Skip to main content

The plus-cupping theorem for the recursively enumerable degrees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic Year 1979–80

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mathematics ((LNM,volume 859))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. B. Cooper, On a theorem of C.E.M.Yates, handwritten notes,1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Harrington, On Cooper's proof of a theorem of Yates I, and II, handwritten notes, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Harrington, Plus-cupping in the r.e. degrees, handwritten notes, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. H. Lachlan, The impossibility of finding relative complements for recursively enumerable degrees, J. Symbolic Logic 31 (1966), 434–454.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. —, Lower bounds for pairs of r.e. degrees, Proc. London Math. Soc. 16 (1966), 537–567.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. —, A recursively enumerable degree which will not split over all lesser ones, Ann. Math. Logic 9 (1975), 307–365.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. —, Bounding minimal pairs, J. Symbolic Logic 44 (1979), 626–642.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. David Miller, High recursively enumerable degrees and the anti-cupping property, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Rogers, Jr., Theory of recursive functions and effective computability, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. G. E. Sacks, On the degrees less than O, Ann. of Math. (2) 77 (1963), 211–231.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. —, The recursively enumerable degrees are dense, Ann. of Math. (2) 80 (1964), 300–312.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. J. R. Shoenfield, Application of model theory to degrees of unsolvability, Sympos. Theory of Models, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965, 359–363.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. I. Soare, The infinite injury priority method, J. Symbolic Logic 41 (1976), 513–530.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. R. I. Soare, Recursively enumerable sets and degrees, Bull. A.M.S. 84 (1978), 1149–1181.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R. I. Soare, Fundamental methods for constructing recursively enumerable degrees, Recursion theory, its generalizations and applications, Logic Colloquium 79, Leeds, England, Cambridge University Press, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. E. M. Yates, A minimal pair of r.e. degrees, J. Symbolic Logic 31 (1966), 159–168.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Manuel Lerman James H. Schmerl Robert I. Soare

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fejer, P.A., Soare, R.I. (1981). The plus-cupping theorem for the recursively enumerable degrees. In: Lerman, M., Schmerl, J.H., Soare, R.I. (eds) Logic Year 1979–80. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 859. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0090938

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0090938

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-10708-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38673-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics