Abstract
This paper elucidates that the Thai-Dutch couples uphold disparate ideas of family responsibilities such as inter-generational relations, family structure as well as relations between siblings. As a result of such differences, material contributions made by Thai wives to their natal kin are liable to cause their Dutch husband feelings of unease. It also examines how the Thai-Dutch couples adapt to, reflect on and negotiate different obligations to each other’s natal and conjugal families, leading to transformation of family relations. This paper suggests that to understand whether marriage migration will result in financial gain for the women’s natal family or not, family norms and gender issues have to be taken into account.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Two of the 45 Thai women had been in relationships with Dutch men before marrying their current partners. One of the women eventually married a Surinamese who had lived in the Netherlands for 30 years and was a naturalised Dutch citizen. The other woman started a relationship with a Norwegian man who had lived in the Netherlands for 7 years.
- 2.
This paper focuses on the second wave of Thai migration, from the late 1970s to the present.
- 3.
- 4.
These numbers include both the first and the second generation. According to the CBS (2015), the first generation refers to persons born abroad with at least one parent born abroad. The second generation encompasses persons born in the Netherlands with at least one parent born abroad. These statistics exclude Thais who have either become Dutch citizens and those who live illegally in the Netherlands.
- 5.
The parents’ low expectation of care from their son has also been influenced by the idea of gender and marriage practice in Thai society. The traditional practices in rural areas, especially in the north and the northeast, include the presumption that men sometimes would leave their parental home and travel to another village or city for months. While they were away from home, their financial support to the parents might be lessened or even discontinued. Moreover, the traditional practice of matrilocal residence, in which the man tended to move in with his wife’s family and contributed to his in-laws’ household, lessened his own parents’ expectations of material help from him. Even though the practice of matrilocal residence has declined and the rural–urban migration of both men and women is now very pronounced, the idea of a son who flees the nest and can less readily be approached for family tasks, compared with daughters, has persisted (Mills 1999; Whittaker 1999).
- 6.
The Dutch pension system consists of three pillars: (1) the universal old-age state pension (AOW), (2) the work-related pension and (3) the private commercial pension provision. The basic state pension (first pillar) is provided to all Dutch citizens at the age of 65 in the form of a flat-rate pension benefit which in principle guarantees 70 percent of the net minimum wage. Although there is no obligation for employers to make pension commitments to their employees, over 90 percent of those employed in the Netherlands participate in an occupational pension scheme. If the collective labour agreement lasts for 35–40 years, the total pension benefit will be around 70 percent of the final salary, including the first pillar benefit. The third pillar of the Dutch pension system consists of the individual pension provisions. These are obtained from insurance companies offering schemes for individual pension provisions. They can be obtained through annuity or endowment insurance (SZW 2010).
References
Bryceson, D., & Vuorela, U. (2002). Transnational families in the twenty-first century. In D. Bryceson & U. Vuorela (Eds.), Transnational families, new European frontiers and global networks (pp. 3–30). Berg: Oxford.
Carling, J. (2014). Scripting remittances: Making sense of money transfer in transnational relationships. International Migration Review, 48(s1), S218–S262.
Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2003). The age of migration (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
CBS (2015). Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. http://www.cbs.nl. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.
Erdal, M. B. (2012). Who is the money for? Remittances within and beyond the household in Pakistan. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 21(4), 437–457.
Ganesh, K. (2005). Made to measure. Dutch elder care at the intersections of policy and culture. In K. Ganesh, R. Palriwala, & C. Risseeuw (Eds.), Care culture and citizenship. Revisiting the politics of the Dutch welfare state (pp. 116–158). Amsterdam: Spinhuis Publishers.
Goody, J. (2000). The European family: An historico-anthropological essay. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (1994). Gendered transition. Mexican experiences of immigration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Keely, C. B., & Tran, B. N. (1989). Remittances from labor migration. Evaluations, performance and implication. International Migration Review, 23(3), 500–525.
Kim, D.-S. (2010). The rise of cross-border marriage and divorce in contemporary Korea. In W.-S. Yang & M. Chia-Wen Lu (Eds.), Asian cross-border marriage migration: Demographic patterns and social issues (pp. 127–156). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
King, R., & Vullnetari, J. (2006). Orphan pensioners and migrating grandparents. The impact of mass migration on older people in rural Albania. Ageing and Society, 26(5), 783–816.
King, R., Dalipaj, M., & Mai, N. (2006). Gendering migration and remittances, evidence from London and Northern Albania. Population, Space and Place, 12(6), 409–434.
Levitt, P. (2001). The transnational villagers. California: University of California Press.
Lianos, T. P. (1997). Factors determining migrant remittances. The case of Greece. International Migration Review, 31(1), 72–87.
Lipton, M. (1980). Migration from the rural areas of poor countries. The impact of rural productivity and income distribution. World Development, 8(1), 1–24.
Lisborg, A. (2002) ‘Bodies across borders: Prostitution-related migration from Thailand to Denmark’ in S. Thorbek, S. and B. Pattaniak (eds.) Transnational prostitution: Changing global patterns, London: Zed Books, pp. 100-120.
Mills, M. B. (1999). Thai women in the global labor force, consuming desires, contested selves. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Mix, P. R., & Piper, N. (2003). Does marriage “liberate” women from sex work?—Thai women in Germany. In N. Piper & M. Roces (Eds.), Wife or worker? Asian women and migration (pp. 53–72). Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
Orozco, M. (2002). Globalization and migration: The impact of family remittances in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 44(2), 41–66.
Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Servants of globalization: women, migration and domestic work. California: Stanford University Press.
Pongpaichit, P. (1982). From peasant girls to Bangkok masseuses. Geneva: The International Labor Office.
Risseeuw, C. (2005). Changing trajectories of family and friendship in the Netherlands. In K. Ganesh, R. Palriwala, & C. Risseeuw (Eds.), Care culture and citizenship. Revisiting the politics the Dutch welfare state (pp. 70–115). Amsterdam: Spinhuis Publishers.
Ruenkaew, P. (1999, July 4–8). Marriage migration of Thai women to Germany. Paper presented at the 7th international conference on Thai studies, Amsterdam.
Ruenkaew, P. (2002). Female Thai migrants in Japan. Journal of Gender Studies, 5, 47–69.
Salih, R. (2002). Shifting meaning of “home”: Consumption and identity in Moroccan women’s transnational practices between Italy and Morocco. In N. Al-Ali & K. Koser (Eds.), New approaches to migration? Transnational communities and the transformation of home (pp. 51–67). London: Routledge.
Stafford, C. (2000). Chinese patriliny and the cycles of Yang and Laiwang. In J. Carsten (Ed.), Cultures of relatedness: New approaches to the study on kinship (pp. 37–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stone, L. (2006). Kinship and gender. An introduction. Colorado: Westview Press.
Sunanta, S. (2008, January 9–11). Love and marriage in ‘international villages’: Cross-cultural marriages between Thai women and foreign men in Ban Karawek and Ban Sri Udon. Paper presented at the 10th international conference on Thai studies, Bangkok.
SZW (2010). Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid. http://home.szw.nl/index.cfm. Accessed 20 Nov 2010.
Taylor, E. J. (1999). The new economics of labor migration and the role of remittances in the migration process. International Migration, 37(1), 63–86.
ten Brummelhuis, H., & Stengs, I. (2007). Thai-Dutch interactions in the Thai community. In D. na Pombejra, H. ten Brummelhuis, N. Chutiwongs, & P. Charoenwongsa (Eds.), Proceedings of the international symposium crossroads of Thai and Dutch history (pp. 369–398), Leiden 9–11 Sept 2004. Bangkok: SEAMEO-SPAFA.
Tosakul, R. (2010). Cross-border marriages: Experiences of village women from northeastern Thailand with western men. In W.-S. Yang & M. Chia-Wen Lu (Eds.), Asian cross-border marriage migration: Demographic patterns and social issues (pp. 179–200). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Whittaker, A. (1999). Women and capitalist transformation in a northeastern Thai village. In P. A. Jackson & N. M. Cook (Eds.), Genders and sexualities in modern Thailand (pp. 43–62). Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brown, P.S. (2016). Circulating Remittances: Cross-Border Negotiation of Family Values Among Thai Migrant Women and Their Dutch Husbands. In: Nowicka, M., Šerbedžija, V. (eds) Migration and Social Remittances in a Global Europe. Europe in a Global Context. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60126-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60126-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-60125-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-60126-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)