Skip to main content

Food Safety

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regulatory Delegation in the European Union

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

Abstract

The food safety sector provides a very good illustration of the expertise pattern. It is characterised by a significant amount of implementing competences delegated to the Commission and the creation of expert committees in order to assist the Commission in drafting scientific regulation. With the food scares in the 1990s, the committee system underwent serious questioning and critics. To improve the system and answer the critics, the Commission first reinforced the committee system and, in a second stage, made a radical move by replacing it by an EU agency, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). This evolution is structured in four steps and the chapter ends with an analysis of the findings in light of the conjectures exposed in Chapter 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alemanno, A. (2006). Food safety and the internal market. In C. Ansell & D. Vogel (Eds.), What’s the beef? The contested governance of European food safety. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alemanno, A. (2007). Trade in food: Regulatory and judicial approaches in the EC and the WTO. London: Cameron May Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alemanno, A. (2008). The European Food Safety Authority at five. European Food and Feed Law Review, 1, 2–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buonanno, L. (2006). The creation of the European food safety authority. In C. Ansell & D. Vogel (Eds.), What’s the beef? The contested governance of European food safety. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, G. R. (1999). The BSE crisis and the European parliament. In C. Joerges & E. Vos (Eds.), EU committees: Social regulation, law and politics. Oxford: Hartman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (1962, November 11). Council Directive on the approximation of the rules of the Member States concerning the colouring matters authorised for use in foodstuffs intended for human consumption. Official Journal of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (1968). Council Decision of 15 October 1968 setting up a Standing Veterinary Committee (68/361/EEC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (1969, November 19). Council Decision of 13 November 1969 setting up a Standing Committee for Foodstuffs (69/414/EEC). Official Journal of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (1976). Council Decision of 23 November 1976 establishing a Standing Committee on plant health (76/894/EEC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (1993). Council Directive of 25 February 1993 on assistance to the Commission and cooperation by the Member States in the scientific examination of questions relating to food (93/5/EEC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Court of Justice. (1979). Judgement C-120/78. Rewe-Zentrale AG v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Court of Justice. (1994). Judgement C-212/91. Angelopharm v. Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deboyser, P. (1989). Le droit communitaire relatif aux denrées alimentaires. Bruxelles: Story Scientia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echols, M. A. (1998). Food safety regulation in the European Union and the United States: Different cultures, different laws. Columbia Journal of European Law, 4, 525–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1974). Commission Decision of 16 April 1974 relating to the institution of a Scientific Committee for Food (74/234/EEC).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1975). Commission Decision of 26 June 1975 setting up an Advisory Committee on Foodstuffs (75/420/EEC).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1978). Commission Decision of 21 April 1978 establishing a Scientific Committee for Pesticides (78/436/EEC).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1981). Commission Decision of 30 July 1981 establishing a Scientific Veterinary Committee (81/651/EEC).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1985a). Commission communication. Completing the internal market. COM(85) 310 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1985b). Commission communication. Completion of the internal market: Community legislation on foodstuffs. COM(85) 603 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1987). Commission Decision of 7 January 1987 on the setting-up of an Advisory Veterinary Committee (87/89/EEC).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1995). Commission Decision of 6 July 1995 relating to the institution of a Scientific Committee for Food (95/273/EC).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1996). Commission Decision of 27 March 1996 on emergency measures to protect against bovine spongiform encephalopathy (96/239/EC).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1997a). Commission Decision of 10 June 1997 setting up a Scientific Steering Committee (97/404/EC).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1997b). Commission Decision of 23 July 1997 setting up Scientific Committees in the field of consumer health and food safety (97/579/EC).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1999). Commission White Paper on food safety. COM(1999) 719 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2000a). Commission communication on the precautionary principle. COM(2000) 1 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2000b). Commission White Paper on food safety. COM(1999) 719 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (1997, February 7). Temporary committee of inquiry into BSE. Report on alleged contraventions or maladministration in the implementation of Community law in relation to BSE. A4-0020/97/A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falke, J. (1996). Comitology and other committees: A preliminary empirical assessment. In R. H. Pedler & G. F. Schaefer (Eds.), Shaping European law and policy: The role of committees and comitology in the political process. Maastricht: EIPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallows, S. (1990). The food sector. London: Routledge, University of Bradford and Spicers Centre for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gérard, A. (1987). Le droit de l’alimentation dans l’Europe d’aujourd’hui : Actes du colloque européen de 1984. Bruxelles: Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., & Pope, H. (2004). EU food law and policy. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, P., Kemper, F., & Pascal, G. (1999). A European food and public health authority: The future of scientific advice in the EU. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, C. (2001). Law, science and the management of risks to health at the National, European and International level—Stories on baby dummies, mad cows and hormones in beef. Columbia Journal of European Law, 7, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, C., & Neyer, J. (1997). Transforming strategic interaction into deliberative problem-solving: European comitology in the foodstuffs sector. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), 609–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, D. R. (2002). The politics of ‘Eurocratic’ structure and the new European agencies. West European Politics, 25(4), 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapohl, S. (2007). Thalidomide, BSE and the single market: An historical‐institutionalist approach to regulatory regimes in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 46, 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapohl, S. (2008). Risk regulation in the single market: The governance of pharmaceuticals and foodstuffs in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krapohl, S., & Zurek, K. (2006). The perils of Committee Governance: Intergovernmental bargaining during the BSE scandal in the European Union. European Integration Online Papers, 10(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyer, J. (2000). The regulation of risks and the power of the people: Lessons from the BSE crisis. European Integration Online Papers, 4(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, R. (1998). European food law. Bembridge: Palladian Law Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, R. (2005). European food law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santer, J. (1997, February 18). Speech 97/39. European Parliament. Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • St Clair Bradley, K. (1999). Institutional aspects of comitology: Scenes from the cutting room floor. In C. Joerges & E. Vos (Eds.), EU committees: Social regulation, law and politics. Oxford: Hartman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Testori, P., & Deboyser, P. (2014). The European Food Safety Authority: A view from the European Commission. In A. Alemanno & S. Gabbi (Eds.), Foundations of EU food law and policy: Ten years of the European food safety authority. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2001). The new politics of risk regulation in Europe. London: London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, E. (2000). EU food safety regulation in the aftermath of the BSE crisis. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23, 227–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mathieu, E. (2016). Food Safety. In: Regulatory Delegation in the European Union. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57835-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics