Skip to main content

Euroscepticism in the European Parliament

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Opposing Europe in the European Parliament

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

Abstract

The development of anti-EU sentiment is one of the most important features of the integration process over the last two decades. The ongoing economic, political and migration crisis has provided fertile ground for the galvanization of oppositions to the EU. Euroscepticism has progressively become embedded at the national and supranational levels and is now part of the mainstream. This chapter aims at understanding Euroscepticism at the European level. The first section places Euroscepticism within a broader historical context through an up-to-date review of the literature. The next section reviews the main conceptualizations and their shortcomings before explaining how Euroscepticism is defined in the framework of this book. It is argued that Euroscepticism should be seen as an anti-system opposition. The final section empirically examines who the Eurosceptic MEPs are between 2004 and 2016.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbarno, A., & Zapryanova, G. (2013). Indirect effects of Eurosceptic messages on citizen attitudes toward domestic politics. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(4), 581–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, G. (2015). He’s worse than me: The Eurosceptic parties at the turning point. Partecipazione e conflitto, 8(1), 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, Stefano, et al. (2012). Europeanisation and party politics: How the EU affects domestic actors, patterns and systems. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batory, A., & Sitter, N. (2008). Protectionism, populism, or participation? Agrarian parties and the European questions in Western and East Central Europe. In P. Taggart & A. Szczerbiak (Eds.), Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism (Vol. 2, pp. 52–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetto, G. (2008). Explaining the failure of Euroscepticism in the European parliament. In P. Taggart & A. Szczerbiak (Eds.), Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism (pp. 127–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S. (1979). Politics and antipolitics in Western Europe in the seventies. Daedalus, 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouillaud, C. (2008). S’opposer à la constitution européenne dans l’enceinte du PE comme indicateur robuste d’euroscepticisme (2005–2007). In L. Neumayer, A. Roger, & F. Zalewski (Eds.), L’Europe contestée. Espaces et enjeux des positionnements contre lintégration européenne. Michel Houdiard Éditeur (pp. 159–184). Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brack, N., & Startin, N. (2015). Euroscepticism: From the margins to the mainstream. International Political Science Review, 36(3), 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brack, N., & Costa, O. (2012). Euroscepticism within EU institutions: Diverging views of Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brack, N., & Weinblum, S. (2011). Political Opposition: Towards a Renewed Research Agenda. Interdisciplinary Political Studies, 1(1), 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, N. (2016). The Italian political elites and Europe: Big move, small change?, International Political Science Review, online first.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, O. (2001). Le Parlement européen, assemblée délibérante, Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, O., Roger, A., & Saurruger, S. (2008). Les remises en cause de l’intégration européenne. Introduction. Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée, 15(4), 533–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespy, A., & Verschueren, N. (2009). From Euroscepticism to resistance to European Integration: An interdisciplinary perspective. Perspective on European Politics and Society, 10(3), 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchies: Participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1999). Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic’s view, Democracy’s edges, 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmotte, F. (2007). Les résistances à l'Europe au prisme de la sociologie historique de Norbert Elias. In J. Lacroix & R. Coman (Eds.), Les résistances à l’Europe. Cultures nationales, idéologies et stratégies d’acteurs (pp. 17–29), Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sio, L., Emanuele, V., & Maggini, N. (2014). The European Parliament Elections of 2014, CISE.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, C., & Edwards, E. (2009). Taking Europe to its extremes. Party Politics, 15(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, P. (2010). Under what conditions does Euroscepticism flourish? An evaluation of different approaches and empirical findings. Olso: Trial Lecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, P., & Trenz, H. J. (2012). Denouncing European integration: Euroscepticism as polity contestation. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(4), 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Down, I., & Wilson, C. (2008). From ‘permissive consensus’ to ‘constraining dissensus’: A polarizing union? Acta Politica, 43(1), 26–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dye, D. T. (2015). Interpreting Euroskepticism(s): The Anti-establishment parties of the 2014 Euro-elections and their challenges to Integration. Paper presented at the EUSA Biennial Conference, Boston, 5–7 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanuele, V., Maggini, N., & Marino, B. (2016). Gaining votes in Europe against Europe? How national contexts shaped the results of Eurosceptic Parties in the 2014 European parliament elections. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 12(3), 697–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, C. (2009). Dimensions of Euroscepticism. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(4), 911–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M., Marsh, M., & McLarren, L. (1994). Uncorking the bottle: Popular opposition to European unification in the wake of Maastricht. Journal of Common Market Studies, 32(4), 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacone, A., & Olivi, B. (2007). L’Europe Difficile. Paris, Gallimard: Histoire Politique de la Construction Européenne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, C. (2008). The making of Eurosceptic Britain: Identity and economics in a post-imperial state. Londres: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen, R. (2005). L’Europe et les partis politiques nationaux: les leçons d’un non-clivage. Revue internationale de politique comparée, 12(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen, R. (2010). Concluding comment: On understanding the relationship between populism and Euroscepticism. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 11(3), 333–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen, R., & Spiering, M. (2004). Euroscepticism: Party politics, national identity and European integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartleb, F. (2011). After their establishment: Right-wing populist parties in Europe. European View, 10(2), 267–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms, L. (2008). Studying parliamentary opposition in old and new democracies: Issues and perspectives. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 14(1), 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S., Noury, A., & Roland, G. (2007). Democratic politics in the European parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. (2015). The 2014 European elections: Divided in unity? Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(S1), 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (1997). The making of a polity: The struggle over European integration. European Integration Online Papers, 1/004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2007). Sources of Euroscepticism. Acta Politica, 42(2–3), 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A Post-functionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ionescu, G., & De Madariaga, I. (1968). Opposition: Past and Present of a Political Institution, Londres: The New Thinker Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, C., & Spoon, J.-J. (2010). Thinking locally, acting supranationally: Niche party behavior in the European Parliament. European Journal of Political Research, 4(2), 174–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. (2008). Euroscepticism in parliament: A comparative analysis of the European parliament and National parliaments In P. Taggart & A. Szczerbiak, Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism: Volume 2, 151–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kircheimer, O. (1964). Politik und Verfassung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kný, D., & Kratochvíl, P. (2015). Caught in the deviation trap. On the fallacies of the study of party-based Euroscepticism. Czech Journal of Political Science, 3, 200–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopecky, P., & Mudde, C. (2002). The Two Sides of Euroscepticism. Party positions on European integration in East Central Europe. European Union Politics, 3(3), 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krouwel, A., & Abts, K. (2007). The structure of political discontent: A typology of eurorejectionism. Acta Politica, 42(2/3), 252–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leconte, C. (2010). Understanding Euroscepticism. Palgrave MacMillan: Basingstoke.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lees, C. (2002). ‘Dark Matter’: Institutional constraints and the failure of party-based euroscepticism in Germany (OERN Working Paper. 8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L., & Scheingold, S. (1970). Europe’s would-be polity: Patterns of change in the european community. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnette, P., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2008). On the politicization of the European consociation: A middle-way between Hix and Bartolini (p. C0801). Eurogov: European governance papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2000). Past in the Present: A cleavage theory of party response to European integration. British Journal of Political Science, 30(3), 433–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., Wilson, C. J., & Ray, L. (2002). National political parties and European integration. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 585–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, G., & Benoit, K. (2010). Party policy and group affiliation in the European parliament. British Journal of Political Science, 40(2), 377–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mény, Y. (2009). La construction d’un parlement: 50 ans d’histoire du Parlement européen. 1958–2008, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mény, Y. (2012). Conclusion: A Voyage to the Unknown. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(S1), 154–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (2005). The idea of a European superstate. Public justification and European integration, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2011). Sussex v. North Carolina. The comparative study of party-based Euroscepticism. SEI Working paper, 121:1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhold, C., & Settembri, P. (2009). Achieving consensus through committees: Does the European parliament manage? Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(1), 127–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, L. (2008). Euroscepticism as a political label: The use of European Union issues in political competition in the new member states. European Journal of Political Research, 47(2), 135–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neunreither, K. (1998). Governance without opposition: The case of the European Union. Government and Opposition, 33(4), 435–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nivet, B. (2016). Union européenne: une dépolitisation propice au populisme. La revue internationale et stratégique, 84, 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otjes, S., & van Der Veer, H. (2016). The Eurozone crisis and the European parliament’s changing lines of conflict. European Union Politics, 17(2), 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proksch, S.-O., & Lo, J. (2012). Reflections on the European integration dimension. European Union Politics, 13(2), 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raunio, T. (2007). Softening but persistent: Euroscepticism in the Nordic countries. Acta Politica, 42(2/3), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roger, A. (2007). Les résistances partisanes à l’intégration européenne. Un objet de comparaison à consolider. In Lacroix, J., & Coman, R., Les résistances à l’Europe. Cultures régionales, idéologies et stratégies d’acteurs, (pp. 31–48). Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, G. (2011). The European Union and its crisis. Through the eyes of the Brussels’ Elite. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1966). Opposition and control problems and prospects. Government and Opposition, 1(1), 149–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schapiro, L. (1965). Foreword. Government and Opposition, 1(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scully, R. (1998). MEPs and the Building of a ‘Parliamentary Europe’. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4(3), 92–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scully, R. M. (2005). Becoming Europeans. Attitudes, behaviour, and socialization in the European parliament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serricchio, F., Tsakatika, M., & Quaglia, L. (2013). Euroscepticism and the global financial crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitter, N. (2001). The politics of opposition and European integration in Scandinavia: Is Euroscepticism a government-opposition dynamic? West European Politics, 24(4), 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenbergen, M., Edwards, E., & De Vries, C. (2007). Who’s cueing whom? Mass-elite linkages and the future of European integration. European Union Politics, 8(1), 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szczerbiak, A., & Taggart, P. (2000). Opposing Europe: Party systems and opposition to the union, the Euro and Europeanisation. OERN working paper, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szczerbiak, A., & Taggart, P. (2002). The party politics of euroscepticism in EU member and candidate states, SEI working paper, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P. (1998). A touchstone of dissent: Euroscepticism in contemporary Western political systems. European Journal of Political Research, 33(3), 363–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenz, H-J., & De Wilde, P. (2009). Denouncing European integration, Euroscepticism as reactive identity formation. Arena Working Paper, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usherwood, S. (2005a). Opposition to the European Union in the UK: The dilemma of public opinion and party management. Government and Opposition, 37(2), 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usherwood, S. (2005b). Realists, sceptics and opponents: Opposition to the EU’s Constitutionnal Treaty. Journal of Common European Research, 1(2), 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usherwood, S. (2007a). Sceptical or simply opposed? Anti-EU groups and the constitution In A. Cohen & A. Vauchez (eds.), La Constitution européenne: élites, mobilisations et votes, 167–180. Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usherwood, S. (2007b). Proximate factors in the mobilization of Anti-EU groups in France and the UK: The European Union as first order politics. Journal of European Integration, 29(1), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usherwood, S., & Startin, N. (2013). Euroscepticism as a Persistent Phenomenon. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usherwood, S. (2014), The Eurosceptic paradox, EPERN, available at https://epern.wordpress.com/2014/06/09/the-eurosceptic-paradox/.

  • Van Ingelgom, V. (2014). Integrating indifference: A comparative, qualitative and quantitative approach to the legitimacy of European integration. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasilopoulou, S. (2013). Continuity and change in the study of euroscepticism: Plus ça change? Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1), 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verney, S. (2011). Euroscepticism in Southern Europe: A diachronic perspective. South European Society and Politics, 16(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verney, S. (2015). Waking the ‘sleeping giant’or expressing domestic dissent? Mainstreaming Euroscepticism in crisis-stricken Greece. International Political Science Review, 36(3), 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voeten, E., & Rosenthal, H. (2004). Analyzing roll calls with perfect spatial voting: France 1946–1958. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 620–632.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathalie Brack .

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brack, N. (2018). Euroscepticism in the European Parliament. In: Opposing Europe in the European Parliament. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60201-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics