Abstract
The certainty of Logic, not unlike that of Mathematic and God, has classically been protected by a triply reinforced iron cage of certainty, authority, and tradition. This iron cage has made Logic appear invulnerable to social criticism, skepticism, analysis, reading, and deconstruction. But that iron cage is and always has been an illusion. So what do we find when we ignore the “do not enter” signs, what do we learn about what logic is and where it comes from? In this chapter, I have the modest goal of exploring what we sociologists might be able to say about logic. I draw heavily on what we have already said about mathematics, pure mathematics, and about logic. I treat the sociology of logic as an extension of the sociology of pure mathematics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
General Bibliography
Boole, George, The Laws of Thought (New York: Dover, 1958; orig. publ. 1854).
Clark, Gordon H., “God and Logic,” The Trinity Review, November/December, 1980: 1–7.
Kleene, S.C., Introduction to Metamathematics (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1950).
Lotze, Hermann, Logic, in Three Books, of Thought, of Investigations, and of Knowledge, 2nd ed. in two vols. (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1888).
Nye, Andrea, Words of Power: A Feminist Reading of the History of Logic (New York: Routledge, 1990).
Rosental, Claude, Weaving Self Evidence (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Restivo, S. (2017). What Can a Sociologist Say about Logic?. In: Sociology, Science, and the End of Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95160-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95160-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95159-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95160-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)