Skip to main content

Fiscal Policy and Islamic Finance: Malaysia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Macroeconomic Policy and Islamic Finance in Malaysia

Abstract

Malaysian economy has been experiencing economic growth, but at the same time inundated by a deterioration of overall fiscal balance and consequently a rise in national debt. The government is committed to strengthen public finances and achieve a balanced budget by 2020. Based on empirical analysis using fiscal sustainability test and fiscal sustainability indicator, the fiscal position of Malaysia under the existing fiscal framework is sustainable but this sustainability condition is a weak form of sustainability as compared to the stronger sustainability given by an alternative fiscal framework comprising a new tax structure of a flat rate tax on income and wealth and government financing through the issuance of equity participation shares to finance development projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaberge, R., Colombino, U., & Strøm, S. (2000). Labor supply responses and welfare effects from replacing current tax rules by a flat tax: Empirical evidence from Italy, Norway and Sweden. Journal of Population Economics, 13(4), 595–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah, H., Mustafa, M. M., & Dahalan, J. (2012). An empirical study on fiscal sustainability in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(1), 72–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, E., & Best, M. (2012). Financing social policy in the presence of informality. LSE Asia Research Centre, 54, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, E., Best, M., & Pöschl, C. (2012, October). Tax reforms in the presence of informality in developing countries incentives to cheat in Mexico, LSE Asia Research Centre, 56, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angyridis, C. (2013). Endogenous growth with public capital and progressive taxation, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcand, J., Berkes, E., & Panizza, U. (2012). Too much finance? IMF Working Paper, (No. WP/12/161).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P., Cipollini, A., & Fattouh, B. (2004). Threshold effects in the U.S. budget deficit. Economic Inquiry, 42(2), 214–222. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arghyrou, M. G., & Luintel, K. B. (2007). Government solvency: Revisiting some EMU countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 29(2), 387–410. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariff, M. (1998). The Malaysian economic experience and its relevance for the Oic member countries. Islamic Economic Studies, 6(1), 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, B. J. (2008). Do Tax Structures Affect Economic Growth? Empirical Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries, OECD Economics Department Working Paper, No. ECO/WKP(2008)51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artis, M., & Marcellino, M. (2000). The solvency of government finances in Europe. Banca d’Italia, 209–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1971). Capital Taxes, the Redistribution of Wealth and Individual Savings. The Review of Economic Studies, 38(2), 209–227. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, A., Kotlikoff, L., & Leibfritz, W. (1998). Generational accounting around the world. Imes Discussion Paper Series, 98, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baharumshah, A. Z., & Lau, E. (2007). Regime changes and the sustainability of fiscal imbalance in East Asian countries. Economic Modelling, 24(6), 878–894. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajo-Rubio, O., Díaz-Roldán, C., & Esteve, V. (2010). On the sustainability of government deficits: Some long-term evidence for Spain, 1850–2000. Journal of Applied Economics, 13(2), 263–281. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajo-Rubio, O., Dı́az-Roldán, C., & Esteve, V. (2004). Searching for threshold effects in the evolution of budget deficits: An application to the Spanish case. Economics Letters, 82(2), 239–243. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A., Checherita-Westphal, C., & Rother, P. (2013). Debt and growth: New evidence for the Euro area. Journal of International Money and Finance, 32, 809–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. (1990). Suggestion for a new set of fiscal indicators. OECD, Department of Economics and Statistics, 79, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., Chouraqui, J.-C., Hagemann, R. P., & Sartor, N. (1990). The sustainability fiscal policy: New answers to an old question. OECD Economic Studies, 15, 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., Chamberlain, E., & Emmerson, C. (2010). Taxation of wealth and wealth transfers. In Dimensions of Tax Design. The Mirrlees Review. (pp. 737–824). 

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, E., & Browning, J. (1985). Why not a true flat rate tax? Cato Journal, 5(2), 629–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buiter, W. H. (1985). A guide to public sector debt and deficits. Economic Policy, 1(1), 13–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buiter, W. H., Persson, T., & Minford, P. (1985). A guide to public sector debt and deficits. Economic Policy, 1(1), 14–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnside, C. (2004). Assessing New Approaches to Fiscal Sustainability Analysis. World Bank, Mimeo, (September), 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalk, N., & Hemming, R. (2000). Assessing fiscal sustainability in theory and practice. IMF Working Paper, No. WP/00/81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. K. (2012). The progressivity of the Malaysian personal income tax system. Kajian Malaysia, 30(2), 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croce, E., & Juan-Ramón, V. (2003). Assessing fiscal sustainability: A cross country comparison. IMF Working Paper, WP/03/145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P., & Saez, E. (2011). The Case for a Progressive Tax: From Basic Research to Policy Recommendations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 165–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, B. Y. D. A, & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domar, E. D. (1944). The burdern of the debt and the national income. The American Economic Review, 34(4), 798–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D., & Peter, K. S. (2008). Tax progressivity and income inequality tax progressivity and income inequality. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Research Paper Series, 08–26, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D., & Peter, K. S. (2012). Unequal Inequalities: Do Progressive Taxes Reduce Income Inequality? IZA Discussion Paper, (6910), 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute de I’entreprise. (2004). Wealth Tax in Europe: Why the Decline?.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escario, R., Gadea, M. D., & Sabaté, M. (2012). Multicointegration, seigniorage and fiscal sustainability. Spain 1857–2000. Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(2), 270–283. 

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2006, December). European economy. No 3/2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2007). European economy. No 3/2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010). European economy. No 4/2010. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. (2013). Briefing Paper Wealth taxes : problems and practice around the world. Chasm, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, F. D. C., & de Cos, P. (2002). On the sustainability of the Spanish public budget performance. Hacienda Pública Española/Revista de Economía, 3(5), 136–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, R., Khundrakpam, J., & Ray, P. (2004). Is India’s public finance unsustainable? Or, are the claims exaggerated? Journal of Policy Modeling, 26(3), 401–420. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorodnichenko, Y., Martinez‐Vazquez, J., & Sabirianova Peter, K. (2009). Myth and Reality of Flat Tax Reform: Micro Estimates of Tax Evasion Response and Welfare Effects in Russia. Journal of Political Economy, 117(3), 504–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakkio, C. S., & Rush, M. (1991). Is the budget deficit “Too Large?”. Economic Enquiry, 29, 425–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. E., & Rabushka, A. (2007). The flat tax. The Hoover Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D., & Flavin, M. A. (1986). On the limitations of government borrowing: A framework for empirical testing. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 808–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, A. (2002). The wealth tax and economic growth. Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics, No. 2002:20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzinikolaou, D., & Simos, T. (2011). A new test for deficit sustainability and its application to US data. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 45393, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. (2002). Assessing sustainability. Policy Department and Review Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. (2003). Sustainability assessment—Review of application and methodological assessment. Policy Department and Review Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. (2009a, November). The state of public finances cross-country fiscal monitor: November 2009 prepared by the staff of the fiscal affairs department.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. (2009b). World economic outlook october 2009. World Economic Outlook: Sustaining the Recovery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, A., Keen, M., & Klemm, A. (2005, July). Russia’s “flax tax” reform. Economic Policy, 397–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalid, M. A. (2011). Household wealth in Malaysia: Composition and inequality among ethnic groups. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 45, 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalid, M. A. (2014). The colour of inequality. MPH Group Publishing Sdn Bhd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krejdl, A. (2006). Fiscal sustainability-definition, indicators and assessment of Czech public finance sustainability. CNB Working Paper Series, (3), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labeaga, J., Oliver, X., & Spadaro, A. (2008). Discrete choice models of labour supply, behavioural microsimulation and the Spanish tax. The Journal of Economic Inequality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, L. R., Gaglianone, W. P., & Sampaio, R. M. B. (2008). Debt ceiling and fiscal sustainability in Brazil: A quantile autoregression approach. Journal of Development Economics, 86(2), 313–335. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makrydakis, S., Tzavalis, E., & Balfoussias, A. (1999). Policy regime changes and the long-run sustainability of fiscal policy: An application to Greece. Economic Modelling, 16(1), 71–86. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mara, I., & Narazani, E. (2011). The Effects of Flat Tax on Inequality and Informal Employment: The Case of Albania. The Wiiw Balkan Observatory Working Papers, (94), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. M. (2000). US deficit sustainability: A new approach based on multiple endogenous breaks. Journal of Applied Econometrics of Applied, 15(1), 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcdonnell, T. A. (2013). Wealth tax: Options for its implementatin in the Republic of Ireland, (6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki, T. (2014). Fiscal reform and fiscal sustainability: Evidence from Australia and Sweden. International Review of Economics and Finance, 33, 141–151. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Neaime, S. (2015). Sustainability of budget deficits and public debts in selected European Union countries. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 12(1), 1–21. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar, M. A., Noor, A. M., & Meera, A. K. M. (2010). Islamic Pricing Benchmark. International Shari’ah Research Academy for Islamic Finance Research Paper No 16/2010, 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palil, M. R., & Ibrahim, M. A. (2011). The Impacts Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) On Middle Income Earners In Malaysia. World Review of Business Research, 1(3), 192–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palil, M. R., & Mustapha, A. F. (2011). Determinants of tax compliance in Asia : A case of Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 24 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, A., & Peichl, A. (2008). Effects of flat tax reforms in Western Europe on equity and efficiency. FiFo-CPE Discussion Paper, 2008–6, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrica, 75(2), 335–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polito, V., & Wickens, M. (2012). A model-based indicator of the fiscal stance. European Economic Review, 56(3), 526–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polito, V., & Wickens, M. R. (2005). Measuring fiscal sustainability. Discussion Paper Series—Centre for Economic Policy Research London, 44, 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintos, C. E. (1995). Sustainability of the deficit process with structural shifts. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13(4), 409–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafiq, S., & Zeufack, A. (2012). Fiscal multipliers over the growth cycle: Evidence from Malaysia (No. 5982). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2016747.

  • Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This time is different: Eight centuries of financial follies. Pinceton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2010). Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review, 100(2), 573–578. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarno, L. (2001). The behavior of US public debt: A nonlinear perspective. Economics Letters, 74(1), 119–125. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakow, D., & Shuldiner, R. (2000). A comprehensive wealth tax. Tax Law Review, 53(3), 499–585.   

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1993). A simple estimation of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica, 61, 783–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, E. (2013). Fiscal sustainability: A 21st century guide for the perplexed. IMF Working Paper, No. WP/12/89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trehan, B., & Walsh, C. E. (1988). Common trends, the government’s budget constraint, and revenue smoothing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2–3), 425–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trehan, B., & Walsh, C. E. (1991). Testing intertemporal budget constraints: Theory and application to U.S. federal budget and current account deficits. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 23(2), 206–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voinea, L., & Mihaescu, F. (2009). The impact of the flat tax reform on inequality. The case of Romania. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock and the unt root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azura Othman .

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Othman, A., Mat Sari, N., Alhabshi, S., Mirakhor, A. (2017). Fiscal Policy and Islamic Finance: Malaysia. In: Macroeconomic Policy and Islamic Finance in Malaysia. Financial Institutions, Reforms, and Policies in Muslim Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53159-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53159-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53723-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53159-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics