Abstract
This book has shown how the patterns of agrarian dynamism and stagnation in colonial Bengal can only be understood by placing them in a long-term ecological perspective. Until recently, much of the historical scholarship on modern Bengal has dealt with a shorter time-frame, focusing either on the ‘transition period’ to colonialism or on the late colonial period leading up to decolonization. In pursuing a long-term historical perspective, this book has argued that the region’s ecology made East Bengal a prosperous and dynamic part of South Asia’s economy until far later than most historians imagine. This was a frontier region, drawing in capital, labour and intense imperial interest until at least the 1890s. Rural poverty in the area that is now Bangladesh emerged only in the twentieth century. As this book has argued, such downward shifts in agrarian economy and well-being stemmed from changes developing from the complex relationship between state, society and the region’s highly fluid ecological regime.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For the pioneering account of the ‘world system’, see Emmanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World-System (New York, 1974).
John L. Christian, ‘Anglo-French Rivalry in Southeast Asia: its Historical Geography and Diplomatic Climate’, Geographical Review, 31(2) (1941): 278.
Arthur Cotton, ‘On Communication Between India and China by the Line of the Burhampooter, June 24, 1867’, Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society of London, 11(6) (1866–67): 257.
John Ogilvy Hay, ‘A Map Shewing the Various Routes and Yang-tse Connecting China with India and Europe Through Burmah and Developing the Trade of Eastern Bengal, Burmah & China’ (London: Edward Stanford, 1875).
G.N. Gupta, A Survey of the Industries and Resources of Eastern Bengal and Assam for 1907–1908 (Shillong, 1908), p. 102.
Ibid., p. 105.
This was as much a global process. Note Michael Williams’s observations: ‘the 1880s was a period of particular introspection. For Europe the space for colonization had all but gone, and the glitter and brilliance of “la belleepoch” seemed too brittle to last. For the US a similar sense of limited space accompanied Frederick Jackson Turner’s announcement that the frontier had “closed” and the Gilded Age was over. The phrase fin de siècle was coined; more than a reference to the last decade, it resonated: decade, decayed, decadence.’ Michael Williams, Deforesting the Earth: From Prehistory to Global Crisis, An Abridgement (Chicago, 2006), p. 359.
See ‘Preface’ to David Ludden (ed.), Agricultural Production, South Asian History, and Development Studies (New Delhi, 2005).
For the debates, see Joya Chatterji, Bengal Divided: Hindu Communalism and Partition, 1932–1947 (Cambridge, 1994), and P. Chatterjee, ‘On Religious and Linguistic Nationalisms: the Second Partition of Bengal’, in Peter van der Veer and Hartmut Lehmann (eds), Nation and Religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia (Princeton, 1999), pp. 116–26.
For details of the ‘surgical’ fashion in which East Bengal’s map was drawn during partition see, Joya Chatterji, ‘The Fashioning of a Frontier: the Radcliffe Line and Bengal’s Border Landscape 1947–52’, Modern Asian Studies, 33(1) (1999): 185–242.
David Arnold, Science, Technology and Medicine in Colonial India (Cambridge, 2000), p. 209.
For a recent collection of important essays that examine aspects of the relationship between nationalism and ecology in South Asia, see Gunnel Cederlöf and K. Sivaramakrishnan (eds), Ecological Nationalisms: Nature, Livelihoods, and Identities in South Asia (Seattle, 2006).
Srischandra Nandy, ‘Preface’, Bengal Rivers and our Economic Welfare (Calcutta, 1948), pp. 59–63.
For an overview of the project and its implications, see Yoginder K. Alagh et al. (eds), Interlinking of Rivers in India: Overview and Ken-Betwa link (New Delhi, 2006). For concern about sustainability and the colossal ecological impact of the project see S.R. Singh and M.P. Srivastava (eds), River Interlinking in India: the Dream and Reality (New Delhi, 2006); S.M. Sengupta, ‘Interlinking of Rivers May Cause Geomorphic Changes’, Journal of Geological Society of India, 69(5) (2007): 11–34; A.K. Saxena Misra, A. Yaduvanshi, M. Mishra et al., ‘Proposed River-Linking Project in India: Boon or Bane to Nature?’, Environmental Geology, 51(8) (2007): 1361–76; A.R.M. Khalid, ‘The Interlinking of Rivers Project in India and International Water Law: an Overview’, Chinese Journal of International Law, 3(2) (2004); Medha Patkar (ed.), A Millennium Folly? (National Alliance for People’s Movement and Initiatives, 2004), pp. 553–70; J. Bandyopadhyay and S. Perveen, ‘Interlinking of Rivers in India: Assessing the Justifications’, Economic and Political Weekly, 39(50) (2004): 5307–16; J. Bandyopadhyay and S. Perveen, ‘Doubts over the Scientific Validity of the Justifications for the Proposed Interlinking of Rivers in India’, Science and Culture, 70(1–2) (2004): 7–20.
Cederlöf and Sivaramakrishnan, Ecological Nationalisms and Rohan D’Souza, Drowned and Dammed: Colonial Capitalism, and Flood Control in Eastern India (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 20–45, 223–4. For a note on the recent assertion of ecological nationalism on the part of China, India and Bangladesh in terms of the eastern Himalayas water systems, see Iftekhar Iqbal, ‘Making Sense of Water’, Forum, 2(5) (June, 2007).
For the debates see Richard Palmer-Jones, ‘Slowdown in Agricultural Growth in Bangladesh: Neither a Good Description Nor a Description Good to Give’, pp. 92–136 and Shapan Adnan, ‘Agrarian Structure and Agricultural Growth Trends in Bangladesh: the Political Economy of Technological Change and Policy Interventions’, pp. 177–228, in Ben Rogaly, Barbara Harriss-White and Sugata Bose (eds), Sonar Bangla? Agricultural Growth and Agrarian Change in West Bengal and Bangladesh (New Delhi, 1999).
An important narrative of modernist displacements of the water regime in colonial and postcolonial Bangladesh is Ahmed Kamal, ‘Living with Water. Bangladesh since Ancient Times’, in T. Tvedt and E. Jakobsson (eds), A History of Water, vol. 3 (London, 2006), pp. 200–10.
Nusha Yamina Choudhury, Alak Paul and Bimal Kanti Paul, ‘Impact of Coastal Embankment on the Flash Flood in Bangladesh’, Applied Geography, 24(3) (July 2004): 241–58.
Shapan Adnan, ‘Intellectual Critiques, People’s Resistance, and Inter-Riparian Contestations: Constraints to the Power of the State Regarding Flood Control and Water Management in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Delta of Bangladesh’, in Devleena Ghosh, Heather Goodall and Stephanie Hemelryk Donald (eds), Water, Sovereignty, and Borders in Asia and Oceania (London, 2009), pp. 110–17.
The Lancet, 359(9312), 30 March 2002: 1127.
Abul Barkat, Shafique uz Zaman and Selim Raihan (eds), Political Economy of Khas Land in Bangladesh (Dhaka, 2001), p. 86. A more recent report put this figure at 5 million acres of khas land (8.7 per cent of total land), Towheed Feroze, ‘Land Policy: Pro-Poor Plan is the Key’, Dhaka Courier, 6–12 June, 24(46) (2008): 16–17.
For a recent example of illegal encroachment on char lands, see Daily Star, 20 April 2008; for a narrative of using state mechanism for appropriating the khas mahals in Chittagong Hill Tracts and char lands, see Shapan Adnan, Bangladesher Krishi Prashno: Bhumi Sanskar O Khas Jamir Odhikar Protishthai Gonoandoloner Bhumika [The Agricultural Question in Bangladesh: the Role of Mass Movement in Land Reforms and the Establishment of Rights on Khas Lands] (Dhaka, 2008).
Peter Bertocci, ‘Structural Fragmentation and Peasant Classes in Bangladesh’, Journal of Social Studies, 5 (1979); for evidence of the centripetal mobility of peasant society in the 1970s, see Shapan Adnan and H. Zillur Rahman, ‘Peasant Classes and Land Mobility: Structural Reproduction and Change in Rural Bangladesh’, Bangladesh Historical Studies, 3 (1978); Abu Abdullah, Mosharaff Hossain and Richard Nations, ‘Agrarian Structure and the IRDP — Preliminary Considerations’, Bangladesh Development Studies, 4(2) (1976); Rogaly et al., ‘Introduction’, Sonar Bangla? p.18;also Adnan, ‘Agrarian Structure and Agricultural Growth Trends’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Iftekhar Iqbal
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Iqbal, I. (2010). Reflections. In: The Bengal Delta. Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289819_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289819_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31221-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28981-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)