Skip to main content

The Sectoral Factor

  • Chapter
Corruption

Abstract

Bribery has a demand and supply nexus, much as any other part of the economy. There is a reasonable consensus about the identities of those who demand bribes; they are most often public officials and politicians in powerful positions (especially but not exclusively in emerging markets) who have contracts to allocate or favors to grant. There is less agreement about who is prepared to pay a bribe and why. The supply side is now facing further scrutiny from the doyen of the industry, Transparency International. Its Bribe Payers Index (BPI) consistently indicates that public works contracts, construction, arms and defense are particularly high risk sectors,1 while other research singles out the extractive industries as most associated with both supply and demand for bribery.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. E. C. Moore Jr., “Causes of demand for international bribery,” Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2007, p. 19 <ejbo.jyu.fi>; Global Witness, “Country for sale: welcome to Cambodia: how Cambodia’s elite has captured the country’s extractive industries,” report, 2009 <www.globalwitness.org>.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sachi Suzuki, “Reduced risk, enhanced reputation? An analysis of corporate responses to bribery,” EIRIS, 2010, <www.eiris.org>.

  3. Jennifer Hunt, “Bribery in health care in Uganda,” Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 29, No. 5, June 2010, pp. 699–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharon Fonn, Anne Mtonga, Hope Nkoloma, Grace Bantebya-Kyomuhendo, Leopoldina da Silva, Esther Kazilimani, Sara Davis, and Ramata Dia, “Health providers’ opinions on provider-client relations: results of a multi-country study to test ‘Health Workers for Change’,” Health Policy and Planning, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2001, pp. 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. UK Department of Justice, UK Foreign Bribery Strategy, Cm 7791, London: Department of Justice, January 2010 <www.justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/uk-foreign-bribery-strategy.pdf>.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Hatchard, “Combating transnational corporate corruption: some further lessons from Lesotho,” Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education, Vol. 7, No. 2, October 2009, pp. 155–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Nick Kochan and Robin Goodyear

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kochan, N., Goodyear, R. (2011). The Sectoral Factor. In: Corruption. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343344_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics