Abstract
In this paper, the authors unpack ‘social remittances’ in the context of religiously motivated transnational Islamic charity, focusing on education and gender equality. They approach social transformation by seeing migration as enmeshed in social change, with both intended and unintended outcomes. Their study adopts a multi-sited approach, tracing circulation between Lahore, London and Oslo as key sites in this transnational social field, drawing on semi-structured interviews, observation and informal interaction with actors engaged in Islamic charity. The authors find that negotiations over the meaning of ideas across transnational social fields in their case foregrounds a transcendental layer, and underscores the need for critical attention to the implications of a ‘diaspora bias’ in analyses of social remittances exchanges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the analysis all names of the organisations and individuals have been changed.
- 2.
This is similar to what Levitt and Merry (2009: 447) describe in their discussion of ‘global value packages’ as a ‘fundamentalist religious package, based on gender complementarity, tradition, conservatism, and authority’.
- 3.
The Organisation for Education does not provide loans for repayment.
- 4.
This is equivalent to approximately 21 EUR.
- 5.
This is equivalent to approximately 21,000 EUR.
References
Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(02), 239–275.
Ammerman, N. T. (2014). Finding religion in everyday life. Sociology of Religion, 75(2), 189–207.
Bakewell, O. (2010). Some reflections on structure and agency in migration theory. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1689–1708.
Bashir, N. (2014). The drivers and impacts of family obligations and overseas remittances practices: A case study of Pakistani-origin individuals in the UK. Social Policy and Society, 13(02), 177–188.
Benthall, J. (2012). Charity. In D. Fassin (Ed.), A companion to moral anthropology (pp. 359–375). Wiley-Blackwell: Malden.
Boccagni, P., & Decimo, F. (2013). Mapping social remittances. Migration Letters, 10(1), 1–10.
Bolognani, M., & Erdal, M. B. (2016). Return imaginaries and political climate: Comparing thinking about return mobilities among Pakistani origin migrants and descendants in Norway and the UK. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 1–15 (Online first). doi:10.1007/s12134-016-0470-4.
Borchgrevink, K. (2013). Transnational links of Afghan Madrasas: Implications for the reform of religious education. Prospect: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 43(1), 69–84.
Carling, J. (2008). The human dynamics of migrant transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(8), 1452–1477.
Carling, J. (2014). Scripting remittances: Making sense of money transfers in transnational relationships. International Migration Review, 48(s1), S218–SS62.
Castles, S. (2010). Understanding global migration: A social transformation perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1565–1586.
de Haas, H. (2010). Migration and development: A theoretical perspective. International Migration Review, 44(1), 227–264.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Erdal, M. B. (2012). Who is the money for? Remittances within and beyond the household in Pakistan. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 21(4), 437–457.
Erdal, M. B. (2014). The social dynamics of remittance-receiving in Pakistan: Agency and opportunity among non-migrants in a transnational social field. In M. M. Rahman, T. Tai Yong, & A. Ullah (Eds.), Migrant remittances in South Asia: Social economic and political implications (pp. 115–134). Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.
Erdal, M.B. and Borchgrevink, K. (2015). Diaspora development engagements seen through the Prism of Islamic Charity. PRIO Policy Brief, 16. Oslo: PRIO.
Erdal, M. B., & Borchgrevink, K. (2016). Transnational Islamic charity as everyday rituals. Global Networks, 16. doi:10.1111/glob.12137.
Falzon, M.-A. (Ed.). (2009). Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary social research. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
Grabowska I., & Engbersen, G. (forthcoming). Social remittances and the impact of temporary migration on an EU sending country: The case of Poland, Central and Eastern European Migration Review. 1–19. doi: 10.17467/ceemr.2016.05
Grünenfelder, J. (2013). Discourses of gender identities and gender roles in Pakistan: Women and non-domestic work in political representations. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 68–77.
IRIN. (2012). Analysis: Faith-based aid revolution in the Muslim world. IRIN News. http://www.irinnews.org/report/95564/analysis-a-faith-based-aid-revolution-in-the-muslim-world. Accessed 29 Feb 2016.
Kochuyt, T. (2009). God, gifts and poor people: On charity in Islam. Social Compass, 56(1), 98–116.
Kuschminder, K. (forthcoming). Reintegration strategies: Conceptualizing how return migrants reintegrate. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Levitt, P. (1998). Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32(4), 926–948.
Levitt, P., & Lamba-Nieves, D. (2011). Social remittances revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(1), 1–22.
Levitt, P., & Lamba-Nieves, D. (2013). Rethinking social remittances and the migration-development nexus from the perspective of time. Migration Letters, 10(1), 11–22.
Levitt, P., & Merry, S. (2009). Vernacularization on the ground: Local uses of global women’s rights in Peru, China, India and the United States. Global Networks, 9(4), 441–461.
Merton, R. K. (1967). Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press.
Pollard, J., Datta, K., James, A. and Akli, Q. (2015) Islamic charitable infrastructure and giving in East London: Everyday economic-development geographies in practice. Journal of Economic Geography. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbv020 (Online first).
Portes, A. (2010). Migration and social change: Some conceptual reflections. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1537–1563.
Raghuram, P. (2009). Which migration, what development? Unsettling the edifice of migration and development. Population Space and Place, 15(2), 103–117.
Rahman, M. M., & Fee, L. K. (2012). Towards a sociology of migrant remittances in Asia: Conceptual and methodological challenges. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 8(4), 689–706.
Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage.
Sinatti, G., & Horst, C. (2015). Migrants as agents of development: Diaspora engagement discourse and practice in Europe. Ethnicities, 15(1), 134–152.
Yeoh, B. S. A., Leng, C. H., Dung, V. T. K., & Yi’en, C. (2013). Between two families: The social meaning of remittances for vietnamese marriage migrants in Singapore. Global Networks, 13(4), 441–458.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Borchgrevink, K., Erdal, M.B. (2016). The Circulation of Transnational Islamic Charity. In: Nowicka, M., Šerbedžija, V. (eds) Migration and Social Remittances in a Global Europe. Europe in a Global Context. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60126-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60126-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-60125-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-60126-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)