Abstract
This chapter describes a successful first-year composition service-learning partnership, the IluminaciĆ³n Writing Program, in which college writing students worked alongside high school students in collaborative writing workshops. Read-Davidson chronicles the evolution of the program, from the epistemological consequences of its naming to its empowering final reading event, demonstrating how the foundational theories of social constructionism and collaborative pedagogy practiced in writing programs and writing centers can be translated to service-learning partnerships in the community. Initial challenges in recruitment, stakeholder investment, and student engagement necessitated a revisiting of theories in writing and service-learning pedagogies, leading to a revision of praxis to create a more reciprocal series of collaborative workshop s that benefited both sets of participants.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartholomae, D. (1986). Inventing the university. Journal of Basic Writing, 5(1), 4ā23.
Billig, S. H. , Jesse, D. , Brodersen, R. M. , & Grimley, M. (2008). Promoting secondary studentsā character development in schools. In M. A. Bowdon , S. H. Billig , & B. A. Holland (Eds.), Scholarship for sustaining service-learning and civic engagement (pp. 57ā84). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Bruffee, K. A. (1986). Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographic essay. College English, 48(8), 773ā790.
Bruffee, K. A. (1993). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
Burke, K. (1973). The philosophy of literary form: Studies in symbolic action. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Busillo Aguayo, J. , & Munsch, J. (2009). Program theory: A framework for collaborative measurement of service-learning outcomes. In T. Kelshaw , F. Lazarus , & J. Minier (Eds.), Partnerships for service-learning: Impacts on communities and students (pp. 267ā284). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Chen, H. (2004). Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Durlak, J. A. , & Weissberg, R. P. (2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.Retrieved from https://www.lions-quest.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/AfterSchoolProgramsStudy2007.pdf
Eddy, P. L. (2010). Partnerships and collaborations in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Fertman, C. I. , White, G. P. , & White, L. J. (2002). Service-learning in the middle school: Building a culture of service. Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.
Furco, A. (2002). Is service-learning really better than community service? A study of high school service program outcomes. In A. Furco & S. H. Billig (Eds.), Service-learning: The essence of the pedagogy (pp. 23ā52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Gere, A. R. (1987). Writing groups: History, theory, and implications. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Harwood, A. M. , & Radoff, S. A. (2009). Reciprocal benefits of mentoring: Results of a middle school-university collaboration. In B. E. Moely , S. H. Billig , & B. A. Holland (Eds.), Creating our identities in service-learning and community engagement (pp. 159ā188). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
Harris, M. (1992). Collaboration is not collaboration is not collaboration: Writing center tutorials vs. peer-response groups. College Composition and Communication, 43(3), 369ā383.
Harris, M. , & Silva, T. (1993). Tutoring ESL students: Issues and options. College Composition and Communication, 44(4), 525ā537.
Herrera, C. , Zoua Vang, Z. , & Gale, L. Y. (2002). Group mentoring: Study of mentoring groups in three programs. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
Lunsford, A. (1991). Collaboration, control, and the idea of a writing center. The Writing Lab Newsletter, 16, 1ā6.
McAndrew, D. A. , & Reigstad, T. J. (2001). Tutoring writing: A practical guide for conferences. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
North, S. M. (1984). The idea of a writing center. College English, 46(5), 433ā446.
Pratt, M. L. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 1991, 33ā40.
Pritchard, F. F. , & Whitehead III, G. I. (2004). Serve and learn: Implementing and evaluating service-learning in middle and high schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Spear, K. (1988). Sharing writing: Peer response groups in English classes. Portsmouth, NH: Boyton/Cook.
Stanton, T. K. , Giles Jr., D. E. , & Cruz, N. I. (1999). Service-learning: A movementās pioneers reflect on its origins, practice, and future. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Postscript from the Editors
Postscript from the Editors
Complex CollaborationāIn describing effective communityāuniversity, or town-and-gown, relationships, Eddy (2010) notes three key ingredients: a college staff member who acts as āa community facilitator, support from higher-level college administrators, and community initiation of the ventureā (p. 11). All three are evident in Read-Davidsonās narrative of the IluminaciĆ³n project. University administration and donors provided support and shared values, and Read-Davidson functioned as the college-based community facilitator, while the students and their families were integral participants in the effort to help ālow-income high school students of [the] local community become better writers, while fostering a sense of civic engagement among Chapmanās university students.ā While the program had its problems, Read-Davidson was able to create a service-learning program that fostered āgenuine collaboration between two communities of students,ā with āeach group grow[ing] as writers as a result of their interaction.ā Indeed, they truly earned the approbation of āowning the night!ā
Practical ImplicationsāRead-Davidson describes the trials and tribulations of leaving the ivory tower to work with local communities of writers. The strength of this chapter lies in the honest reflection upon not only the strengths of the IluminaciĆ³n Writing Program, but also, and more importantly, where the program initially met difficulties. Addressing a range of initial stumbling blocksāincluding cultural, linguistic, and motivational differencesāRead-Davidson through honest storytelling demonstrates ways in which writing programs can design mutually beneficial mentoring collaborations among college and high school students. This 2016 example, founded upon conversational models of tutoring, blog entries, and celebratory end-of-semester events, illustrates the foundational theories of writing center work most often cited in composition scholarship. Finally, to sustain permeable fluidity between higher education and community partners, and to garner necessary resources for long-term success of this program, Read-Davidson acknowledges the importance of developing an assessment plan.
Copyright information
Ā© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Read-Davidson, M. (2017). Illuminating Collaboration: Bringing the Writing Program to the Community. In: Myatt, A., Gaillet, L. (eds) Writing Program and Writing Center Collaborations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59932-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59932-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59931-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59932-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)