Skip to main content

Are Theories of Subculture Too Class Oriented?

  • Chapter
The Graffiti Subculture

Abstract

Two main academic schools have addressed the ‘subculture’ as an analytic issue; the Functionalist ‘anomie’ or ‘strain’ theorists and, later, Marxist scholars at the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (CCCS) in Birmingham, UK. These theorists assume very distinct analytic positions, as we will see. But they do converge at two main points — both focus on urban, male, working-class adolescents and both share a common concern with the influence of class. They may approach this factor from different directions, but in both cases it is given central consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 Nancy Macdonald

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Macdonald, N. (2001). Are Theories of Subculture Too Class Oriented?. In: The Graffiti Subculture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511743_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics