Skip to main content

Giving Citizens More Say in Local Government: Comparative Analyses of Change Across Europe in Times of Crisis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis

Part of the book series: Governance and Public Management ((GPM))

Abstract

The authors show how institutions for citizen participation in European local government have changed from 1990 until today. Relying on data from an expert survey and focusing on the right of free access to information, the direct election of mayors, and binding local referenda, the authors discover a clear trend of democratic renewal in European local politics. However, the trend is not uniform. The authors also offer some interpretations for the pattern of change they found: Democratic reforms are the result of domestic political factors. But as diffusion theory suggests, the reforms are also externally determined by factors like coercion, learning, and imitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andeweg, R.B., and G.A. Irwin. 1989. Institutional conservatism in the Netherlands: Proposals and resistance to change. In Politics in the Netherlands: How much change? ed. H. Daalder. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldersheim, H., M. Illner, and H. Wollmann (eds.). 2003. Local democracy in post-communist Europe. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies, P., and S. Martin. 2004. Electronic local government and the modernisation agenda: Progress and prospects for public service improvement. Local Government Studies 30(2): 214–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D., and F. Gilardi. 2006. Taking “Galton’s problem” seriously. Towards a theory of policy diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics 18(3): 298–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COE. 1993. Local referendums. Strasbourg: The Council of Europe Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, A., and A. Campbell (eds.). 2008. Local government in Central and Eastern Europe: The rebirth of local democracy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A. 1994. A democratic dilemma. System effectiveness versus citizen participation. Political Science Quarterly 1: 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A. 1998. On democracy. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R.J., and M. Gray. 2003. Expanding the electoral marketplace. In Democracy transformed? Expanding political opportunities in advanced industrial democracies, ed. B.E. Cain, R.J. Dalton, and S.E. Scarrow. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denters, B., and L.E. Rose. 2005. Comparing local governance. Trends and developments. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, P., and B. Kaufmann. 2010. Folkinitiativ: Handbok i direktdemokrati. Stockholm: Premiss förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization 52(4): 887–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, F., A. Lidström, and J. Loughlin (eds.). 2011. The oxford handbook of local and regional democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, J.J., and L.J. Sharpe. 1991. Local government in international perspective: Some comparative observations. In Local government and urban affairs in international perspective, ed. J.J. Hesse. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, P., and C. Copus. 2011. The United Kingdom: Is there really an Anglo model? In The Oxford handbook of local and regional democracy in Europe, ed. F. Hendriks, A. Lidström, and J. Loughlin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jüptner, P., M. Batorova, V. Bubeníček, S. Drezgić, D. Klimovský, and I. Kruntoradova. 2014. Local governance between democracy and efficiency. Novo mesto: Faculty of Organization Studies in Novo mesto and Charles University in Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, N., and A. Vetter. 2003. Reforming local government in Europe: Closing the gap between democracy and efficiency. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, N., J. Caulfield, A. Nickson, D. Olowu, and H. Wollmann. 2009. Local governance reform in global perspective. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klimovský, D. 2009. Klasifikácia spôsobov kreovania základných orgánov obecnej samosprávy v európskej perspective. Acta Politologica 1(3): 241–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koprić, I. 2009. Roles and styles of local political leaders on the territory of the former Yugoslavia: Between authoritarian local political top bosses and citizen-oriented local managers. Hrvatska javna uprava 9(1): 79–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S. 2009. Reforming local government in Germany: Institutional changes and performance impacts. German Politics 18(2): 226–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladner, A. 2002. Size and direct democracy at the local level: The case of Switzerland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20(6): 813–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W., and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvotrup, N. (ed.). 2014. Referendums around the world. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynaert, H. 2005. Revolution or renovation? Reforming local politics in Europe. Bruges: Vanden Broele.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šaradín, P. 2010. Direct elections of mayors in the Czech Republic? Data from research and political support. Contemporary European Studies 2: 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, S.E. 2001. Direct democracy and institutional change: A comparative investigation. Comparative Political Studies 34(6): 651–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap, L., and H. Daemen (eds.). 2012. Renewal in European local democracies: Puzzles, dilemmas and options. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, T. 2011. Local direct democracy in Europe—a comparative overview. In Local direct democracy in Europe, ed. T. Schiller. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, B., and Z. Elkins. 2004. The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review 98(1): 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soós, G., G. Tóka, and G. Wright (eds.). 2002. The state of local democracy in Central Europe. Budapest: OSI/LGI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swianiewicz, P. 2014. An empirical typology of local government systems in Eastern Europe. Local Government Studies 40: 292–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temesi, I. 2000. Local government in Hungary. In Decentralization: Experiences and reforms, ed. T. Horváth. Budapest: OSI/LGI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetter, A. 2006. Modernizing German local government: Bringing the people back in? In State and local government reforms in France and Germany. Divergence and convergence, ed. H. Wollmann and V. Hoffmann-Martinot. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetter, A. 2009. Citizens versus parties. Explaining institutional change in German local government 1989–2008. Local Government Studies 35: 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollmann, H. 2009. The ascent of the directly elected mayor in European local government in West and East. In Local political leadership in Europe: Town chief, city boss or loco president? ed. H. Reynaert, K. Steyvers, P. Delwit, and J.B. Pilet. Bruges/Baden-Baden: Vanden Broele, Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our colleagues from the COST project as well as other research colleagues who supported us by completing our questionnaire: Harald Baldersheim (Norway), Anders Lidström (Sweden); Ulrik Kjær (Denmark); Eva Marín Hlynsdóttir (Iceland); Siv Sandberg (Finland); Colin Copus (UK); Andreas Ladner (Switzerland); Anna Gamper (Austria); Joan Font and Angel Iglesias (Spain); Paolo Fedele (Italy); Vincent Hoffmann-Martinot (France); Kristof Steyvers (Belgium); Nikos Hlepas (Greece); Carlos Nunes Silva (Portugal); Inga Vilka (Latvia); Egidius Barcevicius and Oksana Mejere (Lithuania); Ringa Raudla (Estonia); Paweł Swianiewicz and Adam Gendzwill (Poland); Michal Illner (Czech Republic); Miro Hacek (Slovenia); Gabor Soos (Hungary); Dubravka J. Alibegovic (Croatia); Desislava Stoilova (Bulgaria); Calin Hintea (Romania); Gerard Turley and John McEldowney (Ireland). Because of their small size we excluded Luxembourg, Malta and Cyprus from this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vetter, A., Klimovský, D., Denters, B., Kersting, N. (2016). Giving Citizens More Say in Local Government: Comparative Analyses of Change Across Europe in Times of Crisis. In: Kuhlmann, S., Bouckaert, G. (eds) Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics