Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

George Stigler, the First Apostle of the “Coase Theorem”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
George Stigler

Abstract

George Stigler coined the name “the Coase theorem” to refer to the idea proposed by Ronald Coase in “The Problem of Social Cost” (Coase in Journal of Law and Economics 3:1–44, 1960) of a negotiated solution to externalities. But the name contained two errors: it was not a theorem, and it was not Coase’s message, which insisted rather on the role of transaction costs. In microeconomics, the unidentified object named “the Coase theorem”, however, became central. Stigler, initially unconvinced by Coase’s criticism of the Pigovian analysis of externalities (Coase in Journal of Law and Economics 2:1–40, 1959), was converted in one night according to his 1988 autobiography. He stated the “Coase theorem” in the third edition of his Theory of Price, but made it rest only on examples. This chapter examines the meaning of his “Coase theorem”, both from an analytical perspective and as regards its theoretical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K. J. (1969). “The organization of economic activity: Issues pertinent to the choice of market versus non market allocation”, in Joint Economic Committee (ed.), The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPB System, vol. 1, Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 47–64. Repr. in Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, vol. 2: General Equilibrium, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1983, 133–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1979). “The property rights doctrine and demand revelation under incomplete information”, in M. J. Boskin (ed.), Economics and Human Welfare: Essays in Honour of Tibor Scitovski, New York, Academic Press, 23–39.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berta, N., and Bertrand, E. (2014). “Market internalization of externalities: What is failing?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 36(3), 331–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, E. (2010). “The three roles of the ‘Coase theorem’ in Coase’s works”, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17(4), 975–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, E. (2015a). “An underrated originality of ‘The Problem of Social Cost’: The LSE source”, History of Economic Ideas, 23(3), 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, E. (2015b). “From the firm to economic policy: The problem of Coase’s cost”, History of Political Economy, 47(3), 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, E. (2019). “Much ado about nothing? The controversy over the validity of the Coase theorem”, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26(3), 502–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and Stubblebine, W. C. (1962). “Externality”, Economica, 29(116), 371–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi, G. (1965). “The decision for accidents: An approach to nonfault allocation of costs”, Harvard Law Review, 78(4), 713–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi, G. (1968). “Transaction costs, resource allocation and liability rules—A comment”, Journal of Law and Economics, 11(1), 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1959). “The federal communications commission”, Journal of Law and Economics, 2(Oct.), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960). “The problem of social cost”, Journal of Law and Economics, 3(Oct.), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1981). “The Coase theorem and the empty core: A comment”, Journal of Law and Economics, 24(1), 183–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1982). “How should economists choose?” G. Warren Nutter Lecture in Political Economy, Washington, DC, The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1988). The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1992). “The institutional structure of production”, The American Economic Review, 82(4), 713–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1993). “Law and economics at Chicago”, Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1), 239–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1996). “Law and economics and A. W. Brian Simpson”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 25(1), 103–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1997). “Looking for results”, an interview with T. W. Hazlett, Reason, January, 40–46. http://www.reason.com/news/show/30115.html.

  • Coase, R. H. (2012). “Coase on externalities, the firm, and the state of economics”, interview with R. Roberts for econtalk, May 8. http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2012/05/coase_on_extern.html.

  • Coleman, J. L. (1984). “Economics and the law: A critical review of the foundations of the economic approach to law”, Ethics, 94(4), 649–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. D. (1982). “The cost of Coase”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 11(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, C. J. (1979). “The problem of externality”, Journal of Law and Economics, 22(1), 141–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1964). “The exchange and enforcement of property rights”, Journal of Law and Economics, 7(Oct.), 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolbear, F. T. (1967). “On the theory of optimum externality”, The American Economic Review, 57(1), 90–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, C. (2016). “Marching to a different drummer: Sam Peltzman reflects on George Stigler”, in C. Freedman (ed.), In Search of the Two-Handed Economist, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 375–409.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedland C. (1993). “On Stigler and Stiglerisms”, Journal of Political Economy, 101(5), 780–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitch, E. W. (ed.). (1983). “The fire of truth: A remembrance of law and economics at Chicago, 1932–1970”, Journal of Law and Economics, 26(1), 163–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marciano, A. (2018). “Why is ‘Stigler’s Coase Theorem’ Stiglerian? A methodological explanation”, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 36A, 127–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medema, S. G. (1994). “The myth of two Coases: What Coase is really saying”, Journal of Economic Issues, 28(1), 208–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medema, S. G. (1998). “Wandering the road from pluralism to Posner: The transformation of law and economics in the twentieth century”, History of Political Economy, Suppl. 30, 202–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medema, S. G. (2011). “A case of mistaken identity: George Stigler, ‘The problem of social cost,’ and the Coase theorem”, European Journal of Law and Economics, 31(1), 11–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medema, S. G. (2014). “The curious treatment of the Coase theorem in the environmental economic literature, 1960–1979”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8(1), 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medema, S. G. (2019, forthcoming). “‘Exceptional and unimportant’? The rise, fall, and rebirth of externalities in economic analysis”, History of Political Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. J. (1967). “Pareto optimality and the law”, Oxford Economic Papers, 19(3), 255–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. (1932). The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed., London, Macmillan, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, D. H. (1972). “The problem of social cost revisited”, Journal of Law and Economics, 15(2), 427–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1967). “The monopolistic competition revolution”, in R. E. Kuenne (ed.), Monopolistic Competition Theory: Studies in Impact; Essays in Honour of Edward H. Chamberlin, New York, Wiley. Repr. in R. C. Merton (ed.), The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, vol. 3, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1972, 18–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, W. (1985). “A comment on the Coase theorem”, in A. E. Roth (ed.), Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 599–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1952). The Theory of Price, 2nd ed., New York, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1966). The Theory of Price, 3rd ed., New York, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1972). “The law and economics of public policy: A plea to the scholars”, Journal of Legal Studies, 1(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1982). “The process and progress of economics”, in K.-G. Mäler, Nobel Lectures in Economic Sciences (1981–1990), 1992, publ. for the Nobel Foundation by World Scientific Publishing, 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1984). “The imperial science?” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 86(3), 301–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1987). The Theory of Price, 4th ed., New York, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1988). Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist, New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1989). “Two notes on the Coase theorem”, The Yale Law Journal, 99(3), 631–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1992). “Law or economics?” Journal of Law and Economics, 35(2), 455–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, R. (1963). “On divergences between social cost and private cost”, Economica, 30(119), 309–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veljanovski, C. G. (1982). “The Coase theorems and the economic theory of markets and law”, Kyklos, 35(1), 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Craig Freedman and Steven Medema for their useful comments on an earlier version. Errors and omissions remain mine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNRS, Institut des Sciences Juridique et Philosophique de la Sorbonne (UMR 8103, CNRS & University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne), Paris, France

    Elodie Bertrand

Authors
  1. Elodie Bertrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elodie Bertrand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Craig Freedman

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bertrand, E. (2020). George Stigler, the First Apostle of the “Coase Theorem”. In: Freedman, C. (eds) George Stigler. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56815-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56815-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56814-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56815-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation