Skip to main content

Reaching and Teaching Marginalized Children

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teacher Distribution in Developing Countries

Abstract

Despite the “worldwide revolution” in educational enrollment during the twentieth century, a clear division continues to separate marginalized children from their peers: the quality of their teachers. Ample evidence from the United States and growing cross-national evidence demonstrate that children who are poor, who come from ethnic or racial minority groups, who have less educated parents, or who live in rural areas have access to less qualified teachers than their more advantaged peers. Given considerable evidence of the importance of teachers for children’s academic success, the teacher quality division between more and less advantaged children may be as influential in determining these children’s futures as access to formal education was one hundred years ago. In this chapter, we introduce our rationale for studying teachers of marginalized children and we describe the objectives, contributions, and organization of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Reseacher, 36(7), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacolod, M. (2007). Who teaches and where they teach: College graduates of the 1990s. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(3), 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. P. (2014). The schooled society: The educational transformation of global culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavot, A., & Resnik, J. (2006). Lessons from the past: A comparative socio-historical analysis of primary and secondary education. In J. E. Cohen, D. E. Bloom, & M. B. Malin (Eds.), Educating all children: A global agenda (pp. 123–229). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavot, A., & Riddle, P. (1988). The expansion of primary education, 1870–1940: Trends and issues. Sociology of Education, 61(3), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. A. (2011). Making schools work: New evidence on accountability reforms. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2270

  • Carnoy, M. (1974). Education as cultural imperialism. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chudgar, A. (2013). Teacher labor force and teacher education in India: An analysis of a recent policy change and its potential implications. In M. Akiba (Ed.), Teacher reforms around the world: Implementations and outcomes (Vol. 19 & pp. 55–76). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. P. (1979). The necessity of comparisons in the study of education: The salience of science and the problem of comparability. Comparative Education Review, 23(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, P. (1977). Education and social differentiation in less developed countries. Comparative Education Review, 21(2/3), 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, A., & Legault, E. (2015). Closing the primary teacher gap in Sub-Saharan Africa: How many teachers are needed, and how much would it cost? Prospects, 45, 391–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D. D., Brewer, D. J., & Anderson, D. J. (1999). A three-way error components analysis of educational productivity. Education Economics, 7(3), 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D. D., Lavery, L., & Theobald, R. (2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 293–307. doi:10.3102/0013189X15592622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2004). How to improve the supply of high-quality teachers. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy 2004 (pp. 7–44). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luschei, T. F. (2012a). In search of good teachers: Patterns of teacher quality in two Mexican states. Comparative Education Review, 56(1), 69–97. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/661508

  • Luschei, T. F., Chudgar, A., & Rew, J. W. (2013). Exploring differences in the distribution of teacher qualifications across Mexico and South Korea: Evidence from the Teaching and Learning International Survey. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–38. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/DefaultFiles/SendFileToPublic.asp?ft=pdf&FilePath=c:\WebSites\www_tcrecord_org_documents\38_16964.pdf&fid=38_16964&aid=2&RID=16964&pf=Content.asp?ContentID=16964

  • Mkumbo, K. A. (2012). Teachers’ commitment to, and experiences of, the teaching profession in Tanzania: Findings of focus group research. International Education Studies, 5(3), 222–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulkeen, A., & Chen, D. (2008). Teachers for rural schools: Experiences in Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Uganda. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing, and retaining effective teachers. Paris, France: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puryear, J. M., Santibañez, L., & Solano, A. (2011). Education in Mexico, a new vision for Mexico: Achieving prosperity for all. Washington, DC: The Centennial Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. L. (1998). Value-added assessment: A method for measuring the effects of the system, school and teacher on the reate of student academic progress. The School Administrator, 55(11), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, M. (1998). Girls’ educational access and attainment. In N. P. Stromquist (Ed.), Women in the Third World: An encyclopedia of contemporary issues (pp. 381–396). New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2010). Reaching the marginalized. Education for all Global Monitoring Report 2010. Paris, France: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2014a). EFA Global Monitoring Report 2013/4. Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all. Paris, France: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2014b). The Muscat Agreement. Paris, France. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002281/228122e.pdf

  • UNESCO. (2015a). EFA Global Monitoring Report 2015. Education For All 2000–2015: Achievements and challenges. Paris, France: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO Institute for Statistics [UIS]. (2015). UIS.Stat. Retrieved from http://data.uis.unesco.org/#

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Luschei, T.F., Chudgar, A. (2017). Reaching and Teaching Marginalized Children. In: Teacher Distribution in Developing Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57926-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57926-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57925-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57926-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics