Skip to main content

European Union Foreign Investment Policy in Asia and India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
India, Europe and Asia
  • 202 Accesses

Abstract

Trade and investment have never been more important in international political economy than in current times, especially after the 2008 financial crisis, which brought a realization that investment and trade could be a stabilizing force in difficult times. This chapter analyzes the role of the European Union’s foreign direct investment on Asia and India. It examines the extent to which the attraction of FDI in India (and other Asian economies) has depended on the stage of development of the host economy. It highlights the key elements and drivers of the theory of investment development path. It analyses the role of EU FDI in global terms as well as the main arguments that explain the leading role played by the EU and the type of trade and investment relations Brussels seeks to establish with third partners. It deals with the implications of the failure to conclude a Bilateral Trade and Investment Agreement on trade and investment for both India and the EU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amighini, A. (2016). EU External Trade Strategy Vis-Ă€-Vis Asia. European Parliament. Retrieved February 6, 2018, from http://www.ispionline.it/DOC/eu_asia_2.pdf.

  • Arregui, J. (2015). Relaciones econĂłmicas UE-EEUU: negociaciĂłn e implicaciones del ttip. Revista CIDOB D’Afers Internacionals, 110, 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellak, C., Leibrecht, M., & Stehrer, R. (2010). The Role of Public Policy in Closing Foreign Direct Investment Gaps: An Empirical Analysis. Empirica, 37(1), 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biglaiser, G., & De Rouen, K. (2006). Economic Reforms and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 41(1), 51–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Casson, H. (1976). The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bungenberg, M., & Hazarika, A. (2017). The European Union’s Trade and Investment Policy in Asia: New Challenges and Opportunities in a Changing Global Environment or: Following Individual Roadmaps. Asia Europe Journal, 15(4), 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaisse, J. (2012). Promises and Pitfalls of the European Union Policy on Foreign Investment: How Will the New Eu Competence on FDI Affect the Emerging Global Regime? Journal of International Economic Law, 15(1), 51–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deichmann, U., Lall, S. V., Redding, S. J., & Venables, A. J. (2008). Industrial Location in Developing Countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 23(2), 219–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1980). Toward and Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(000001), 9–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1981). Explaining the International Direct Investment Position of Countries: Towards a Dynamic or Developmental Approach. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 119, 30–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1986). The Investment Development Cycle Revisited. Weltwirtshaftlicher Archive, 122, 667–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1993). The Globalization of Business: The Challenge of the 1990s. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (2000). The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for Economic and Business Theories of MNE Activity. International Business Review, 9(2), 163–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (2001). The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future. International Journal of The Economics of Business, 8(2), 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., & Narula, R. (1996). Foreign Direct Investment and Governments. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., & Narula, R. (2004). Multinationals and Industrial Competitiveness: A New Agenda. Great Britain: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durán, J. J., & Ăšbeda, F. (2005). The Investment Development Path of Newly Developed Countries. International Journal Of The Economics Of Business, 12(1), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). The Long Road Towards an EU-India Free Trade Agreement. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201310/20131023ATT73262/20131023ATT73262EN.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2020.

  • European Commission. (2016). Trade for All: Towards a More Responsible Trade and Investment Policy. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d90eda7c-7299–11e5-9317-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-128273195. Accessed 11 May 2020.

  • European Commission. (2018). Key Elements of the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_18_6784. Accessed 11 May 2020.

  • European Commission. (2020). Overview of FTAs and Other Trade Negotiations. https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/december/tradoc_118238.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2020.

  • European Commission, Directorate General for Trade. (2018). European Union Trade with India. Retrieved January 12, 2018, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_113390.pdf.

  • European Parliament. (2016). Asia as a New Global Engine: Foreign Trade and Regional Cooperation. https://www.ispionline.it/DOC/EU_Parl_Asia_1.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2020.

  • Eurostat. (2018a). http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=ext_lt_mainez&lang=en. Accessed 20 June 2018.

  • Eurostat. (2018b). Foreign Direct Investment Between the European Union and BRIC (data since 2010). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/pdfscache/35347.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2018.

  • Eurostat. (2018c). EU Direct Investment Flows, Breakdown by Partner Country and Economic Activity (data between 2007 and 2010). http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do. Accessed 20 June 2018.

  • Eurostat. (2018d). European Union Foreign Direct Investment Yearbook 2007 (data before 2007). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/coded_files/fdi_yearbook_2007.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2018.

  • FDI Intelligence. (2017). FDI Markets Report 2017. https://hinrichfoundation.com/resource-center-reports/fdi-report-2017-global-greenfield-investment-trends/. Accessed 13 May 2020.

  • Felisoni, C., Eunni, R. V., & Dias, N. M. M. (2010). Determinants of FDI in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Brazil. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 20(–3), 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. (2003). Governance Infrastructure and US Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse, R. (1988). The Economic Impact of Foreign Direct Investment: A Case Study of Venezuela. Management International Review, 28(4), 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. S., & Rashid, H. A. (2011). Macroeconomic and Country Specific Determinants of FDI. The Business Review, 18(1), 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabbour, L., & Mucchielli, J. L. (2007). Technology Transfer Through Vertical Linkages: The Case of the Spanish Manufacturing Industry. Journal of Applied Economics, 10(1), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik, B. (2004). Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers Through Backward Linkages. The American Economic Review, 94(3), 605–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, F. (2005). Driving Forces of International Pharmaceutical Firms FDI into China. Journal of Business Strategies, 22(1), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (1977). The Internationalization Process of the Firm: A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, C. C. Y., & Tadesse, S. (2006). The MNC as an Agent of Change for Host-Country Institutions: FDI and Corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 767–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Clarke-Hill, C. M. (2004). Sino-British Joint Ventures in China. European Business Review, 16(1), 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maniam, B. (2007). An Empirical Investigation of US FDI in Latin America. Journal of International Business Research, 6(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, Resources, and Entry Strategies in Emerging Economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Na, L., & Lightfoot, W. S. (2006). Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment at the Regional Level in China. Journal of Technology Management in China, 1(3), 262–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2008). Benchmark Definition of Foreign Direct Investment. Retrieved January 10, 2018, from https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investmentstatisticsandanalysis/40193734.pdf.

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). New Global Strategies for Competitive Advantage. Planning Review, 18(3), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, J. P. (2007). Growth of Indian Multinationals in the World Economy: Implications for Development. Working Paper No. 4, New Delhi: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quer, D., Claver, E., & Rienda, L. (2011). Multinacionales Chinas: ÂżCĂłmo influyen los factores institucionales en sus patrones de localizaciĂłn? Cuadernos de GestiĂłn, 11(2), 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan, V., & Agrawal, G. (2011). FDI Inflow Determinants in BRIC Countries: A Panel Data Analysis. International Business Research, 4(4), 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X., Bilbao-Osorio, B., Blanke, J., Hanouz, M. D., & Geiger, T. (2011). The Global Competitiveness Index 2011–2012: Setting the Foundations for Strong Productivity. The Global Competitiveness Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2006). World Investment Report 2006. FDI from Developing and Transition Economies: Implications for Development. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2008). Transnational Corporations and the Infrastructure Challenge. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD Investment Brief. (2004). India’s Outward FDI: A Giant Awakening? Retrieved January 16, 2018, from http://unctad.org/en/pages/PressReleaseArchive.aspx?ReferenceDocId=5576.

  • Van Wyk, J., & Lal, A. K. (2010). FDI Location Drivers and Risks in MENA. Journal of International Business Research, 9(2), 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., Dunning, J., & Lundan, S. (2008). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(7), 1236–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verna, R., & Brennan, L. (2011). The Investment Development Path Theory: Evidence from India. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 6(1), 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogiatzoglou, K. (2008). What Determines U.S., EU and Japanese FDI Within AFTA? ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 25(2), 140–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Muenchow-Pohl, B. (2012). EU Relations with China and India: Courting the Dragon, Wooing the Elephant. Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalley, J. (2008). Recent Regional Agreements: Why so Many, Why so Much Variance in Form, Why Coming so Fast and Where are They Headed? The World Economy, 31(4), 517–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2017). World Databank [Custom Cross-Tabulation of Data]. Retrieved from: https://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspx.

  • Yamawaki, H. (2006). The Location of American and Japanese Multinationals in Europe. International Economics and Economic Policy, 3(2), 157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K. H. (2001). Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Economic Growth? Evidence from East Asia and Latin America. Contemporary Economic Policy, 19(2), 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., & Zhu, G. (2000). Location Factors and Country-of-Origin Differences: An Empirical Analysis of FDI in China. Multinational Business Review, 8(1), 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclaimer

The production of this chapter has been co-funded by the Erasmus + Programme of the European Union. The European Commission’s support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflect the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

figure a

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Arregui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arregui, J. (2021). European Union Foreign Investment Policy in Asia and India. In: Jain, R.K. (eds) India, Europe and Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4608-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics