Skip to main content

Perspectives on Gifted Education in the Third Millennium

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity, Talent and Excellence

Abstract

This chapter reexamines perspectives on gifted education in the third millennium. Different sources of information enrich our knowledge regarding the individual needs and effects of the promotion of giftedness or talent. Relevant sources include the psychometric (status) vs. cognitive (process) paradigms, the descriptive vs. explanatory approaches, and prospective (status diagnostic) vs. retrospective (e.g., expertise) research paradigms. Giftedness or talent research (US-preferred terms) is known as high ability (European-preferred term) research. According to Julian Stanley, we know more about the “whats” than we do about the “whys”. This statement summarizes the status quo of our understanding of giftedness or talent, high ability or expertise, etc. This ascertainment leads to a challenge of gifted education in the 3rd millennium. Gifted education and related concepts shall explain the claim in details.

For the past decades, we have believed that East Asian students including those from China and Japan were less expressive and creative. Recently creativity education and research have given a priority in East and Southeast Asian societies. The move complements insufficient spaces of learning in these societies for creative imagination and innovation as they have been focusing on academic excellence in the forms of international competitive assessments and national examinations. There are many aspects in learning that affects creativity of students and teachers and that influence school excellence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, G. T., & Kercher, J. J. (1999). The autonomous learner model: Optimizing ability. Greeley, CO: ALPS Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1996). Western misconceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 45–67). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. R., & Kyriakides, M. L. (2011). Applying the Munich dynamic ability-achievement model. In A. Ziegler & C. Perleth (Eds.), Excellence (pp. 283–302). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. R., Tirri, K., Ruohotie, P., & Walberg, H. (Eds.). (2004). Cross-cultural research: Basic issues, dilemmas and strategies. Hämeenlinna, Finland: Research Centre for Vocational Education, University of Tampere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., Lin, C.-Y., & Hwang, D. (2011). Predictive relationships among variables on Math talent development based on the Munich dynamic ability achievement model. In A. Ziegler & C. Perleth (Eds.), Excellence (pp. 268–282). Berlin: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., Moon, J. H., & Park, J. O. (Eds.). (1996). Creativity for the 21st century. Selected proceedings of the third Asia- Pacific conference on giftedness. Seoul: The Korean Society for the Gifted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colangelo, N., & Davis, D. A. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández de Hahn, E. L. (2002). Cross- cultural studies in gifted education. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., rev. repr., pp. 549–561). Oxford/Amsterdam: Pergamon Press//Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresel, M. (2011). Motivation and self-regulation while learning with hypermedia: Results from a thinking aloud protocol study with Wikipedia. In A. Ziegler & C. Perleth (Eds.), Excellence (pp. 180–201). Berlin: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational process affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiebig, J. N. (2011). Gifted girls: Education and career. Where will their education and career path take them? In A. Ziegler & C. Perleth (Eds.), Excellence (pp. 116–124). Berlin: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (2002). Families: The essential context for gifts and talents. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., rev. repr., pp. 573–585). Oxford: Pergamon Press//Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (2011). Gender and excellence. In A. Ziegler & C. Perleth (Eds.), Excellence (pp. 125–141). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind. How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hany, E. A., & Heller, K. A. (2010). The development of problem solving capacities in the domain of technics. In K. A. Heller (Ed.), Munich studies of giftedness (pp. 93–108). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K.A. (1991). The nature and development of giftedness: A longitudinal study. European Journal for High Ability, 2, 174–188. Repr. Heller (2010, pp. 175–188).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (Ed.). (1992). Hochbegabung im Kindes- und Jugendalter (2. Aufl. 2001). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (2000). Psychology excellence program. World Gifted, 19, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (Guest Ed.). (2002). Program evaluation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3) (Special section), 187–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (1999). Individual (learning and motivational) needs versus instructional conditions of gifted education. High Ability Studies, 9, 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (2004). Identification of gifted and talented students. Psychology Science, 46, 302–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (2007). High ability and creativity: Conceptual and developmental perspectives. In A.-G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity. A handbook for teachers (pp. 47–64). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (2009). Gifted education from the German perspective. In T. Balchin, B. Hymer, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The Routledge international companion to gifted education (pp. 61–67). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (Ed.). (2010). Munich studies of giftedness. Berlin/London: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (2011). Foreword. In A.-G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity. An Asian-Euro-African perspective (pp. XIII–XIV). Singapore: Research Publishing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., & Hany, E. A. (1986). Identification, development, and achievement analysis of talented and gifted children in West Germany. In K. A. Heller & J. F. Feldhusen (Eds.), Identifying and nurturing the gifted. An international perspective (pp. 67–82). Toronto, ON: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., & Lengfelder, A. (2006). Evaluation study of the International Academic Olympiads three decades of cross-cultural and gender findings from North-American, European and East-Asian Olympians. In H. Helfrich, M. Zillekens, & E. Hölter (Eds.), Culture and development in Japan and Germany (pp. 155–175). Münster, Germany: Daedalus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., & Perleth, C. (2007). Münchner Hochbegabungstestbatterie (MHBT). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., & Perleth, C. (2008). The Munich High Ability Test Battery (MHBT): A multidimensional, multimethod approach. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., & Viek, P. (2000). Support for university students: Individual and social factors. In C. F. M. van Lieshout & G. Heymans (Eds.), Developing talents across the life-span (pp. 299–321). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., & Ziegler, A. (1996). Gender differences in mathematics and the natural sciences: Can attributional retraining improve the performance of gifted females? Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 200–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., & Ziegler, A. (2010). Gifted females: A cross-cultural survey. In K. A. Heller (Ed.), Munich studies of giftedness (pp. 543–548). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., Perleth, C., & Lim, T. K. (2005). The Munich model of giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 147–170). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., Reimann, R., & Senfter, A. (2005). Hochbegabung im Grundschulalter. Münster, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., Rindermann, H., & Reimann, R. (2010). A state-wide acceleration program at the German gymnasium. In K. A. Heller (Ed.), Munich studies of giftedness (pp. 477–487). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., von Bistram, A., & Collier, A. (2010). The enrichment program “Hector seminar”: A longitudinal evaluation study in MINT (STE§M). In K. A. Heller (Ed.), Munich studies of giftedness (pp. 433–454). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., Hany, E. A., Perleth, C., & Sierwald, W. (2010). The Munich longitudinal study of giftedness. In K. A. Heller (Ed.), Munich studies of giftedness (pp. 13–40). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., Mönks, F. J., Sternberg, R. J., & Subotnik, R. F. (Eds.).(2002). Handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., rev. repr.). Oxford/Amsterdam: Pergamon Press//Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönks, F. J., Heller, K. A., & Passow, A. H. (2002). The study of giftedness: Reflections on where we are and where we are going. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. F. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., rev. repr., pp. 839–863). Oxford: Pergamon Press//Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neber, H. (1999). Entdeckendes lernen. In C. Perleth & A. Ziegler (Eds.), Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 227–235). Bern, Switzerland: Huber Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neber, H., & Heller, K. A. (2002). Evaluation of a Summer-school program for highly gifted secondary-school students: The German pupils academy. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 214–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perleth, C. (2001). Follow-up-Untersuchungen zur Münchner Hochbegabungsstudie. In K. A. Heller (Ed.), Hochbegabung im Kindes- und Jugendalter (2nd ed., pp. 357–446). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R. (1994). Genetics and experience. The interplay between nature and nurture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindermann, H. (2011). Results in the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) as indicators of the intellectual classes’ cognitive-ability level. In A. Ziegler & C. Perleth (Eds.), Excellence (pp. 303–321). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S. (1997). Behavior genetic and socialization theories of intelligence. Truce and reconciliation. In R. J. Sternberg & A. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence. heredity and environment (pp. 3–41). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (1993). Acquiring expertise: Determinants of exceptional performance. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 311–324). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (2002). Giftedness, expertise, and (exceptional) performance: A developmental perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., rev. repr., pp. 165–177). Oxford: Pergamon Press/Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J. (2011). Putting your ideas into practice. In A. Ziegler & C. Perleth (Eds.), Excellence (pp. 322–329). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeger, H. (2007). Berufskarrieren begabter Frauen. In K. A. Heller & A. Ziegler (Eds.), Begabt sein in Deutschland (pp. 265–290). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (1993). Longitudinal studies of giftedness: Investigation the fulfillment of promise. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 149–160). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., & Steiner, C. L. (1993). Adult manifestations of adolescent talent in science: A longitudinal study of 1983 Westinghouse science talent search winners. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 52–76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (Eds.). (1994). Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F. & Arnold, K. D. (2000). Addressing the most challenging questions in gifted education and psychology. A role best suited to longitudinal research. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 243–251). Oxford: Pergamon Press/Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., Edmiston, A., Lee, G. S., Almaradode, K., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Exploring intensive educational experiences for adolescents talented in science. In A. Ziegler & C. Perleth (Eds.), Excellence (pp. 142–157). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A.-G. (Ed.). (2007). Creativity: A handbook for teachers. Hackensack, NJ/London/Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A.-G. (2011a). Constructive creativity for developing excellence. In A. Ziegler & C. Perleth (Eds.), Excellence (pp. 60–75). Berlin, Germany/London: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A.-G. (Ed.). (2011b). Creativity. An Asian-Euro-African perspective. Singapore: Research Publishing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, M. (2011). Psychological studies of inventive creativity among children and adolescents: The concept, a literature review, and a report of an empirical study. In A. Ziegler & C. Perleth (Eds.), Excellence (pp. 245–258). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. A. & Plomin, R. (2002). Genetic tools for exploring individual differences in intelligence. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., rev. repr., pp. 157–164). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A. (2011). The Hector Seminar: A beacon for high-school talent development in STEM school subjects. In A. Ziegler & C. Perleth (Eds.), Excellence (pp. 47–59). Berlin, Germany: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., & Perleth, C. (Eds.). (2011). Excellence: Essays in honour of Kurt A. Heller. Berlin, Germany/London: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H. (1992). The scientific elite: Nobel Laureates’ mutual influences. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed., pp. 157–169). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The content of this chapter was read at the ABB-Symposium “Gifted education international” (chaired by Ai-Girl Tan) at the University of Erfurt (Germany) on September 30, 2011, in conjunction of Kurt A. Heller’s 80th birthday celebration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt A. Heller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heller, K.A. (2013). Perspectives on Gifted Education in the Third Millennium. In: Tan, AG. (eds) Creativity, Talent and Excellence. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-93-7_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics