Skip to main content

Summary and Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Postenvironmentalism
  • 240 Accesses

Abstract

We are now at the conclusion of this journey through the development of environmental thinking, which explored the debate on the mainstreaming and subsequent death of environmentalism, together with the most recent scholarly and practitioners’ contributions on post-environmentalism. This chapter, thus, summarizes it and, building upon the transformation of post-environmentalism into postenvironmentalism (a transformation entailing a new worldview, rather than the simple removing a hyphen), it traces a tentative manifesto of the future environmental thinking in action. Particularly, it criticizes the idea that we are really facing the end of environmentalism and, rather, suggest that new postenvironmentalist practices are already mushrooming worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barry, A. 2001. Political Machines. Governing a Technological Society. London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter. The Political Ecology of Things. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blühdorn, I., and Welsh, I. 2008. The Politics of Unsustainability: Eco-Politics in the Post-Environmental Era. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, B., and Whatmore, S.J. 2010. Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy and Public Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. 2006. “The Future of Environmentalism.” Soundings n. 34, Nov.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoff, P. 1996. “Ecological Modernisation, Ecological Modernities.” Environmental Politics 5/3: 209–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darier, E. 1999. Discourses of the Environment. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Hinnawi, E. 1985. “Environmental Refugees.” UNEP, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, D.J. 2008. Resistance, Space and Political Identities: The Making of Counter-Global Networks. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, T. 1994. Environmental Thought. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, T.F. 2001. Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, C. 1998. “Whose Nature, Whose Culture? Private Productions of Space and the ‘Preservation’ of Nature’.” In Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium edited by B. Brawn and N. Castree. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ksentini, Z. 1994. “Human Rights and the Environment.” UNHRC. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 2008. “‘It’s Development, Stupid !’ or: How to Modernize Modernization.” In Post-environmentalism edited by J. Proctor. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. 2007. Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics. Lancaster. Lancaster University Centre for Science Studies. http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/centres/css/ant/ant.htm.

  • Lomborg, B. 2001. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez Alier, J. 2003. The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (MA): Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K. 1996. Environmentalism and Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A., and Law, J. 2002. Complexities. Durhamf: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J. 2006. Post-Structuralist Geography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neri, V. 2004. “FAI modelli organizzativi e dialettica istituzionale di un’associazione postambientalista.” Equilibri. Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, W. 1993. “Global Ecology and the Shadow of ‘Development’.” In Global Ecology: A New Arena of Political Conflict edited by W. Sachs. Halifax (Nova Scotia): Fernwood Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellenberger, M., and T. Nordhaus. 2004. The Death of Environmentalism. Global Warming Politics in a Post-Environmental World. The Breacktrought institute. http://thebreakthrough.org/archive/the_death_of_environmentalism.

  • Soja, E. 2010. Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. 2013. “Resistance: Do the Ends Justify the Means?.” In Is Sustainability Still Possible? edited by Worldwatch Institute (Linda Stark, ed.), State of the World 2013, 304–316, 421–423. Washington (DC): Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.N. 1992. “Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.” Conference on Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro, June 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S. 2003. “Introduction: More than Human Geographies.” In Handbook of Cultural Geography edited by K. Anserson, M. Domosh, S. Pile and N. Thrift. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Certomà, C. (2016). Summary and Conclusion. In: Postenvironmentalism. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50790-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics