Skip to main content

Introduction: Not in Kansas Anymore: Adaptation Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Expanding Adaptation Networks

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture ((PSADVC))

  • 1031 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I examine the manner by which definitions of adaptation draw boundaries between “adaptations” and other forms of sourced cultural and artistic production. I argue that the challenge of defining and delineating adaptation increases for works that have been adapted numerous times in a range of media and across multiple media platforms. Using The Wizard of Oz as a test case, I consider a myriad of Oz-based and Oz-inspired works within the model of a network. The adaptation network, I hold, is the aggregate of narrative moments, reference points, and iconography that comes to be associated with a particular work through successive acts of adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Paul Davis offers a useful distinction between the text that is “fixed” in an author’s words and the culture text which reflects a cultural memory of a work shaped by adaptations, revisions, and rereadings. The author’s text is located in a particular time and place; the culture text is still being created, “Retelling A Christmas Carol: Text and Culture Text,” The American Scholar 59.1 (Winter 1990), 110.

  2. 2.

    The metaphor of the network has gained currency in adaptation studies in recent decades. Simone Murray, for example, uses it to account for the “multidirectional” flow of adaptation, noting that “any node in the network may initiate an adaptation project in any direction,” “The Business of Adaptation: Reading the Market,” in A Companion to Literature, Film, and Adaptation, ed. Deborah Cartmell (West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012), 124. Presumably Murray’s model would include various textual and aesthetic iterations, however her primary concern lies with the industry agents responsible for bringing adaptations into being, and not the myriad permutations of a given work. Kyle Meikle expands Murray’s concept of the network to include textual networks in his analysis of two of Ishmael Reed’s unproduced screenplay adaptations, asserting that they do not represent “failed films or symptoms thereof,” but are “nodes in an adaptation network, texts in and of themselves,” “Towards an Adaptation Network,” Adaptation 6.3 (Sept. 2013): 262. My own use of the metaphor places greater emphasis on reiterative practices of textual networks and the contributions of individual modes of adaptation to those networks.

  3. 3.

    While an assumption has been that teachers use adaptations in place of literary works to the detriment of students’ education, recent essay collections highlight the myriad, fruitful uses of adaptation in the literature classroom. See Deborah Cartmell and Imelda Whelehan, eds., Teaching Adaptations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014) and Dennis Cutchins, Laurence Raw, and James M. Welsh, eds. The Pedagogy of Adaptation (Lanham: Scarecrow Press, 2010).

References

  • Andrew, Dudley. Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basic Instinct. Written by Richard Osborne. New York: Penguin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, L. Frank. The Marvelous Land of Oz. Illustrated by John R. Neill. Chicago: Reilly & Britton, 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Ozma of Oz. Illustrated by John R. Neill. Chicago: Reilly & Britton, 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Patchwork Girl of Oz. Illustrated by John R. Neill. Chicago: Reilly & Britton, 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Illustrated by W.W. Denslow. Chicago: George M. Hill Company, 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Illustrated by Barry Moser. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The [Wonderful] Wizard of Oz. Illustrated by Lisbeth Zwerger. New York: North-South Books, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Illustrated by Robert Ingpen. New York: Sterling Children’s Books, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Illustrated by Michael Sieben. New York: Harper Design, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeder, Amy. Burn the Field. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beja, Morris. Film & Literature: An Introduction. New York: Longman, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevington, David, Anne Marie Welsh, and Michael Greenwald. Shakespeare: Script, Stage, Screen. New York: Pearson, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluestone, George. Novels Into Film. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, John. “Textual Identity and Adaptive Revision: Editing Adaptation as a Fluid Text.” In Adaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions, edited by Jørgen Bruhn, Anne Gjelsvik, and Eirik Frisvold Hanssen, 47–67. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Chosen. Written by Nancy Holder. New York: Simon Pulse, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardwell, Sarah. Adaptation Revisited: Television and the Classic Novel. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M.J. The Wizard of Oz. New York: Scholastic, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartmell, Deborah. Screen Adaptations: Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice: The Relationship Between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, Timothy. Film and Literature: An Introduction and Reader. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Literature on Screen, a History: In the Gap.” In The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen, edited by Deborah Cartmell and Imelda Whelehan, 29–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • “Ekphrasis.” Poetry Foundation, last modified 2016. http://www.poetryfoundation.org/resources/learning/glossary-terms/detail/ekphrasis.

  • Emerald City. Directed by Tarsem Singh. Shaun Cassidy, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairylogue and Radio-Plays. Directed by Francis Boggs and Otis Turner. Written by L. Frank Baum. Selig Polyscope, 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, Stanley. “Interpreting the ‘Variorum.” Critical Inquiry 2, no. 3 (Spring 1976): 465–485. JSTOR.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Game of Life: Wizard of Oz. USAopoly, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraghty, Christine. Now A Major Motion Picture: Film Adaptations of Literature and Drama. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, Tom. “The Cinema of Attraction: Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-Garde.” Wide Angle 8, no. 3/4 (Fall 1986): 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Stuart. “Introduction.” In Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure, edited by David Morley, v–viii. London: Routledge, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, Richard, and Katja Krebs. “Editorial.” Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance 1, no. 1 (2007): 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Stephanie. Adaptations: 35 Great Stories That Have Inspired Great Films. New York: Three Rivers Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Henry. Daisy Miller: A Study. 1878. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1879.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Washington Square. 1880. New York: Penguin, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, Thomas. Film Adaptation and Its Discontents: From Gone with the Wind to The Passion of the Christ. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Adaptation and Intertextuality, or, What Isn’t an Adaptation, and What Does it Matter?” In A Companion to Literature, Film, and Adaptation, edited by Deborah Cartmell, 87–104. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCabe, Colin. “Introduction: Bazinian Adaptation: The Butcher Boy as Example.” In True to the Spirit: Film Adaptation and the Question of Fidelity, edited by Colin MacCabe, Kathleen Murray, and Rick Warner, 3–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, Gregory. Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West. New York: HarperCollins, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, Brian. Novel to Film: An Introduction to the Theory of Adaptation. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Muppets’ Wizard of Oz. Directed by Kirk Thatcher. The Muppets Studio, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musser, Charles. “The Devil’s Parody: Horace McCoy’s Appropriation and Refiguration of Two Hollywood Musicals.” In A Companion to Literature and Film, edited by Robert Stam and Alessandra Raengo, 229–257. Malden: Blackwell, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, Kate. “‘We’re off to see the Wizard’ (Again): Oz Adaptations and the Matter of Fidelity.” In Adaptation Studies: New Approaches, edited by Christa Albrecht-Crane and Dennis Cutchins, 78–96. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oz the Great and Powerful. Directed by Sam Raimi. Walt Disney, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty in Pink. Written by H. B. Gilmour. Toronto: Bantam, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, Peter. “The Turn of the Glass Key: Popular Fiction as Reading Strategy.” Critical Inquiry 11, no. 3 (March 1985): 418–431. JSTOR.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Return to Oz. Directed by Walter Murch. Walt Disney, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Robert. Literature and Film. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Brian. Jekyll and Hyde Adapted: Dramatizations of Cultural Anxiety. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushdie, Salman. “At the Auction of the Ruby Slippers.” In East, West: Stories, 86–103. New York: Vintage, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryman, Geoff. Was. New York: Harper Collins, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Julie. Adaptation and Appropriation. New York: Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skal, David J. Hollywood Gothic: The Tangled Web of Dracula from Novel to Stage to Screen. New York: Faber and Faber, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, Robert. “Introduction: The Theory and Practice of Adaptation.” In Literature and Film: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Film Adaptation, edited by Robert Stam and Alessandra Raengo, 1–52. Malden: Blackwell, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, Robert Louis. Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. 1886. New York: W. W. Norton, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, Mark Evan. Oz Before the Rainbow. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tin Man. Directed by Nick Willing. Sci Fi Channel, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venuti, Lawrence. “Adaptation, Translation, Critique.” Journal of Visual Culture 6, no. 1 (2007): 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicked. Music and lyrics by Stephen Schwartz. Book by Winnie Holzman. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wiz. Directed by Sidney Lumet. Motown, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wizard of Oz. Directed by Larry Semon. Chadwick, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wizard of Oz. Directed by Ted Eshbaugh. Ted Eshbaugh Studios, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wizard of Oz. Directed by Victor Fleming. MGM, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • “The Wizard of Oz.” Written by Adam Green and photographed by Annie Leibovitz. Vogue 195, no. 12 (December 2005): 295–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wizard of Oz Game. Cadaco, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wizard of Oz Yellow Brick Road Game. Pressman Toy Corp., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wiz Live! Directed by Kenny Leon and Matthew Diamond. Universal Television, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Gary. Who Censored Roger Rabbit? New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wonderful Game of Oz. Parker Brothers, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Directed by Otis Turner. Selig Polyscope, 1910.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newell, K. (2017). Introduction: Not in Kansas Anymore: Adaptation Networks. In: Expanding Adaptation Networks. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56712-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics