Skip to main content

Determinants of Internal Communication Effectiveness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communication in Organizational Environments
  • 1803 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses issues related to the effectiveness of internal communication from a praxeological point of view. In the light of quantitative and qualitative research results, the authors will analyse the categories of efficiency, quality, and the effectiveness of internal communication, along with their components. They will also present a theoretical model of interdependence between the determinants of internal communication and its effectiveness, as well as presenting a measuring instrument—an evaluation sheet for the effectiveness of internal communication, which gives rise to an integrated index of internal communication effectiveness. What is more, a list of factors that increase or decrease internal communication effectiveness will also be presented. On the basis of the conclusions, the model of internal communication will be modified and updated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    When analysing the statements of the focus group participants, the researchers decided to introduce a fourth group of determinants, related to the characteristics of messages. This was because the respondents frequently commented on the contents which are transmitted to them within communication activities.

  2. 2.

    The category of efficiency was an exception. In this case, the hierarchy was constructed based on an analysis of correlation coefficients between individual components and the effectiveness of internal communication. The higher the value of the coefficient was, the higher this aspect was placed in the hierarchy.

  3. 3.

    With the reference level set at 4 for all the elements measured and with the assumption that an average rating for the individual elements below a level of 2.0 is a cut-off point beyond which an activity becomes counterproductive.

  4. 4.

    In Poland, however, there is a strong attachment to the five-point scale so it is recommended that this scale should be used in surveys involving Polish respondents (Białowąs 2006, p. 151).

References

  • Adams, K., & Galanes, G. J. (2008). Komunikacja w grupach. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argenti, P. A. (2007). Strategic corporate communication. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • BiaÅ‚owÄ…s, S. (2006). Skale piÄ™cio- i siedmiostopniowe. W poszukiwaniu optimum. In J. Garczarczyk (Ed.), IloÅ›ciowe i jakoÅ›ciowe metody badania rynku. Pomiar i jego skuteczność. PoznaÅ„: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clampitt, P., & Downs, C. (1993). Employee perceptions of the relationship between communication and productivity: A field study. Journal of Business Communication, 30(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. (2011). Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. (2012). Komunikacja korporacyjna, Przewodnik po teorii i praktyce. Warsaw: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czekaj, J., & ZiÄ™bicki, B. (2006). Audyt komunikacyjny w organizacji. In A. StabryÅ‚a (Ed.), Doskonalenie systemĂ³w zarzÄ…dzania w spoÅ‚eczeÅ„stwie informacyjnym. Tom 1. Cracow: Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney, S. (2011). Stakeholder perspective on internal marketing communication. Business Process Management Journal, 17(2), 311–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frydrychowicz, S. (2009). Komunikacja interpersonalna w zarzÄ…dzaniu. PoznaÅ„: Wydawnictwo Forum Naukowe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliers, R. D., & Leidner, D. E. (2003). Strategic information management. Challenges and strategies in managing information systems. Burlington: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gros, U. (2003). Zachowania organizacyjne w teorii i praktyce zarzÄ…dzania. Warsaw: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargie, O., Rainey, S., & Dickson, D. (2003). Working Together, Living Apart: Inter-group Communication within Organizations in Northern Ireland. In: Communication Research and Media Science in Europe, Schorr, A., Campbell, W. i Schenk, M. (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, R. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia for public relations (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. K. (2005). Evaluating public relations effectiveness in a health care setting. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 28(1/2), 282–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz, S. (2004). Corporate conversations: A guide to crafting effective and appropriate internal communications. New York: AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, M., & Strauch, P. (1990). Strategienorientierte Plannung betrieblicher Informations- und Komunikationssysteme. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesca, E., & Lesca, H. (1995). Gestion de l’information. QualitĂ© de l’information et performances de l’entreprise. Paris: Editions Litec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linke, A., & Zerfass, A. (2011). Internal communication and innovation culture: Developing a change framework. Journal of Communication Management, 15(4), 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, A., & Töpfer, A. (1996). Kundenzufriedenheit als Messlatte fĂ¼r den Erfolg. In Kundenzufriedenheit messen und steigern (p. 44). Neuwied, Kriftel, Berlin: Lucherhand Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martyniak, Z. (Ed.). (1997). Elementy zarzÄ…dzania informacjÄ… i komunikacjÄ… w przedsiÄ™biorstwie. Cracow: Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, J., & Berger, B. K. (2012). Measuring return on investment (ROI) of organizations’ internal communication efforts. Journal of Communication Management, 16(4), 332–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mière, M. T. (2012). Communication et Management StratĂ©gique. Etude, Analyse, Enjeux, Éditions universitaires europĂ©ennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morreale, S. P., Spitzberg, B. H., & Barge, J. K. (2007). Komunikacja miÄ™dzy ludźmi. Motywacja, wiedza i umiejÄ™tnoÅ›ci. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestorowicz, R. (2003). Metody badania satysfakcji klienta. In: Innowacje w marketingu. MÅ‚odzi o marketingu II. Sopot: Uniwersytet GdaÅ„ski.

    Google Scholar 

  • OlsztyÅ„ska, A. (2002). Komunikacja wewnÄ™trzna w przedsiÄ™biorstwie. In H. Mruk (Ed.), Komunikowanie siÄ™ w biznesie. PoznaÅ„: Akademii Ekonomicznej w Poznaniu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potocki, A. (2001). Komunikacja wewnÄ™trzna w przedsiÄ™biorstwie. Cracow: Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potocki, A., Winkler, R., & Å»bikowska, A. (2011). Komunikowanie w organizacjach gospodarczych. Warsaw: Difin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirke, B. (2011). Komunikacja wewnÄ™trzna krok po kroku. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska sp. z o.o.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogala, A. (2013). Determinanty skutecznoÅ›ci komunikacji wewnÄ™trznej w przedsiÄ™biorstwie. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Management, PoznaÅ„ University of Economics, PoznaÅ„.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogala, A. (2014). The relations between the internal communication conditionings and its effectiveness. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 7(2), 69–77, University Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogala, A., Wanat, T., Nestorowicz, R., & StefaÅ„ska, M. (2015). The effect of communicating CSR and fair trade on the attitudes and behavior of employees of trading enterprises. In M. StefaÅ„ska & R. Nestorowicz (Eds.), Fair trade in CSR strategy of global retailers (pp. 149–173). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sikorski, C. (2001). Zachowania ludzi w organizacji. Warsaw: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobkowiak, B. (1998). Procesy komunikowania siÄ™ w organizacji. In B. Dobek-Ostrowska (Ed.), WspĂ³Å‚czesne systemy komunikowania. WrocÅ‚aw: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu WrocÅ‚awskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobkowiak, B. (2005). Interpersonalne i grupowe komunikowanie siÄ™ w organizacji. PoznaÅ„/WrocÅ‚aw: Wydawnictwo Forum Naukowe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stayer, R. (1990). How I learnt to let my workers lead. Harvard Business Review, 68, 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • StÄ™pka, P., & Subda, K. (2009). Wykorzystanie analizy sieci spoÅ‚ecznych (SNA) do budowy organizacji opartej na wiedzy, E-mentor nr 1 (28)/2009, http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/. Accessed September 2015.

  • SzymaÅ„ska, A. (2004). Public relations w systemie zintegrowanej komunikacji marketingowej. WrocÅ‚aw: Unimex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourish, D., & Hargie, O. (2000). Strategy, research and pedagogy. The role of audits. In O. Hargie & D. Tourish (Eds.), Handbook of communication audits for organizations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, M. F., & Schoemaker, H. (2004). Accountability of communication management: A balanced scorecard for communication quality. Utrecht: LEMMA Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rogala, A., Bialowas, S. (2016). Determinants of Internal Communication Effectiveness. In: Communication in Organizational Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54703-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics