Skip to main content

Decision-Framing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Investments

Abstract

The opening chapter explores the logic and intuition that capital budgeting employs in evaluating energy investments. It examines how these approaches often lead managers to err in committing to sub-optimal investments, when minimising risks takes precedence over adapting in order to profit from uncertainty. To reframe managerial decision-making, we redefine the energy business and link academic works to inform managerial actions under market and technological uncertainties. An overview of the book is presented, showing how the chapters are organised around thematic clusters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amram, M., & Kulatilaka, N. (2009). The invisible green hand: How individual decisions and markets can reduce greenhouse gas emissions. California Management Review, 51(2), 195–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, G. C., & Hatzopoulos, P. D. (2000). The theory-practice gap in capital budgeting: Evidence from United Kingdom. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 27(5–6), 603–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1964). The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk bearing. Review of Economic Studies, 31(2), 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awerbuch, S. (2006). Portfolio based electricity generation planning: Policy implications for renewable and energy security. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11, 693–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Lev, D., & Katz, S. (1976). A portfolio approach to fossil fuel procurement in the electric utility industry. Journal of Finance, 31(3), 933–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, M. C., & Roll, R. (1974). Capital budgeting of risky projects with ‘imperfect’ markets for physical capital. Journal of Finance, 29(2), 601–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botterud, A., & KorpÃ¥s, M. (2007). A stochastic dynamic model for optimal timing of investments in new generation capacity in restructured power systems. Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 29, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chediak, M., & Martin, C. (2015, November 5). Say good bye to solar power subsidies. Bloomberg Businessweek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T., & Tufano, P. (2004, March 1–12). A real-world way to manage real options. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Conversation (2016, March 2). When will rooftop solar be cheaper than the grid?. US News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. C., Ross, S. A., & Rubinstein, M. (1979). Option pricing: A simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3), 229–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K., & Nalebuff, B. (1991). Thinking strategically: The competitive edge in business, politics and everyday life. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driouchi, T., & Bennett, D. (2011). Real options in multinational decision-making: Managerial awareness and risk implications. Journal of World Business, 46, 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driouchi, T., & Bennett, D. J. (2012). Real options in management and organisational strategy: A review of decision-making and performance implications. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(1), 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson, G., & Taymaz, E. (2002). Institutions, entrepreneurship, economic flexibility and growth—Experiments on an evolutionary micro-to-macro model. In U. Cantner (Ed.), Economic evolution, learning and complexity. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Enzensberger, N., Wietschel, M., & Rentz, O. (2002). Policy instruments fostering wind energy projects—A multi perspective evaluation approach. Energy Policy, 30(9), 793–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, S. F. (2011). Prepare for the unexpected: Investment planning in asset intensive industries. London: Economist Intelligence Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M., & Shapiro, E. (1956). Capital equipment analysis: The required rate of profit. Management Science, 3, 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R., & Harvey, H. R. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2–3), 187–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassett, K., & Metcalf, G. (1999). Do consumers discount the future correctly? Energy Policy, 21(6), 710–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helman, C. (2011, September 7). In Iraq oil deal, Tony Hayward and Nat Rothschild are now partners with Sinopec. New York: Forbes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, H. B., & McClain, K. T. (1998). Reducing the impacts of energy price volatility through dynamic portfolio selection. The Energy Journal, 19(3), 107–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W. S. (1865). The coal question: An inquiry concerning the progress of the nation, and the probable exhaustion of coal mines. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A., Kavali, A., & Neuhoff, K. (2008). Take-or-pay contracts for renewable deployment. Energy Policy, 36(7), 2481–2503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittel, C., & Kroemer, H. (1980). Thermal Physics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1991). Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Näsäkkälä, E., & Fleten, S. E. (2005). Flexibility and technology choice in gas-fired power plant investments. Review of Financial Economics, 14, 371–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinches, G. E. (1982). Myopia, capital budgeting and decision-making. Financial Management, 11(3), 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roques, F., Hiroux, C., & Saguan, M. (2010). Optimal wind power deployment in Europe—A portfolio approach. Energy Policy, 38, 3245–3256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roques, F. A., Newberry, D. M., & Nuttal, W. J. (2008). Fuel mix diversification incentives in liberalized electricity markets: A mean-variance portfolio theory approach. Energy Economics, 30(4), 1831–1849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. P. (2011). Good strategy, bad strategy: The difference and why it matters. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F. (2007). Investors and markets: Portfolio choices, asset prices and investment advice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, H. J. T., & Trigeorgis, L. (2004). Strategic investment: Real options and games. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, K. (2016, March 2). ‘High risk gamble’ sours for Genel Chief as reserves disappoint. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenzel, T., & Frenzel, A. (2008). Regulating technological change—The strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets. Energy Policy, 36, 2645–2657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toke, D., Breukers, S., & Wolsink, M. (2008). Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(4), 1129–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L. (1997). Real options. London: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, second printing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoutsos, T. D., & Stamboulis, Y. A. (2005). The sustainable diffusion of renewable energy technologies as an example of an innovation-focused policy. Technovation, 25, 753–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, P. R. (2012). Innovation nirvana or innovation wasteland? Identifying commercialisation strategies for small and medium renewable energy enterprises. Technovation, 32, 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo G. Barcelona .

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barcelona, R.G. (2017). Decision-Framing. In: Energy Investments. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59139-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics