Skip to main content

Multiple subarguments in logic, argumentation, rhetoric and text generation

  • Accepted Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Qualitative and Quantitative Practical Reasoning (FAPR 1997, ECSQARU 1997)

Abstract

A summary is provided of the problems of representing, determining generating and arranging disjunct multiple subarguments in several fields, including formal systems in uncertain domains, informal logic accounts of argument structure, rhetorical systems for maximising persuasive effect, and the automatic generation of persuasive discourse. Drawing upon the insights, problems, and partial solutions of these fields, a theory of subargument construction and organisation is presented, and is set in a framework for generating natural language argument.

This work has been partly funded by EPSRC grant no. 94313824.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baccus F. & Yang Q. “The expected value of hierarchical problem-solving”, in Proceedings of the National Conference on AI (AAA1'92) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M., Arguing and thinking (Second edition), Cambridge University Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, H. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, Charles Daly, London (1838)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, M.E., Israel, DJ., Pollack, M.E., “Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning”, Computational Intelligence 4 (1988) 349–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., “Analyzing the Structure of Argumentative Discourse”, Computational Linguistics 13(1) (1987) 11–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S., Fox, J. & Krause, P., “A Unified Framework for Hypothetical and Practical Reasoning (1): Theoretical Foundations”, in Gabbay, D. & Ohlbach, H.J. Practical Reasoning, Springer Verlag (1996) 58–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Dung, P.M., “On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games”, Artificial Intelligence 77 (1995) 321–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A., The Logic of Real Arguments, Cambridge University Press (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogelin, R.J. & Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Understanding Arguments (Fourth Edition), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. & Das, S., “A Unified Framework for Hypothetical and Practical Reasoning (2): Lessons from Medical Applications”, in Gabbay, D. & Ohlbach, H.J. Practical Reasoning, Springer Verlag (1996) 73–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. & Long, D.P. “Hierarchical Planning using Abstraction”, IEE Proceedings on Control Theory and Applications 142 (3) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J.B., Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments, Foris (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovy, E.H., “Pragmatics and Natural Language Generation”, Artificial Intelligence 43 (1991) 153–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovy, E.H. “Automated Discourse Generation Using Discourse Structure Relations”, Artificial Intelligence 63 (1993) 341–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, P., Ambler, S., Elvang-Gøransson, M. & Fox, J., “A Logic of Argumentation for Reasoning under Uncertainty”, Computational Intelligence 11 (1995) 113–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W.C. & Thompson, S.A. “Rhetorical structure theory: description and construction of text structures” in Kempen, G., Natural Language Generation: New Results in AI, Psychology and Linguistics, Kluwer (1986) 279–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcu, D., “The Conceptual and Linguistic Facets of Persuasive Arguments”, in Working Notes of the ECAI'96 Workshop on Planning and NLG (1996) 43–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybury, M.T., “Communicative Acts for Generating Natural Language Arguments”, in Proceedings of the 11th National Conference on AI (AAAI'93) (1993) 357–364

    Google Scholar 

  • McConachy, R. & Zukerman, I., “Using Argument Graphs to Generate Arguments”, in Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on AI (ECAI'96) (1996) 592–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Meteer, M., Expressibility and the Problem of Efficient Text Planning, Francis Pinter (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.D., Paris, C.L. “Planning Text for Advisory Dialogues: Capturing Intentional and Rhetorical Information”, Computational Linguistics 19 (4) (1994) 651–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, S., “Defining Normative Systems for Qualitative Argumentation”, in Gabbay, D. & Ohlbach, H.J. Practical Reasoning, Springer Verlag (1996) 449–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, S. & Jennings, N.R., “Negotiation Through Argumentation — a Preliminary Report”, in Proceedings of the International Conf on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS'96) (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J.L., Cognitive Carpentry, MIT Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J. L., “Implementing Defeasible Reasoning”, in Working Notes of the FAPR'96 Workshop on Computational Dialectics (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, C.A., Long, D.P., Fox, M. & Garagnani, M., “Persuasion as a Form of Inter-Agent Negotiation”, in Proceedings of the 2nd Australian Workshop on DAI (1996a, to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, C.A., Long, D.P. & Fox, M. “An Architecture for Argumentative Dialogue Planning”, in Gabbay, D. & Ohlbach, H.J. Practical Reasoning, Springer Verlag (1996b) 555–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, C.A. & Long, D.P., “Ordering and Focusing in an Architecture for Persuasive Discourse”, under review for European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (EWNLG'97) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacerdoti, E.D. A structure for plans and behaviour, Elsevier, North Holland (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillince, J.A.A & Minors, R.H., “Argumentation, Self-Inconsistency, and Multidimensional Argument Strength”, Communication and Cognition 25 (4) (1992) 325–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.H., Garigliano, R., Morgan, R.C. “Generation in the LOLITA system: An engineering approach” in Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on NLG, Kennebunkport, Maine (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sycara, K. “Argumentation: Planning Other Agent's Plans” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on AI (IJCAI'89) (1989) 517–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.E., The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vreeswijk, G., “Reasoning with Defeasible Arguments”, in Wagner, G. & Pearce, D. (eds) Proc. of the European Workshop on Logics in AI (JELIA'92), Springer Verlag (1992) 189–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D.N. & Krabbe, E.C.W., Commitment in Dialogue, State University of New York Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whately, R. Logic, Richard Griffin, London (1855)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, M. & Jennings, N.R., “Intelligent Agents: Theory and Practice”, The Knowledge Engineering Review 10 (2) (1995) 115–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanal, R.J., “'Convergent’ and ‘Linked’ Reasons.”, APA Newsletter on Teaching Philosophy, 4 (5), (1984)1–3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Dov M. Gabbay Rudolf Kruse Andreas Nonnengart Hans Jürgen Ohlbach

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reed, C., Long, D. (1997). Multiple subarguments in logic, argumentation, rhetoric and text generation. In: Gabbay, D.M., Kruse, R., Nonnengart, A., Ohlbach, H.J. (eds) Qualitative and Quantitative Practical Reasoning. FAPR ECSQARU 1997 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1244. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0035644

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0035644

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63095-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69129-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics