Skip to main content

High recursively enumerable degrees and the anti-cupping property

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic Year 1979–80

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mathematics ((LNM,volume 859))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. B. Cooper, Minimal pairs and high recursively enumerable degrees, J. Symbolic Logic 39 (1974), 655–660.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. P. A. Fejer, The structure of definable subclasses of the recursively enumerable degrees, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. A. Fejer and R. I. Soare, The plus-cupping theorem for the recursively enumerable degrees, these Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. M. Friedberg, Two recursively enumerable sets of incomparable degrees of unsolvability, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sciences, U.S.A. 43 (1957), 236–238.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. A. H. Lachlan, Lower bounds for pairs of r.e. degrees, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 16 (1966), 537–569.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. A. H. Lachlan, The impossibility of finding relative complements for recursively enumerable degrees, J. Symbolic Logic 31 (1966), 434–454.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. R. E. Ladner and L. P. Sasso, The weak truth table degrees of recursively enumerable sets, Ann. Math. Logic 4 (1975), 429–448.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Lerman, Admissible ordinals and priority arguments, Proceedings of the Cambridge Summer School in Logic, 1971, Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Math., No. 337, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. P. Miller, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Chicago, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. A. Muchnik, On the unsolvability of the problem of reducibility in the theory of algorithms (Russ.), Doklady Academii Nauk SSSR, n.s., 108 (1956), 194–197.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. R. W. Robinson, A dichotomy of the recursively enumerable sets, Zeitschr. f. Math. Logik und Grundlagen d. Math. 14 (1968), 339–356.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Rogers, Jr., Theory of recursive functions and effective computability, McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 1967.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. G. E. Sacks, Recursive enumerability and the jump operator, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 108 (1963), 223–239.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. G. E. Sacks, The recursively enumerable degrees are dense, Annals Math. (2) 80 (1964), 300–312.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. G. E. Sacks, Degrees of Unsolvability, rev. ed., Annals of Math. Studies, No. 55, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1966.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. J. R. Shoenfield, Undecidable and creative theories, Fundamenta Mathematicae 49 (1961), 171–179.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. J. R. Shoenfield, Applications of model theory to degrees of unsolvability, 359–363, Symposium on the Theory of Models, North Holland, 1965.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. R. I. Soare, The infinite injury priority method, J. Symbolic Logic 41 (1976), 513–530.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. R. I. Soare, Fundamental methods for constructing recursively enumerable degrees, Recursion Theory, Its Generalizations and Applications, Logic Colloquium 79, Leeds, Cambridge University Press, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. E. M. Yates, A minimal pair of r.e. degrees, J. Symbolic Logic 31 (1966), 159–168.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Manuel Lerman James H. Schmerl Robert I. Soare

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Miller, D.P. (1981). High recursively enumerable degrees and the anti-cupping property. In: Lerman, M., Schmerl, J.H., Soare, R.I. (eds) Logic Year 1979–80. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 859. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0090950

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0090950

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-10708-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38673-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics