Abstract
While cities increasingly attest to plans to make their resources accessible for people with disabilities, the realities of achieving the travel considered integral to urban life continue to be frustrating and prohibitive for this group. Accessing the basic opportunities of contemporary urban life now presupposes the supports and resources afforded by new mobilities, combining virtual and actual travel and communication in negotiating our work, leisure, connections with families, and culture. For the researchers applying the new mobilities paradigm, this requires a focus that is suited to capturing movement and its spatial and temporal coordinates and should also turn to illuminate the darker side of these relationships: coerced immobility experienced by people with disabilities. This chapter discusses an approach to research and the development of design scenarios — concepts emerging from research that may inform design — that take seriously the role of movement, time, and space in the achievement of valued connections by individuals with disabilities with particular reference to the journey to work. In particular we apply, in a case study, concepts of time and space that are relevant to the in situ experience of getting to work; raising questions regarding the way getting ready and travelling are experienced in the context of risk and contingency, and the actual and potential role of the technical, material, and social environment. We then respond to the analysis of this case with a discussion about the way emergent scenarios can imagine “possible or preferable futures” for the mobile citizenship of people with disabilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adam, B. (1995). Timewatch. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Adam, B. (2006). “Time.” Theory, Culture & Society, 23 (2–3), pp. 119–138.
Audirac, I. (2008). “Accessing Transit as Universal Design.” Journal of Planning Literature, 23 (1), pp. 4–16. doi: 10.1177/0885412208318558
Bissell, D. (2007). “Animating suspension: Waiting for mobilities.” Mobilities, 2 (2), pp. 277–298.
Brighenti, A. B. (2012). “New media and urban motilities: A territoriologic point of view.” Urban Studies, 49 (2), pp. 399–414.
Carroll, J. M. (1997). “Scenario-based design.” In M. Helandaer, T. K. Landauer, and P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction ( 2nd ed. ) (pp. 383–406 ). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Cass, N., Shove, E., and Urry, J. (2005). “Social exclusion, mobility and access.” The Sociological Review, 53 (3), pp. 539–555.
Chamorro-Koc, M., Bucolo, S., and Adkins, B. (2012). “Using scenarios to explore the social aspects of design led innovations.” In A. Villela (ed.), Projecting Design 2012: Global Design Bridge (pp. 186–191 ). Santiago, Chile: DUOC.
Chouinard, V. (1997). “Making space for disabling difference: Challenges ableist geographies.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15, pp. 379–387.
Freund, P. (2001). “Bodies, disability and spaces: The social model and disabling spatial organizations.” Disability & Society, 16 (5), pp. 689–706.
Garland-Thompson, R. (2011). “Misfits: A feminist materialist disability concept.” Hypatia, 26 (3), pp. 591–609.
Gleeson, B. (1999). Geographies of disability. London: Routledge.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Micro studies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.
Hughes, B., Russell, R., and Paterson, K. (2005). “Nothing to be had ‘off the peg’: Consumption, identity and the immobilization of young disabled people.” Disability & Society, 20 (1), pp. 3–17.
Jensen, O. B. (2006). “‘Facework,’ flow and the city: Simmel, Goffman, and mobility in the contemporary city.” Mobilities, 1 (2), pp. 143–165.
Kitchin, R. (1998). “‘Out of place,’ knowing one’s place: Space, power, and the exclusion of disabled people. Disability & Society, 13(3), pp. 343–356.
Litman, T. (2011). “Measuring transportation: Traffic, mobility, and accessibility.” Victoria Transport Policy Institute, March 1, 2011.
Marston, G., and Lantz, S. (2012). “Policy, citizenship and governance: The case of disability and employment policy in Australia.” Disability and Society, 27 (6), pp. 853–867.
Misztal, B. (2001). “Normality and trust in Goffman’s theory of the interaction order.” Sociological Theory, 19 (3), pp. 312–324.
Moser, I. (2006). “Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal.” Information, Communication & Society, 9 (3), pp. 373–395.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers. Paris: OECD.
Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
Urry, J. (2002). “Mobility and proximity.” Sociology, 36 (20), pp. 255–274.
Urry, J. (2004). “The system of automobility.” Theory, Culture & Society, 21 (4/5), pp. 25–39.
Urry, J. (2008). Mobilities. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Urry, J. (2012). “Does mobility have a future?” In M. Grieco and J. Urry (eds.), Mobilities: New Perspectives on Transport and Society. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Walker, J. (2012). Human transit: How clearer thinking about public transit can enrich our communities and our lives. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Willis, A. M. (2005). “Scenarios, futures and design.” Design Philosophy Papers, 3 (1), pp. 1–37.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Barbara Adkins, Marianella Chamorro-Koc, and Lisa Stafford
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adkins, B., Chamorro-Koc, M., Stafford, L. (2015). New Mobilities for Accessible Cities: Toward Scenarios for Seamless Journeys. In: Araya, D. (eds) Smart Cities as Democratic Ecologies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377203_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377203_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-37719-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37720-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)