Skip to main content

Ion’s Aporia: Just Another Oedipus?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy and Myth in Contemporary Culture

Part of the book series: Studies in the Psychosocial ((STIP))

  • 722 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces Euripides’ play Ion and the main character as an aporetic subject. The play offers ideal grounds for the convergence between Lacan, Baudrillard, and Stiegler. Fearless speech (parrhesia as defined by Foucault) is comparable to Lacan’s full speech, a mode of speaking in which the subject is sustained by nothing else but their aporia. In Baudrillard, this moment corresponds to an impossible exchange between conventional truth and truth as an unassimilable piece of knowledge. From Stiegler’s perspective, the Ion articulates the young man’s demand for an interpretation (hermeneia) of the past that will set the conditions for a hopeful future in democratic Athens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Both Oedipus and Ion are exposed infants. Oedipus’ character is established, and no new facet develops during the dramatic action. He has a hasty temper, and his pursuit of truth is passionate. He refuses to be convinced by his adopted parents, Polybus and Merope. In the Ion, the young hero is inexperienced, and action is entirely human. Nothing is known by Ion. Unlike Oedipus’ first entry on stage, Ion’s monody reveals sensitivity and lack of maturity.

  2. 2.

    ‘The thought of the outside’, is the title of Foucault ’s writing (2003), which explores the limits of language and the margin beyond meaning and signification.

  3. 3.

    Privation, frustration, and castration are three types of lack of object , each referring to a different order, the Real , the Imaginary, and the Symbolic. Privation refers to the loss of the object a (Evans 1996: 151).

  4. 4.

    See Barlow (1971) for a comprehensive reading of the monody.

  5. 5.

    Unless otherwise indicated, all translations are by Vellacott ([1954] 1973); Greek text and commentary by Owen (1939).

  6. 6.

    Ion will later add that he himself is probably the product of ‘injustice’ or ‘error’ (325).

  7. 7.

    Froma Zeitlin’s (1995) account of the construction of the self in the Ion is one of the most accomplished and insightful readings of the play.

  8. 8.

    Even before psychoanalysis gained currency in the Classics, scholars noted the ‘unconscious ’ affinity between Creusa and Ion (see Conacher 1967; Wolff 1965; Grube 1941). For a feminist account of Creusa’s character, see Rabinowitz Sorkin (1993).

  9. 9.

    Defences attempt to (a) undo what has been done or (b) isolate the ugly (Freud [1926] 1993: 274–8).

  10. 10.

    This is a moment at which one is coming to terms with the inconsistency of the Other , namely that no one ‘pulls the strings’ of the subject. This moment can be liberating, as one gets to see that the Other has no power over one, and devastating, as one loses the safety net of a robust set of reference points and ideals (Žižek 1994: 59).

  11. 11.

    Truman Burbank (Jim Carrey), an insurance salesman, thinks he lives an idyllic life on Seahaven Island. What he does not know is that he is the hero of a 24/7 reality broadcast and actually lives on an elaborate stage setting. His whole world is the enclosed space of Seahaven Island—until of course he begins to notice some strange repetitions.

Bibliography

  • Barlow, S. (1971). The Imagery of Euripides: A Study in the Dramatic Use of Pictorial Landscape. London: Methuen and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. ([1976] 2004). Symbolic Exchange and Death (I. Hamilton Grant, Trans.). London: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett Pippin, A. (1962). Human Resistance and Divine Persuasion in Euripides’ Ion. Classical Philology, 57, 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett Pippin, A. (1971). Catastrophe Survived: Euripides’ Plays of Mixed Reversal. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conacher, D. J. (1959). The Paradox of Euripides’ Ion. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 90, 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conacher, D. J. (1967). Euripidean Drama: Myth, Theme and Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2008). The Gift of Death and Literature and Secret (D. Wills, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Pietro, W. S. (1996). Euripides’ Ion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. (1996). An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B. (1997). The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2001). Fearless Speech. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003). The Thought of the Outside. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The Essential Foucault (pp. 423–441). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1926). Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety. In J. S. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), On Psychopathology: Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety and Other Works (The Penguin Freud Library 10). Reprinted in 1993, London: Penguin Books, pp. 227–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gane, M. (2000). Modern European Thinkers: Jean Baudrillard: In Radical Uncertainty. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhill, S. (1984). Exegesis: Oedipus (R)ex. Arethusa, 17, 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhill, S. (1986). Reading Greek Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grigg, R. (2006). Beyond the Oedipus Complex. In J. Clemens & R. Grigg (Eds.), Jacques Lacan and the Other Side of Psychoanalysis, Reflections on Seminar XVII (pp. 50–68). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grube, G. M. A. (1941). The Drama of Euripides. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitto, H. D. F. (1966). Greek Tragedy, A Literary Study. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1981). Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis (A. Wilden, Trans. with notes). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1991). The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1993). The Psychoses, the Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book III 1955–6 (R. Grigg, Trans.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (2007). The Other Side of Psychoanalysis. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVII (R. Grigg, Trans.). New York: Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddell, H. G., & Scott, R. (1997). An Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon (7th ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, A. S. (1939). Euripides’ Ion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz Sorkin, N. (1993). Anxiety Veiled: Euripides and the Traffic in Women. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, E. (1968). Euripides: Poet of Paradox. In E. Segal, A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 1–12). London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time 1 the Fault of Epimetheus (R. Beardsworth & G. Collins, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2013a). What Makes Life Worth Living: On Pharmacology (D. Ross, Trans.). London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2013b). Uncontrollable Societies of Disaffected Individuals, Disbelief and Discredit (Vol. 2, D. Ross, Trans.). London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2014). The Lost Spirit of Capitalism, Disbelief and Discredit (Vol. 3, D. Ross, Trans.). London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Truman Show. (1998). P. Weir, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellacott, P. (1954). Euripides. The Bacchae and Other Plays: Ion, the Women of Troy, Helen, the Bacchae. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheaghe, P. (2006). Enjoyment and Impossibility: Lacan’s Revision of the Oedipus Complex. In J. Clemens & R. Grigg (Eds.), Jacques Lacan and the Other Side of Psychoanalysis, Reflections on Seminar XVII (pp. 29–49). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, C. (1974). Euripides and the Full Circle of Myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1969). Euripides: Poietes Sophos. Arethusa, 2, 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, C. (1965). The Design and Myth in Euripides’ Ion. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 69, 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, F. (1995). ‘Mysteries of Identity and Design of the Self in Euripides’ Ion. In F. Zeitlin (Ed.), Playing the Other, Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature (pp. 285–240). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1992). The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1994). Enjoy Your Symptom, Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1998). Four Discourses, Four Subjects. In S. Žižek (Ed.), Cogito and the Unconscious (pp. 74–116). Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1999). The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupančič, A. (2000). Ethics of the Real. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupančič, A. (2006). When Surplus Enjoyment Meets Surplus Value. In J. Clemens & R. Grigg (Eds.), Jacques Lacan and the Other Side of Psychoanalysis, Reflections on Seminar XVII (pp. 155–178). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angie Voela .

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Voela, A. (2017). Ion’s Aporia: Just Another Oedipus?. In: Psychoanalysis, Philosophy and Myth in Contemporary Culture. Studies in the Psychosocial. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48347-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics