Abstract
This chapter discusses the impact of the rise of the BICs on the CMEs’ external trade balances. It is shown that the CMEs, and Germany in particular, have accumulated significant trade surpluses not only inside the euro area but also extra-regionally, and that they have been able to re-orient their exports after the crisis toward the rest of the world. We argue that labor cost dynamics and wage-setting institutions cannot satisfactorily explain the remarkable extra-regional trade performances of the CMEs. This success is to significant extent related to non-price competitiveness factors, more specifically their trade structures in terms of product composition and quality, rooted in the specific skill and innovation regimes of northern euro area member states. These factors have allowed the CMEs to suffer less and profit more from the rise of the BICs than the other euro area member states. Indirectly, they have managed to relatively escape the negative effects of the appreciation of the euro as a consequence of monetary policies of emerging markets. Directly, their production has confronted relatively limited export competition from and high import demand by the BICs. After the crisis, their export strength has allowed them to deflect the adjustment burden completely to the southern euro area and shape reform of the EMU in a way that further reinforces their export interests in the short term, while generating negative spillovers and contradictions in the longer term.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antoniades, A. (2012). Local versus producer currency pricing: Evidence from disaggregated date. International Economic Review, 53(4), 1229–1241.
Baccaro, L., & Benassi, C. (2014). Softening industrial relations institutions, hardening growth model: The transformation of the German political economy. Stato é Mercato, 3, 369–396.
Baldwin, R. E. (Ed.). (2009). The great trade collapse: Causes, consequences and prospects. London: CEPR.
Busemeyer, M. R. (2009). Asset specificity, institutional complementarities and the variety of skill regimes in coordinated market economies. Socio-Economic Review, 7(3), 375–406.
Busemeyer, M. R., & Schlicht-Schmälze, R. (2014). Partisan power, economic coordination and variations in vocational training systems in Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 20(1), 55–71.
Carlin, W., & Soskice, D. (2009). German economic performance: Disentangling the role of supply-side reforms, macroeconomic policy and coordinated economy institutions. Socio-Economic Review, 7(1), 67–99.
Council of the European Union. (2013). Press release: 3220th Council meeting: Economic and financial affairs, Brussels, 12 February, 6083/13.
Culpepper, P. D. (2007). Small states and skill specificity: Austria, Switzerland, and interemployer cleavages in coordinated capitalism. Comparative Political Studies, 40(6), 611–637.
Decramer, S., Fuss, C., & Konings, J. (2014). How do exporters react to changes in cost competitiveness? (ECB working paper no. 1752).
Dustmann, C., Fitzenberger, B., Schönberg, U., & Spitz-Oener, A. (2014). From sick man of Europe to economic superstar: Germany’s resurgent economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1), 167–188.
Eichhorst, W., & Marx, P. (2011). Reforming German labour market institutions: A dual path to flexibility. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(1), 73–87.
European Commission. (2013). Industrial performance scoreboard: A Europe 2020 initiative (Commission staff working document, Ares (2013)3771189)). Brussels: European Union.
European Commission. (2014a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Region: For a European industrial renaissance. Brussels, 22.1.2014, COM(2014)14 final.
European Commission. (2014b). Innovation Union scoreboard 2014. Brussels: European Union.
European Commission. (2014c). Macroeconomic imbalances: Germany 2014 (European Economy occasional papers no. 174). Brussels: European Commission.
Guillemette, Y., & Turner, D. (2013). Policy options to durably resolve euro area imbalances (OECD Economics Department working papers no. 1035).
Hancké, B. (2013). Unions, central banks, and EMU: Labour market institutions and monetary integration in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hassel, A. (2014). The paradox of liberalization—Understanding dualism and recovery of the German political economy. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(1), 57–81.
Herrmann, A. M., & Peine, A. (2011). When “national innovation system” meet “varieties of capitalism” arguments on labour qualifications: On the skill types and scientific knowledge needed for radical and incremental innovations. Research Policy, 40(5), 687–701.
Höpner, M., & Lutter, M. (2014). One currency and many models of wage formation: Why the eurozone is too heterogeneous for the euro (MPIfG discussion paper no. 14/14). Cologne: MPIfG.
Johnson, R. C. (2014). Five facts about value-added exports and implications for macroeconomics and trade research. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 119–142.
Johnston, A., Hancké, B., & Pant, S. (2014). Comparative institutional advantage in the European sovereign debt crisis. Comparative Political Studies, 47(13), 1771–1800.
Makkonen, T., & Lin, B. (2012). Continuing vocational training and innovation in Europe. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 11(4), 325–338.
Moghadam, R., Teja, R., & Berkmen, P. (2014). Euro area: ‘Deflation’ versus ‘lowflation’. IMFdirect–The IMF’s global economic forum. Available at http://blog-imfdirect.imf.org/2014/03/04/euro-area-deflation-versus-lowflation/
Reisenbichler, A., & Morgan, K. J. (2013). How Germany won the euro crisis. Foreign Affairs. Available at https://www.foreignaffairs.org/articles/europe/2013-06-20/how-germany-won-euro-crisis
Scharpf, F. W. (2011). Monetary union, fiscal crisis and the preemption of democracy (MPIfG discussion paper no. 11/11). Cologne: MPIfG.
Thelen, K. A., & Busemeyer, M. R. (2008). From collectivism towards segmentalism: Institutional change in German vocation training (MPIfG Discussion Paper 08/13). Cologne: MPIfG.
Thorbecke, W., & Kato, A. (2012). The effect of exchange rate changes on Germany’s exports (RIETI Discussion Paper Series 12-E-081). Tokyo: RIETI.
Traxler, F., & Brandl, B. (2012). Collective bargaining, inter-sectoral heterogeneity and competitiveness: A cross-national comparison of macroeconomic performance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(1), 73–98.
Ubide, A. (2014). Is the European Central Bank failing its price stability mandate? (PIIE policy brief no. 14-5). Washington, DC: PIIE.
Vermeiren, M. (2014). Power and imbalances in the global monetary system: A comparative capitalism perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wierts, P., Van Kerkhoff, H., & De Haan, J. (2014). Composition of exports and export performance of eurozone countries. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(4), 928–941.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Ville, F., Vermeiren, M. (2016). CMEs: Profiting from the BICs’ Industrialization. In: Rising Powers and Economic Crisis in the Euro Area. Global Reordering. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51440-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51440-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51439-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51440-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)