Skip to main content

Isolation and fractionation of humic substances in lake waters

  • Session 1: Isolation, Fractionation, And Characterization
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Humic Substances in the Aquatic and Terrestrial Environment

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences ((LNEARTH,volume 33))

Abstract

Dissolved organic matter (DOM) in water from two lakes (spring and autumn samples) was isolated and fractionated by ultrafiltration (UF) and XAD-8 techniques. The difference between the spring and autumn samples was greatest for the colour, CODMn and DOC values. High-performance size-exclusion chromatography gave useful information on the molecular size distribution of the DOM. The two largest fractions of DOM were within the nominal molecular mass cutoffs 103–104 and 104–105, respectively. Decreasing of DOM of UF-concentrates in the XAD-8 treatment was the greatest for the former cutoff. Some similarity of molecular masses (weight and number averages) could be found between the DOM-fractions within the 103–104 cutoff isolated by UF and fulvic acids isolated directly from the original water samples by the XAD-8 technique. The total amounts of humic substances separated from the UF-concentrates were about 25% higher than those obtained directly from the original water samples. The results show that the usefulness of a given reference humus depends strongly on its origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Thurman, E. M. and R. L. Malcolm. In: R. F. Christman and E. T. Gjessing, Eds., Aquatic and Terrestrial Humic Materials, pp. 1–23 (Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Sci. Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thurman, E. M. Organic Geochemistry of Natural Waters (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff/Dr.W. Junk Publishers, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steinberg, C. and U. Muenster. In: G. R. Aiken, D. M. McKnight, R. L. Wershaw and P. MacCarthy, Eds., Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment and Water, pp. 105–145 (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. McKnight, D., E. M. Thurman and R. L. Wershaw. Ecology 66:1339 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aiken, G. R. In: G. R. Aiken, D. M. McKnight, R. L. Wershaw and P. MacCarthy, Eds., Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment and Water, pp. 363–408 (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aiken, G. R., E. M. Thurman and R. L. Malcolm. Anal. Chem. 51:1799 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thurman, E. M. and R. L. Malcolm. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15:463 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leenheer, J. A. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15:578 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pihlaja, K. and J. Peuravuori. — Presented in this publication.

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Haan, H. In: R. F. Christman and E. T. Gjessing, Eds., Aquatic and Terrestrial Humic Materials, pp. 165–182 (Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Sci. Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kronberg, L., B. Holmbom and L. Tikkanen. Sci. Tot. Environ. 47:343 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jones, R. I., K. Salonen and H. De Haan. Freshwater Biol. 19:357 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Haan, H., R. I. Jones and K. Salonen. Freshwater Biol. 17:453 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vartiainen, T., A. Liimatainen and P. Kauranen. Sci. Tot. Environ. 62:75 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Michaels, A. S. In: E. S. Perry, Ed., Progress in Separation and Purification, pp. 297–334 (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ganzerli Valentini, M. T., L. Maggi., R. Stella and G. Ciceri. Chem. in Ecol. 1: 279 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maggi, L., R. Stella and G. Ciceri. Annali di Chimica 74:257 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  18. MacCarthy, P., M. J. Peterson, R. L. Malcolm and E. M. Thurman. Anal. Chem. 51:2041 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peuravuori, J. Chemical and physical properties of humus and their variation in different natural conditions. The significance of a reference humus. Part I. Isolation and fractionation of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from natural waters. Characterization using gel chromatography (in Finnish), (Turku: University of Turku, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hine, P. T., and D. B. Bursill. Water Res. 18:1461 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Haan, H., G. Werlemark and T. De Boer. Plant and Soil 75:63 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Visser, S. A. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17:412 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Aiken, G. R. In: F. H. Frimmel and R. F. Christman, Eds., Humic Substances and Their Role in the Environment, pp. 15–28 (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fuchsman, C. H. Peat. Industrial Chemistry and Technology, p. 160 (New York: Academic, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schnitzer, M. In: Schnitzer, M. and S. U. Khan, Eds., Soil Organic Matter, p. 57 (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Bert Allard Hans Borén Anders Grimvall

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Peuravuori, J., Pihlaja, K. (1991). Isolation and fractionation of humic substances in lake waters. In: Allard, B., Borén, H., Grimvall, A. (eds) Humic Substances in the Aquatic and Terrestrial Environment. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol 33. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0010464

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0010464

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53702-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46985-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics