Skip to main content

Plant Resources as Ecosystems Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Living with Biodiversity in an Island Ecosystem

Part of the book series: Ethnobiology ((EBL))

  • 421 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter employs a quantitative ethnobotanical analysis to explore the kinds of plants the people use for their daily life and compares the local plant and land use patterns of a rural village and an urbanized village. This chapter then addresses how local people depend on biodiversity and how traditional human modifications of the forest contribute to the conservation of biodiversity. As a result, the proportion of useful trees was high in the barrier island’s primary forest (68.4 %) and the main island’s reserve (68.3 %) and low in the main island’s secondary forest (29.3 %). Some species were found only in human-modified forests (e.g., reserve and secondary forests). Additionally, the reserve and mangrove forests, which existed exclusively in the rural village area, provided the rural people with a number of useful resources, while the urban people lacked access to these resources. These findings illustrate how a local society’s use of resources was related to community welfare as well as to environmental preservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For detailed observations of plant use, 15 and 17 household s were randomly selected from the 65 and 202 households in Olive and Dunde , respectively. Written informed consent for participation in the survey was obtained from each head-of-household (head). The participants were informed that they could withdraw from the study at any time and that they had a right to refuse to answer any questions. All interviews were conducted in the local Roviana language by the author with the help of local assistants (Mr. Edwin Huti and Mr. Rex Daga). No economic incentives were provided to the participant households to avoid bias; however, following completion of the research, a suitable cultural gift (food ) was given to each household.

  2. 2.

    The food surveys were conducted in August in both villages to avoid seasonal differences between the two villages.

  3. 3.

    Although the villagers planted a number of varieties of these root crop s, all varieties were grouped at the species level.

  4. 4.

    When the patient consulted other villagers or herbalists outside of the village, the herbalist was interviewed about the recipe. If the herbalist refused to disclose his/her recipe, that treatment was excluded from the analysis.

  5. 5.

    People commonly use a type of buni called buni masa (literally meaning “buni at the coast”; Calophyllum inophyllum); however, the buni used for building houses includes various Calophyllum species grown in forest.

References

  • Akimichi T (1978) The ecological aspect of Lau (the Solomon Islands) ethnoichthyology. The Journal of the Polynesian Society 87(4):301–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Dignan CA, Burlingame B, Kumar S, Aalbersberg W (1994) The Pacific Islands food consumption tables. New Zealand Institute for Crop and Food Research, Palmeston North

    Google Scholar 

  • Furusawa T (2006) The roles of western biomedicine and folk medicine in rural Solomon Islands: a quantitative analysis of villagers’ response to illness. Tropical Medicine and Health 34(2):83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furusawa T (2009) Changing ethnobotanical knowledge of the Roviana people, Solomon Islands: quantitative approaches to its correlation with modernization. Human Ecology 37(2):147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furusawa T, Sirikolo MQ, Sasaoka M, Ohtsuka R (2014) Interaction between forest biodiversity and people’s use of forest resources in Roviana, Solomon Islands: implications for biocultural conservation under socioeconomic changes. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 10(1):10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CP, Hancock IR (1988) A guide to the useful plants of Solomon Islands. Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, Honiara

    Google Scholar 

  • Hviding E (2005) Kiladi oro Vivineidi ria Tingitonga pa Idere oro pa Goana pa Marovo: reef and rainforest: an environmental encyclopedia of Marovo Lagoon, Solomon Islands. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hviding E, Bayliss-Smith T (2000) Islands of rainforest: agroforestry, logging and eco–tourism in Solomon Islands. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi S, Toujyou B, Vylayphone A, Gunawan H, Ugarte J, Ishimaru K (2013) Evaluation of carbon credit by semi-domestication of forest resources and safeguard. In: The proceedings of the international workshop on incentive of local community for REDD and semi-domestication of non-timber forest products, pp 179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwa’ioloa M, Burt B (2001) Na Masu’u kid’i Kwara’ae: Tualaka’i Solomon Islands fa’inia logo na rfi ne’e bulao saena fanoa kia: “Our Forest of Kwara’ae”: our life in Solomon Islands and the things which grow in our home. British Museum Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsui T (1989) Semidomestication: rethinking the origins of agriculture and Pastoralism [Semi-domesutikeishon: Noko to Yuboku no Kigen Saikou]. Kaimeisha, Tokyo. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pikacha PG (2008) Wild west: rainforests of Western Solomon Islands. Melanesian Geo Publication, Honiara

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin MJ (1995) The importance of ethnobotany for tropical forest conservation. In: Schultes RE, von Reis S (eds) Ethnobotany: evolution of a discipline. Dioscorides Press, Portland, pp 147–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance GT, Balee W, Boom BM (1987) Quantitative ethnobotany and the case for conservation in Amazonia. Conservation Biology 1(4):296–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puwastien P, Burlingame B, Raroengwichit M, Sungpung P (2000) ASEAN food composition tables. Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitoe P (1998) An ethnobotanical account of the vegetation vommunities of the Wola region, Southern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea. Journal of Ethnobiology 18:103–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith EA, Wishnie M (2000) Conservation and subsistence in small-scale socieites. Annual Review of Anthropology 29:493–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takekawa D (2000) Hunting method and the ecological knowledge of Dolphins among the Fanalei villagers of Malaita, Solomon Islands. SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin 12:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend PK (2000) Environmental anthropology: from pigs to policies. Waveland Press, Long Grove

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Furusawa, T. (2016). Plant Resources as Ecosystems Services. In: Living with Biodiversity in an Island Ecosystem. Ethnobiology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-904-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics