Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES))

Abstract

This chapter informs the readers about the background of bone age assessment of which include the clinical practicality, and the pros and cons of the conventional methods of this assessment. After that, we explain the automated system that is capable of substituting the conventional methods by further elaborating the pitfalls and constraints of this alternative. Then, we define our objective in this book and delimit the discussion scope of this book follow by stating the contributions of this book for the field in hand bone segmentation. Lastly, we provide the outline of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tanner JM (2001) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3 method), W.B. Saunders, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aicardi G, Vignolo M, Milani S, Naselli A, Magliano P, Garzia P (2000) Assessment of skeletal maturity of the hand-wrist and knee: a comparison among methods. Am J Hum Biol 12:610–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao F, Huang HK, Pietka E, Gilsanz V (2000) Digital hand atlas and web-based bone age assessment: system design and implementation. Comput Med Imaging Graph 24:297–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin DD, Heckmann C, Jenni OG, Ranke MB, Binder G, Thodberg HH (2011) Metacarpal thickness, width, length and medullary diameter in children-reference curves from the First Zürich longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int 22:1525–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roche AF, French NY (1970) Differences in skeletal maturity levels between the knee and hand. Am J Roentgenol 109:307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chemaitilly W, Sklar CA (2010) Endocrine complications in long-term survivors of childhood cancers. Endocr Relat Cancer 17:R141–R159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heinrich UE (1986) Significance of radiologic skeletal age determination in clinical practice. Die Bedeutung der radiologischen Skelettalterbestimmung für die Klinik 26:212–215

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peloschek P, Nemec S, Widhalm P, Donner R, Birngruber E, Thodberg HH et al (2009) Computational radiology in skeletal radiography. Eur J Radiol 72:252–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tristán-Vega A, Arribas JI (2008) A radius and ulna TW3 bone age assessment system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55:1463–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Greulich W, Pyle S (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of hand wrist

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tanner J, Whitehouse R (1975) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 method)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aja-Fernández S, De Luis-García R, Martín-Fernández MÁ, Alberola-López C (2004) A computational TW3 classifier for skeletal maturity assessment. A computing with words approach. J Biomed Inform 37:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Acheson RM, Fowler G, Fry EI, Janes M, Koski K, Urbano P et al (1963) Studies in the reliability of assessing skeletal maturity from x-rays. 3. Greulich-Pyle Atlas and Tanner-Whitehouse method contrasted. Hum Biol; Int Rec Res 35:317–349

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martin DD, Deusch D, Schweizer R, Binder G, Thodberg HH, Ranke MB (2009) Clinical application of automated Greulich-Pyle bone age determination in children with short stature. Pediatr Radiol 39:598–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ontell FK, Ivanovic M, Ablin DS, Barlow TW (1996) Bone age in children of diverse ethnicity. Am J Roentgenol 167:1395–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanner JM, Gibbons RD (1994) Automatic bone age measurement using computerized image analysis. J Pediatr Endocrinol 7:141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hsieh CW, Jong TL, Chou YH, Tiu CM (2007) Computerized geometric features of carpal bone for bone age estimation. Chin Med J 120:767–770

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pietka E, Gertych A, Pospiech S, Cao F, Huang HK, Gilsanz V (2001) Computer-assisted bone age assessment: Image preprocessing and epiphyseal/metaphyseal ROI extraction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:715–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thodberg HH, Jenni OG, Caflisch J, Ranke MB, Martin DD (2009) Prediction of adult height based on automated determination of bone age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:4868–4874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jonsson K (2002) Fundamentals of hand and wrist imaging. Acta Radiol 43:236

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Chai Hum .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hum, Y.C. (2013). Introduction. In: Segmentation of Hand Bone for Bone Age Assessment. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-66-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-66-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-4451-65-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-4451-66-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics