Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES))

  • 630 Accesses

Abstract

Statistical analysis and comparison results between current 2D assessment method and the proposed 3D method are conducted. In this section, we will analyze the degree of association, limits of agreement and repeatability of measurements for both 2D and 3D methods comparison. Intra-observer variability is tested to answer the repeatability skills between operators’ measurements. Pearson’s correlation value can be computed to evaluate the relationship between existing method and proposed new method. Levels of agreement between methods are analyzed using Bland–Altman’s test on three varied grouping observations. Repeatability coefficient is calculated to evaluate the measurements repeatability between the methods. This chapter looks into the test for the measurement results of proposed method. The findings are evaluated with the existing 2D measurement method. It includes the descriptive analyses, degree of association, limits of agreements, Paired sample t-test and repeatability between the methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical-methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1(8476), 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1995). Comparing methods of measurement—why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet, 346(8982), 1085–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(2), 135–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2007). Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 17(4), 571–582.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khin Wee Lai .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lai, K.W., Supriyanto, E. (2013). Clinical Tests and Measurements. In: Detection of Fetal Abnormalities Based on Three Dimensional Nuchal Translucency. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-96-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-96-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-4021-95-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-4021-96-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics