Skip to main content

Emotional Dimensions of Dirty Work: Butchers and the Meat Trade

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender, Class and Occupation

Abstract

This chapter explores the emotional dimensions of dirty work. In particular, looking at the meat trade, it investigates how butchers draw on and activate emotions in managing the ‘dirtiness’ of the job. Thus, we address the question: what emotions do butchers convey as they discuss key aspects of work practices and their work role? While a body of research has explored how dirty workers manage taint in a variety of occupations (e.g. Dick 2005; Tracy and Scott 2006; Ackroyd and Crowdy 1990), and in so doing have revealed some of the emotional elements involved (Simpson et al. 2011), few studies have made it a central concern—despite well-established recognition of the need to incorporate emotions into analyses of work (e.g. Fineman 1993, 2003). A focus on emotions helps us to explore how the social and the material intertwine through ‘relational’ aspects where emotions are not just a property of the self but more importantly a product and manifestation of the relationship between the individual and the world. In surfacing in a more explicit sense the emotional dynamics of dirty work, we point to, in accordance with some other research (Bolton 2005; Duffy 2007; Perry 1978), the significance of disgust, shame, pleasure, and pride. In addition, in the context of recent ‘cleansing’ and regulation of the trade, we highlight how nostalgia, as ‘a positively toned evocation of a lived past’ (Belk 1990), marks men’s response to how the work is experienced. We consider these themes in the light of a ‘dirty work habitus’, showing how the emotional dynamics of dirty work are complex and ambiguous and how an understanding of these dimensions must be framed within a specific ‘field’ of class and gender relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackroyd, S. (2007). Dirt, work and dignity. In S. Bolton (Ed.), Dimensions of dignity at work (pp. 30–51). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ackroyd, S., & Crowdy, P. (1990). Can culture be managed? Working with raw material: The case of the English slaughterhouse workers. Personnel Review, 19(5), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. J. (1990). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist vegetarian critical theory. New York: Continuum International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (2000). Doing the dirty work: The global politics of domestic labour. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B., & Kreiner, G. (1999). “How can you do it?” Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 413–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkanasy, N., & Daus, C. (2002). Emotion in the workplace: The new challenge for managers. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 328–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. (1990). The role of possessions in constructing and maintaining a sense of the past. In M. Goldberg, G. Gorn, & R. Pollay (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 17, pp. 669–676). Urbana: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, S. (2007). Dimensions of dignity a work. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, S. (2000). A phenomenology of the working class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2000). The men and the boys. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, P. (2005). Dirty work designations: How police officers account for their use of coercive force. Human Relations, 58(11), 1363–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M. (2007). Doing the dirty work: Gender, race and reproductive labour in historical perspective. Gender and Society, 21(3), 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S. (1993). Emotions in organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S. (2003). Understanding emotion at work. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S. (2008). The emotional organization: Passions and power. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. (1993). Organizational nostalgia—Reflections on ‘the golden age’. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations (pp. 119–141). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1968). Stigma. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss, D. (2008). Enterprise ritual: A theory of entrepreneurial emotion and exchange. British Journal of Management, 19(2), 120–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandy, G. (2008). Managing spoiled identities: Dirty workers’ struggles for a favourable sense of self. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 3(3), 176–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, P., & Wadsworth, J. (2003). Labour market prospects of less skilled workers over the recovery. In R. Dickens, P. Gregg, & J. Wadsworth (Eds.), The labour market under new labour: The state of working Britain (pp. 86–98). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialisation of feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holak, S., & Havlena, W. (1998). Feelings, fantasies and memories: An examination of the emotional components of nostalgia. Journal of Business Research, 42(3), 217–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, E. (1958). Men and their work. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, L. (2001). The pollution of incontinence and the dirty work of care giving in a US nursing home. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 15(1), 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, S. (2004). Rules of engagement: Habitus, power and resistance. In L. Adkins & B. Skeggs (Eds.), Feminism after Bourdieu (pp. 110–128). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial leather. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, L. (2003). Redundant masculinities: Employment change and white working class youth. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McMurray, R., & Ward, J. (2014). ‘Why would you want to do that?’ Defining emotional dirty work. Human Relations, 67(9), 1123–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meara, H. (1974). Honor in dirty work: The case of American meatcutters and Turkish butchers. Work and Occupation, 1(3), 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., & Schejbal, A. (2007). Bedpans, blood and bile: Doing the dirty work in nursing. In S. Drew, M. Mills, & B. Gassaway (Eds.), Dirty work (pp. 113–132). Waco: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, S. (2005). Ugly Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, D. (2009). ‘I can’t put a smiley face on’: Working class masculinity, emotional labour and service work in the ‘new economy’. Gender, Work and Organization, 16(3), 302–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. (1978). Collecting garbage. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probyn, E. (2000). Carnal appetites: Foodsexidentities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probyn, E. (2004). Shame in the habitus. In L. Adkins & B. Skeggs (Eds.), Feminism after Bourdieu (pp. 224–248). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullen, A., & Simpson, R. (2009). Managing difference in feminized work: Men otherness and social practice. Human Relations, 62(4), 561–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. (2001). Class in modern Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2005). The moral significance of class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selmi, G. (2012). Dirty talks and gender cleanliness: An account of identity management practices in phone sex work. In R. Simpson, N. Slutskaya, P. Lewis, & H. Hopfl (Eds.), Dirty work: Concepts and identities (pp. 113–125). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R., & Cobb, J. (1972). The hidden injuries of class. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilling, C. (2004). Physical capital and situated action: A new direction for corporeal sociology. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 473–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilling, C. (2012). The Body and Social Theory, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (2004a). Class, self and culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (2004b). Exchange, value and affect: Bourdieu and the self. In L. Adkins & B. Skeggs (Eds.), Feminism after Bourdieu (pp. 75–95). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, C. (2005). Finding dignity in dirty work: The constraints and rewards of low-wage home care labour. Sociology of Health and Illness, 27(6), 831–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. (2012). Reconceptualising dirty work: Investment banking and the financial crisis. In R. Simpson, N. Slutskaya, P. Lewis, & H. Hopfl (Eds.), Dirty work: Concepts and identities (pp. 49–65). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, S., & Scott, C. (2006). Sexuality, masculinity and taint management among firefighters and correctional officers: Getting down and dirty with “America’s heroes” and the “scum of law enforcement”. Management Communication Quarterly, 20(1), 6–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (1995). Pugs at work: Bodily capital and bodily labour among professional boxers. Body & Society, 1(1), 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (2003). Reclassifying upward mobility: Femininity and the neo-liberal subject. Gender and Education, 15(3), 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simpson, R., Hughes, J., Slutskaya, N. (2016). Emotional Dimensions of Dirty Work: Butchers and the Meat Trade. In: Gender, Class and Occupation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43969-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics