Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

L-functions for G×GL(n)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Explicit Constructions of Automorphic L-Functions

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mathematics ((LNM,volume 1254))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References for Appendix

  1. W. Casselman and J. Shalika, “The unramified principal series of p-adic groups II: The Whittaker function”, Compositio Math., Vol. 41, Fasc. 2 (1980), pp. 207–231.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Gelbart and I. Piatetski-Shapiro, “L-functions for G× GL(n)”, the preceding paper.

    Google Scholar 

  3. “On Euler Products and the Classification of Automorphic Representations I”, American J. Math., Vol. 103, No.3, pp. 499–558.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Kato, “On an explicit formula for class-1 Whittaker functions on split reductive groups over p-adic fields”, preprint, 1978, University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Piatetski-Shapiro and S. Rallis, “Rankin Triple L-functions”, preprint, Winter 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Ton-That, “On holomorphic representations of symplectic groups”, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 81, No.6 (1975), pp. 1069–1072.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Ton-That, “Lie group representations and harmonic polynomials of a matrix variable”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 26 (1976), pp. 1–46.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

General references for part B

  1. J. Arthur, “Automorphic Representations and Number Theory”, in Canadian Mathematical Society Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1, Providence, R.I., 1981, pp.3–51.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Bernstein, (=I.N. Bernstein), letter to Piatetski-Shapiro, Fall 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I.N. Bernstein and A.V. Zelevinsky, “Induced Representations of reductive p-adic groups I”, Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. 4e serie, t.10 (1977), pp. 441–472.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. I.N. Bernstein and A.V. Zelevinsky, “Representations of the group GL(n, F) where F is a local Non-Archimedean Field”, Russian Mathematical Surveys no.3 (1976), pp. 1–68, from Uspekhi Mat. Nauk. 31:3 (1976), 5–70.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Borel, “Automorphic L-functions”, in Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 33, Part 2, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 1979, pp. 27–61.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Borel, “Linear Algebraic Groups”, in Proc. of Symposia in Pure Math., Vol. 9, A.M.S., Providence, R.I., 1966, pp. 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Casselman, “Introduction to the theory of admissible representations of p-adic reductive groups”, mimeographed notes, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Casselman and J. Shalika, “The unramified principal series of p-adic groups II: The Whittaker function”, Compositio Math., Vol. 41, Fasc. 2 (1980), pp. 207–231.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Flicker, “Twisted Tensors and Euler Products”, preprint, 1985–86, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Garrett, Rankin Triple Products attached to Holomorphic Cusp Forms, preprint, 1985, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Gelbart, “Weil's Representation and the Spectrum of the Metaplectic Group”, Lecture Notes in Mathetmatics, Vol. 530, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Gelbart and H. Jacquet, “A relation between automorphic representations of GL(2) and GL(3)', Ann. Sci. Ecole Normale Sup., 4e serie, Vol. 11, (1978), pp. 471–552.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Gelbart and I. Piatetski-Shapiro, “Automorphic forms and L-functions for the Unitary Group”, in Lie Group Representations II, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1041, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984, pp. 141–184.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Gelbart and I. Piatetski-Shapiro, “Distinguished representations and modular forms of half-integral weight”, Inventiones Mathematicae, 59 (1980), pp. 145–188.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Gelbart and I. Piatetski-Shapiro, “On Shimura's correspondence for modular forms of half-integral weight”, Automorphic Forms, Representation theory and Arithmetic (Bombay, 1979), Tata Institute of Fund. Research Studies in Math., No. 10, Bombay, 1981, pp. 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  16. I.M. Gelfand and D. Kazhdan, “Representations of the group GL(n,K) where K is a local field”, in Lie Groups and their Representations, Halsted, New York, 1975, pp. 95–118.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Godement and H. Jacquet, “Zeta-functions of Simple Algebras”, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 260, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1972.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Howe, “Classification of Irreducible Representations of GL 2(F)”, preprint, I.H.E.S., Bures-sur-Yvette, France, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Howe and I. Piatetski-Shapiro, “Some examples of automorphic forms on Sp 4”, Duke Math. Journal, Vol. 50, No. 1, (1983), pp. 55–106.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Jacquet, “Automorphic Forms on GL(2), II”, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 278, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1972.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Jacquet, I. Piatetski-Shapiro and J. Shalika, “Rankin-Selberg Convolutions”, Amer. J. Math., Vol. 105, (1983), pp. 367–464.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Jacquet, I. Piatetski-Shapiro and J. Shalika, “Automorphic Forms on GL(3) II”, Annals of Math., 109 (1979), pp. 213–258.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Jacquet and J. Shalika, “On Euler Products and the Classification of Automorphic Representations I”, Amer. J. Math., Vol. 103, No.3, pp. 499–558.

    Google Scholar 

  24. N. Jacobson, Basic Algebra I, W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1974.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Kato, “On the explicit formula for class-1 Whittaker functions on split reductive groups over p-adic fields”, preprint 1978, University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. Kazhdan and S.J. Patterson, “Metaplectic Forms”, Pub. Institut des Hautes Etudes scient., no. 59, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  27. T. Kubota, “Automorphic functions and the reciprocity law in a number field”, mimeographed notes, Kyoto University, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R.P. Langlands, “Problems in the Theory of Automorphic Forms”, in Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 170, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1970, pp. 18–86.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. R.P. Langlands, Euler Products, Yale University Press, James K. Whitmore Lectures, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  30. R.P. Langlands, “On the Functional Equations satisfied by Eisenstein Series', Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 544, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. C. Moore, “Group extensions of p-adic linear groups”, Publ. Math. I.H.E.S. No.35 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  32. I. Piatetski-Shapiro, “Euler Subgroups”, in Lie Groups and their Representations, Halsted, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  33. I. Piatetski-Shapiro, “Tate Theory for Reductive Groups and Distinguished Representations”, Proceedings of the International Congress of Math., Helsinki, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  34. I. Piatetski-Shapiro and S. Rallis, “L-functions for the Classical Groups”, Part I of this volume; see also the announcement “L-functions of Automorphic Forms on Simple Classical groups” Chapter 10 in Modular Forms, ed. R. Rankin, Ellis Horward, 1984, pp. 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  35. I. Piatetski-Shapiro and S. Rallis, “ε-factors of Representations of Classical Groups”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A.; Vol. 83, pp.4589–4593, July 1986.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. I. Piatetski-Shapiro and S. Rallis, Rankin Triple L-funtions, preprint, Winter 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  37. I. Piatetski-Shapiro and D. Soudry, “L and ε functions for GSp(4)×GL(2), Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., Vol. 81, June 1984, pp. 3924–3927.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. I. Piatetski-Shapiro and D. Soudry, “Automorphic Forms on the Symplectic Group of Order four”, preprint, Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques, Bures-sur-Yvette, July 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. Rankin, Contributions to the theory of Ramanujan's function τ(n) and similar arithmetical functions, I and II”, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 35, (1939), pp. 351–356 and 357–372.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. A. Selberg, “Bemerkungen uber eine Dirichletsche Reihe, die mit der Theorie der Modulformer nahe verbunden ist”, Arch. Math. Naturvid. 43 (1940), pp. 47–50.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. F. Shahidi, “On Certain L-functions”, Amer. J. Math., Vol. 103, No.2, 1981, pp. 297–355.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. F. Shahidi, On the Ramanujan Conjecture and the finiteness of poles of certain L-functions, preprint, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  43. J. Shalika, “The multiplicity one theorem for GL n ”, Annals of Math. Vol. 100, No.1, (1974), pp. 171–193.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. G. Shimura, “On the holomorphy of certain Dirichlet series”, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 31 (1975), pp. 79–98.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. G. Shimura, “On modular forms of half-integral weight”, Annals of Math., Vol. 97 (1973), pp. 440–481.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. D. Soudry, “The L and γ factors for generic representations of GSp(4, k)×GL(2, k) over a local nonarchimedean field k”, Duke Math. J., Vol. 51, No.2, June 1984, pp. 355–394.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. T. Ton-That, “On holomorphic representations of symplectic groups”, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. Vol. 81, No. 6 (1975), pp. 1069–1072.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. T. Ton-That, “Lie group representations and harmonic polynomials of a matrix variable”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 126 (1976), pp. 1–46.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. A. Weil, “Sur certaines groupes d'opérateurs unitaires”, Acta Math. 111 (1964), pp. 143–211.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. S. Gelbart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Piatetski-Shapiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gelbart, S., Piatetski-Shapiro, I. (1987). L-functions for G×GL(n). In: Explicit Constructions of Automorphic L-Functions. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 1254. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0078127

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0078127

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-17848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47880-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation