Skip to main content
  • 273 Accesses

Abstract

Irony is an under-acknowledged tone in counterfactual imaginaries of Napoleon, in Richard Whately’s satirical pamphlet, Historic Doubts Relative to Napoleon Buonaparte(1819) , and throughout the century. These included the first full-length work of alternate history, Louis Geoffroy’s Napoléon et la conquête du monde (1836), Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace (1869) , Edmund Lawrence’s minor novel, It May Happen Yet: A Tale of Bonaparte’s Invasion of England(1899) , and G. M. Trevelyan’s historical essay, “If Napoleon Had Won the Battle of Waterloo” (1907). In all these instances, Napoleonic imaginaries were also used to highlight perceived errors in models of historical interpretation, from self-congratulatory Liberalism to the belief that great men make history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Carver .

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carver, B. (2017). Napoleonic Imaginaries. In: Alternate Histories and Nineteenth-Century Literature. Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57334-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics