Abstract
Although there has been a general trend towards local government mergers in Western European countries, the trajectories of municipal amalgamations vary widely per country. Through a comparative in-depth analysis of the Netherlands and Flanders we explore what factors help to explain the differences between trajectories of municipal amalgamations, as a starting point for understanding why municipal amalgamations do or do not occur. It is clear that amalgamation trajectories are highly complex and very much embedded in case-specific contexts. Major factors influencing municipal amalgamations trajectories relate to an explanation of path dependence. The complexity of amalgamation processes, however, carries the threat of easy oversimplification. Our conclusion, therefore, is that the deeper processes must be understood as a basis for studies that use more simplified, quantified data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABB (Agency for Internal Administration). 2014a. Beleid van de Vlaamse regering tot stimulering van vrijwillige fusies van gemeenten. Brussels: ABB.
ABB. 2014b. Vlaamse profielschets: Vlaamse gemeenten in kaart gebracht. Brussels: ABB.
Abma, K. 2013. Kiezen tussen kwaden. Gemeentelijke herindeling in Nederland. Vlaams Tijdschrift voor Overheidsmanagement 18: 8–26.
Allers, M.A. 2013. Decentralization with national standards. The case of the Netherlands. In Balance between decentralization and merit, ed. J. Kim, J. Lotz, and N. Jørgen Mau, 119–130. The Korea Institute of Public Finance and the Danish Ministry for Economic Affairs and the Interior.
Allers, M.A., B. Steiner, C. Hoeben, and J.B. Geertsema. 2013. Gemeenten in perspectief. Groningen: COELO.
Baumgartner, F.R., and B.D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bekkers, H., and Y. Koster. 2013. Plasterk maakt herindelingen financieel aantrekkelijker. Binnenlands Bestuur, 17 Jan 2013.
Boon, L. 2013. Plasterk probeert onrust gemeenten over herindeling te sussen. NRC Handelsblad, 14 Mar 2013.
Breeman, G.E., W.J. Van Noort, and M.R. Rutgers. 2012. De Bestuurlijke kaart van Nederland. Bussum: Coutinho.
Brundgaard, U., and K. Vrangbæk. 2007. Reform by coincidence? Explaining the policy process of structural reform in Denmark. Scandinavian Political Studies 30(4): 491–520.
BZK (Ministry of Internal Affairs and Kingdom Relations). 2013a. Beleidskader gemeentelijke herindeling. The Hague: BZK.
BZK. 2013b. Nadere toelichting met betrekking tot gemeentelijke herindeling. 13 maart 2013.
BZK. 2014. Handboek gemeentelijke herindeling. The Hague: BZK.
CBS (Statistics Netherlands). 2015. Statline. http://statline.cbs.nl. Accessed 27 Apr 2015.
Coalition Agreement. 2009. De Vlaamse Regering 2009–2014. Een daadkrachtig Vlaanderen in beslissende tijden. Brussels.
Coalition Agreement. 2012. Bruggen slaan. Regeerakkoord VVD—PvdA. The Hague.
Coalition Agreement. 2014. De Vlaamse regering 2014–2019. Vertrouwen, Verbinden, Vooruitgaan. Brussels.
CPB (Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis). 2013. Decentralisaties in het sociaal domein. The Hague: CPB.
De Ceuninck, K. 2009. De gemeentelijke fusies van 1976. Een mijlpaal voor de lokale besturen in België. Brugge: Vanden Broele.
De Ceuninck, K. 2013. Fusies van gemeenten, spielerei of noodzaak? Een korte blik over de grenzen. Vlaams Tijdschrift voor Overheidsmanagement 18(1): 31–44.
De Ceuninck, K., H. Reynaert, K. Steyvers, and T. Valcke. 2010. Municipal amalgamations in the low countries: Same problems, different solutions. Local Government Studies 36(6): 803–822.
De Peuter, B., V. Pattyn, and E. Wayenberg. 2011. Territorial reform of local government: Evaluation criteria underpinning decisions and debate in Flanders. Local Government Studies 37(5): 533–552.
Dollery, B., and L. Crase. 2004. Is bigger local government better? An evaluation of the case for Australian municipal amalgamation programs. Urban Policy and Research 22(3): 265–275.
Flemish Government. 2010. Nota aan de Vlaamse regering. Betreft: Uitvoering Vlaams regeerakkoord—Vaststelling van een kader ter ondersteuning van vrijwillige fusies van gemeenten—Financiële en organisatorische ondersteuning.
Flemish Government. 2011. Witboek interne staatshervorming. Brussels: Vlaamse overheid.
Fraanje, R., and M. Herweijer. 2013. Innoveren in samenwerking: een alternatief voor herindeling? Bestuurswetenschappen, 3.
Kjaer, U., U. Hjelmar, and A.L. Olsen. 2010. Municipal amalgamations and the democratic functioning of local councils: The case of the Danish 2007 structural reform. Local Government Studies 36(4): 569–585.
KPMG and Eubelius. 2011. Dossier vrijwillige fusieoperatie gemeenten. Rapport TO BE. Brussels: Agentschap voor Binnenlands Bestuur.
Kushner, J., and D. Siegel. 2005. Are services delivered more efficiently after municipal amalgamations? Canadian Public Administration-Administration 48(2): 251–267.
Logtenberg, H., and I. Vriesema. 2014. NRC-enquête: bijna helft burgemeesters wil grotere gemeenten. NRC Handelsblad, 1 Mar 2014.
Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2004. Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reingewertz, Y. 2012. Do municipal amalgamations work? Evidence from municipalities in Israel. Journal of Urban Economics 72(2–3): 240–251.
Smulders, J. 2012. De vrijwillige fusie van gemeenten. Een vergelijkende studie tussen Vlaanderen en Nederland. Leuven: KU Leuven.
Steen, T., and T. Toonen. 2010a. The institutional analysis of central-local relations applied to the case of the Netherlands and Germany. In Policy, performance and management in governance and intergovernmental relations, ed. E. Ongaro, A. Massey, M. Holzer, and E. Wayenberg, 77–88. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Steen, T., and T. Toonen. 2010b. The Netherlands. In Changing government relations in Europe: From localism to intergovernmentalism, ed. M.J. Goldsmith and E.C. Page, 145–162. Milton Park: Routledge.
Steiner, R. 2003. The causes, spread and effects of intermunicipal cooperation and municipal mergers in Switzerland. Public Management Review 5(4): 551–561.
Toonen, T., M. Van Dam, M. Glim, and G. Wallagh. 1998. Gemeenten in ontwikkeling. Herindeling en kwaliteit. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Van Ostaaijen, J. 2007. Nog steeds vreemde buren? De rol van de burgemeester in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Tilburg: Tilburgse School voor Politiek en Bestuur.
Vriesema, I. 2014. Fuseren is strijd—alleen al om de nieuwe naam. NRC Handelsblad, 5 May 2014.
Wayenberg, E., and F. De Rynck. 2008. Kingdom of Belgium. Decentralization and local governments in the world: country profiles. Global Observatory on Local Democracy and Decentralisation; United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Broekema, W., Steen, T., Wayenberg, E. (2016). Explaining Trajectories of Municipal Amalgamations: A Case Comparison of the Netherlands and Flanders. In: Kuhlmann, S., Bouckaert, G. (eds) Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52547-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52548-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)