Skip to main content

Divided They Tweet? A Comparative Analysis of Twitter Networks of Pro- and Anti-EU Parties

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Euroscepticism, Democracy and the Media

Abstract

Our study analyses interaction networks of Europhile and Eurosceptical parties from four European countries on Twitter in order to assess their connective behaviour on social media and its conditioning factors. We examine to what degree parties’ communication networks transcend national borders stabilising transnational pro- or anti-European cleavages and to what extent the possibilities of cross-ideological exchange and interaction facilitated by social media play out in the Twitter networks of European parties and their camps. Our analyses indicate a strong separation of ideological cleavages and country clusters around parties and actors from the same country but also traces of transnational and cross-ideological interactions between the networks of Europhile and Eurosceptical parties and their strategic functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Ackland, R., and R. Gibson. 2013. Hyperlinks and Networked Communication: A Comparative Study of Political Parties Online. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 16(3): 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamic L.A., and N. Glance. 2005. The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided they Blog. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, 36–43. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastos M.T., C. Puschmann, and R. Travitzki. 2013. Tweeting Across Hashtags: Overlapping Users and the Importance of Language, Topics, and Politics. Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, 164–168. Paris: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burris, V., E. Smith, and A. Strahm. 2000. White Supremacist Networks on the Internet. Sociological Focus 33(2): 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caiani, M., and L. Parenti. 2013. European and American Extreme Right Groups and the Internet. Farnham & Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover M.D., J. Ratkiewicz, M. Francisco, et al. 2011. Political Polarization on Twitter. Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 89–96. Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, P. 2005. The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation. Political Communication 22(2): 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, C.E., and E.E. Edwards. 2009. Taking Europe to Its Extremes: Extremist Parties and Public Euroscepticism. Party Politics 15(1): 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • eMarketer. 2016. Anteil der Nutzer von Twitter an der Bevölkerung in Westeuropa in den Jahren von 2012 bis 2018. Statista—Das Statistik-Portal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmer, M., and M. Bräuer. 2010. Online-Kommunikation politischer Akteure. In Handbuch Online-Kommunikation, ed. W. Schweiger and K. Beck, 311–338. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Emmer, M., and J. Wolling. 2010. Online-Kommunikation und politische Öffentlichkeit. In Handbuch Online-Kommunikation, ed. W. Schweiger and K. Beck, 36–58. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2015. Public Opinion in the European Union. Standard Eurobarometer 83, Spring 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs D., A. Roger, and R. Magni-Berton. 2009. European Cleavage, Euroscepticism and Support of the EU: A Conceptual Discussion. In Euroscepticism. Images of Europe Among Mass Publics and Political Elites, ed. Fuchs D, Magni-Berton R and Roger A, 9–32. Opladen/Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstenfeld, P.B., D.R. Grant, and C.-P. Chiang. 2003. Hate Online: A Content Analysis of Extremist Internet Sites. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 3(1): 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E., J. Gallo, and M. Kane. 2008. Cross-Ideological Discussions Among Conservative and Liberal Bloggers. Public Choice 134(1): 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartleb, F. 2012. Die euroskeptische Parteienfamilie. In Parteienfamilien. Identitätsbestimmend oder nur noch Etikett? ed. U. Jun and B. Höhne, 302–325. Opladen, Berlin and Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelboim, I., S. McCreery, and M. Smith. 2013. Birds of a Feather Tweet Together: Integrating Network and Content Analyses to Examine Cross-Ideology Exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18: 154–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummell, H.J., and W. Sodeur. 2010. Netzwerkanalyse. In Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse, ed. C. Wolf and H. Best, 575–606. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, U. 2012. Die sozialdemokratische Parteienfamilie. In Parteienfamilien. Identitätsbestimmend oder nur noch Etikett? ed. U. Jun and B. Höhne, 69–98. Opladen, Berlin & Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens, P., and A. Jungherr. 2011. Wahlkampf vom Sofa aus: Twitter im Bundestagswahlkampf 2009. In Das Internet im Wahlkampf. Analysen zur Bundestagswahl 2009, ed. E.J. Schweitzer and S. Albrecht, 201–225. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koc-Michalska, K., R. Gibson, and T. Vedel. 2014a. Online Campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political Actors and Citizens in the Aftermath of the Web.2.0 Evolution. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11(2): 220–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koc-Michalska, K., D.G. Lilleker, P. Surowiec, et al. 2014b. Poland’s 2011 Online Election Campaign: New Tools, New Professionalism, New Ways to Win Votes. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11(2): 186–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, A.O. 2015. The EU Parliament on Twitter—Assessing the Permanent Online Practices of Parliamentarians. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12(2): 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilleker, D.G., and N.A. Jackson. 2011. Elections 2.0: Comparing E-Campaigns in France, Germany, Great Britain and the United States. In Das Internet im Wahlkampf. Analysen zur Bundestagswahl 2009, ed. E.J. Schweitzer and S. Albrecht, 96–116. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maireder, A., S. Schlögl, F. Schütz, et al. 2014. The European Political Twittersphere: Network of Top Users Discussing the 2014 European Elections. Wien: Universität Wien, GfK.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J.M. Cook. 2001. Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger C, H.J. vom Hofe, and C. Nuernbergk. 2010. Twitter und Journalismus. Der Einfluss des “Social Web” auf die Nachrichten. Düsseldorf: Landesanstalt für Medien Nordrhein-Westfalen (LfM), LfM-Dokumentation, Band 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkowiak, T., K. Stanoevska-Slabeva, J. Ebermann, et al. 2012. Netzwerk-Journalismus. Zur veränderten Vermittlerrolle von Journalisten am Beispiel einer Case Study zu Twitter und den Unruhen in Iran. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 60(1): 102–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stöss, R. 2013. Der rechte Rand des Parteiensystems. In Handbuch Parteienforschung, ed. O. Niedermayer, 563–618. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöss, R. 2014. Der rechte Rand bei den Europawahlen 2014. Arbeitshefte aus dem Otto-Stammer-Zentrum, Nr. 22. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, Fachbereich Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften, Otto-Stammer-Zentrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P. 1998. A Touchstone of Dissent: Euroscepticism in Contemporary Western European Party Systems. European Journal of Political Research 33(3): 363–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P., and A. Szczerbiak. 2008. Introduction: Opposing Europe? The Politics of Euroscepticism in Europe. In Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism. Vol. 1, Case Studies and Country Surveys, ed. A. Szczerbiak and P. Taggart, 1–15. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergeer, M. 2015. Twitter and Political Campaigning. Sociology Compass 9(9): 745–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittwer S. 2015. Divided they tweet? Eine Twitter-Netzwerkanalyse pro- und antieuropäischer Parteien in Deutschland und Großbritannien, unpublished BA-Thesis: Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heft, A., Wittwer, S., Pfetsch, B. (2017). Divided They Tweet? A Comparative Analysis of Twitter Networks of Pro- and Anti-EU Parties. In: Caiani, M., Guerra, S. (eds) Euroscepticism, Democracy and the Media. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59643-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59643-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59642-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59643-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics