlott, ‘What women leaders want’, Leader to Leader, 31 (2004) 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V.E. Schein and M.J. Davidson, ‘Think manager, think male’, Management Development Review, 6(3) (1993) 24–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Sealy, V. Singh and S. Vinnicombe, The Female FTSE Report 2007: A Year of Encouraging Progress (Cranfield, UK: Cranfield University, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Sinclair, ‘Sex and the MBA’, Organization, 2(2) (1995) 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Sinclair, ‘The MBA through women’s eyes’, Management Learning, 28(3) (1997) 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Smith, ‘Gender issues in management education: A new teaching resource’, Women in Management Review, 12(3) (1997) 100–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.M. Steele and J. Aronson, ‘Contending with a stereotype: African American intellectual test performance and stereotype vulnerability’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (1994) 797–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Sturges, ‘What it means to succeed: Personal conceptions of career success held by male and female managers at different ages’, British Journal of Management, 10 (1999) 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Tanton, ‘Developing authenticity in management development programmes’, Women in Management Review, 7(4) (1992) 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.M. Valerio, ‘An action plan for developing women leaders’, Leadership in Action, 26(5) (2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Deirdre Anderson, Susan Vinnicombe and Val Singh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, D., Vinnicombe, S., Singh, V. (2008). Women Only Leadership Development: A Conundrum. In: James, K.T., Collins, J. (eds) Leadership Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584075_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics